Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ted Galerneau
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 6:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch
Executive Team
It's also possible that spammers will also create a new SPF
to blacklist for a lot of us.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ted Galerneau
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 6:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch
Executive Team
It's also possible
- Original Message -
From: x [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 21:49
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
Ted Galerneau wrote:
Thanks Mr. X, it's looking better to me as time progresses and I may
just go
Snip our philosophy is better the devil you know than the devil you don't.
Snip
This is the only pro Imail argument that is making any business sense to me
at this moment. I just wish I didn't have the sinking feeling that Ipswitch
knows how much trouble it is to change mail servers, so they are
anti-virus renewals. This can range from $0 for ClamAV
to $50 for F-Prot. AVG and Mcafee fall in the middle price-wise.
- Original Message -
From: Ted Galerneau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 2:33 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from
In my opinion, the functionality and options of Declude surpasses any on
the market hat I have researched. It does have updates but I think that
any product that claims to effectively fight spam and Viruses will.. It is
kind of the nature of the ever changing beast.
In the end, My feeling is
We had LDAP blow up on us today. We called IPswitch support, they're
located about 35 miles North of here, and were told that they would be
available after 10:30... I'm sure there are many companies out there
willing to put out $4,995 to obtain this level of support. We were able to
Scott Fisher wrote:
Does it need to be updated often... If a new vulnerability appears and there
is a Declude fix, I would expect you'd want to update your Declude
version...
I don't think there's been too many fixes in the Declude updates;
mostly new or enhanced features. I don't know as I
Hello bpollack,
Saturday, October 30, 2004, 6:59:21 PM, you wrote:
b Yes, but that includes a year of Symantec A/V for an unlimited number of
b users. If you -want- Symantec, which is, after all, the market leader, it's
Just because someone is the market leader doesn't mean they're the
best:
-- Original Message --
From: Bruce Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 20:29:56 -0500
Until all of the in-fighting over SPF, CALLER-ID (microsuck's name for their
re-worked and re-launched version of SPF) is resolved
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Until all of the in-fighting over SPF, CALLER-ID (microsuck's name for
their
re-worked and re-launched version of SPF) is resolved and universally
adopted, the next best thing is CHALLENGE/RESPONSE.
The infighting has
Yes, but there's 56 domains reporting Caller-ID. You can't count them
outg.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Aaron Clausen
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 4:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from
- Original Message -
From: Dan Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 14:35
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
Yes, but there's 56 domains reporting Caller-ID. You can't count them
outg.
All things
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Barker
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 2:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
Yes, but there's 56 domains reporting Caller-ID. You can't count them
outg.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
All things being equal, I'd say that SPF has become the defacto standard.
not with less than 1 million SPF domains in many 10's of millions of domains.
Len
_
http://IMGate.MEIway.com : free anti-spam gateway, runs on 1000's of
to keep it that way.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of A. Clausen
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 2:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
- Original Message -
From
It's also possible that spammers will also create a new SPF of their own
until they are caught them create another. However, unless I really don't
understand the dynamics of it all, at least SPF has the promise of getting
this spam issue under control a whole lot faster
SPF is not anti-spam, it's
- Original Message -
From: A. Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, but there's 56 domains reporting Caller-ID. You can't count them
outg.
All things being equal, I'd say that SPF has become the defacto standard.
Even if Microsoft manages to pull one off here (which I doubt, as I'm sure
: Monday, November 01, 2004 15:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch
Executive Team
-- Original Message --
From: Bruce Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 20:29:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
It's also possible that spammers will also create a new SPF of their
own until they are caught them create another. However, unless I really
don't understand the dynamics of it all, at least
Len Conrad wrote:
It's also possible that spammers will also create a new SPF of their own
until they are caught them create another. However, unless I really don't
understand the dynamics of it all, at least SPF has the promise of
getting
this spam issue under control a whole lot faster
SPF is
[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
It's also possible that spammers will also create a new SPF of their own
until they are caught them create another. However, unless I really don't
understand the dynamics of it all, at least SPF has the promise of getting
this spam
Bill says
'A lot of people have fallen victim to this same misguided belief in the
past, and history has proven otherwise. In this instance, we
shall see...'
Here's one for you, HP discontinued a mid range platform(HP3000) in 2000 that many
companies run their business with. They gave us
Of Bill Foresman
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 3:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
I think it's going to be a while for anyone to reject email based on SPF.
