> In reply to Daniel Fetchinson:
>
> Thanks Daniel. As you say, it's legitimate to not commit to a deadline or
> timeline and there's nothing wrong with that.
>
> I wasn't really asking for a deadline or timeline, just trying to get an
> idea how the process is going.
Well, the status is this: pyt
> Over the past year, the lack of response by anyone to questions about PIL
> support of Python 3.x has been surprising. Surely the subject is of interest
> to some image-sig members.
>
> I´m guessing that the needed effort to extend that support must be very
> great, since other libraries such as
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 05:43:05 joe oettinger wrote:
> I´m guessing that the needed effort to extend that support must be very
> great, since other libraries such as Numpy haven´t been modified for
> Python 3.x either.
FYI: There is already a development release of NumPy with Py3k compatibility.
So
Mark wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to ask when PIL plans to support for Python 3?
http://effbot.org/zone/pil-index.htm
Thanks in advance for the information,
Mark
P.s. For those interested, I have just release a new freeimagepy version
(2.0.1, available only via svn due to a sf.net problem :(
