Re: [IMail Forum] Unexpected spam filtering

2005-02-26 Thread Scott Perry
The Message-ID: header was not RFC-compliant. Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ABNF extracted from RFC 2822 Internet Message Format: Actually, RFC822 is still the official standard (per http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcxx00.html). RFC822 has: msg-id = addr-spec ; Unique

Re: [IMail Forum] Unexpected spam filtering

2005-02-26 Thread Rod Dorman
On Saturday, February 26, 2005, 08:19:35, Scott Perry wrote: Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Actually, RFC822 is still the official standard (per http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcxx00.html). And doing a search at http://www.rfc-editor.org/cgi-bin/rfcsearch.pl for RFC822 shows More Info of Obsoleted

Re: [IMail Forum] Unexpected spam filtering

2005-02-26 Thread Rod Dorman
On Saturday, February 26, 2005, 01:56:48, Matt wrote: When using an IP address as a domain-literal, the RFC specifies that it must be enclosed in square brackets. No disagreement here but I didn't claim that 81.255.84.73 was a domain-literal. While domain-literals in the Received lines are

RE: [IMail Forum] rl-recv: connection reset - huh?

2005-02-26 Thread Marc Funaro
And once again bandwidth is wasted so someone can whine, thereby alienating someone instead of helping them. whhaa -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rod Dorman Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 12:50 PM To:

Re: [IMail Forum] rl-recv: connection reset - huh?

2005-02-26 Thread Rod Dorman
On Saturday, February 26, 2005, 14:09:32, Marc Funaro wrote: And once again bandwidth is wasted so someone can whine, thereby alienating someone instead of helping them. whhaa Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to use existing knowledge bases/archives

RE: [IMail Forum] rl-recv: connection reset - huh?

2005-02-26 Thread Marc Funaro
Slap him upside the head with the fish, he might still learn what you've tried to teach him, but his desire to pass on his knowledge in a *positive* fashion is forever diminished. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rod Dorman Sent:

[IMail Forum] Free 4-user version?

2005-02-26 Thread Michael Grice
I thought at one time IMail had a free 4-user version. Was/is this the case? I could not find anything on the IPswitch site or the archives. I wanted to have someone try that version, to see if they liked it to get a IMail server.

RE: [IMail Forum] Free 4-user version?

2005-02-26 Thread George Dailey [Tech]
Just have them download the evaluation version. IMail Express is no longer available. George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Grice Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2005 3:29 PM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum]

Re: [IMail Forum] Free 4-user version?

2005-02-26 Thread Darin Cox
I believe Ipswitch got rid of it about the same time they jacked up the price of IMail by about 4x. If you're interested, SmarterTools (www.smartertools.com) has a free single-domain version of their mail server, SmarterMail. Darin. - Original Message - From: Michael Grice [EMAIL