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosityhosting.com
Office
- Original Message -
From: x [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's also possible that spammers will also create a new SPF of their
own
until they are caught them create another. However, unless I really
don't
understand the dynamics of it all, at least SPF has the promise of
getting
this spam
I speculate a lot, I know. But my guess is that 90% of the 80% of our total
emails which are spam come from forged addresses etc. Getting this up and
running yesterday would have been a good thing as I see it.
That's exactly why we added SPF support a year ago. :)
- Original Message -
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 15:27
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
- Original Message -
From: A. Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, but there's
- Original Message -
From: Bob McGregor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A lot of people have fallen victim to this same misguided belief in the
past, and history has proven otherwise. In this instance, we
shall see...'
Here's one for you, HP discontinued a mid range platform(HP3000)
in 2000
- Original Message -
From: A. Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My feeling is that MS
trying to push Sender ID through is just an example of closing the
barn
door
after the cows have come home.
A lot of people have fallen victim to this same misguided belief in the
past, and
Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
I speculate a lot, I know. But my guess is that 90% of the 80% of our total
emails which are spam come from forged addresses etc. Getting this up and
running yesterday would have been a good thing as I see it.
That's exactly why we added SPF
structure as it is today.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 4:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
- Original Message -
From: x
- Original Message -
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 16:35
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
- Original Message -
From: A. Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My feeling
- Original Message -
From: A. Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My feeling is that MS
trying to push Sender ID through is just an example of closing the
barn
door
after the cows have come home.
A lot of people have fallen victim to this same misguided belief in
the
Bill Landry wrote:
- Original Message -
From: x [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's also possible that spammers will also create a new SPF of their
own
until they are caught them create another. However, unless I really
don't
understand the dynamics of it all, at least SPF has the promise of
getting
: Monday, November 01, 2004 6:39 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
I think it's going to be a while for anyone to reject email based on SPF.
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosityhosting.com
Office: (850) 656-2644
-Original Message
apps better than linux itself does.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Len Conrad
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 3:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
It's also possible
if
I could ever feel confident about not being rooted by the bad guys.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of x
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 5:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
Ted Galerneau wrote:
Thanks Mr. X, it's looking better to me as time progresses and I may just go
for it and take the time to learn it! I was working on a control panel
solution for Windows until now, and from what I hear there are tons of them
for NIX many which are free. NIX could potentially
the majority is
going to do and way that in as well.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of x
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 9:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
Ted Galerneau wrote:
Thanks
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 22:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch
Executive Team
Bruce, please don't take offense...I think everyone is just trying to help,
trying various tactics to get the point across. Challenge/Response (CR)
results
been an extremely trying week.
Bruce Barnes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ted Galerneau
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 23:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
Yes, I believe
then blacklist us, please, because, with the exception of any
correspondence via this list, we've never sent or received a
message to or from your domain in more than 5 years - I just
scanned 5 years worth of logs to verify that.
no skin off my back. my customers want ZERO SPAM and
Yes, but that includes a year of Symantec A/V for an
unlimited number of users. If you -want- Symantec, which is,
after all, the market leader, it's actually quite a good
deal, as many users have already concluded. However, if you
-don't- want Symantec bundled in, as it currently is in
1. almost who is using Challenge/Response LOVED the service. They have
the option, on a user-by-user basis, to turn it off.
IMHO, it is a very GOOD thing and is overwhelmingly liked by the
administrations of the three school systems I talked to.
Yes, many of the people who *use* it like it.
Sounds like someone was up late watching David EmailMan...
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 7:29 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
1. almost who is using
I agree with you Scott, C/R is the most stupid invention we've ever seen at
the opposite of what e-mail is!
Laurent.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 1:29 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from
Bruce Barnes wrote:
When you are faced with loosing a group of surgery centers that generates
multi-thousands of dollars a year in revenue or finding a solution to the
spam problem, it is no longer a difficult decision.
Right up until you get listed as a spammer, and your users cannot send
30, 2004 9:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
Are you speaking of Deersoft's mail server?
Bruce Barnes wrote:
If anyone would like to have a test mailbox setup to play with, please
let me know and we will send you a username
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
Yes, I believe that is what he's talking about. That is one I haven't
looked
at just yet, hope we may not need to after tomorrow.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Bruce Barnes wrote:
Not DEERSOFT, but DEERFIELD, ie:
http://www.deerfield.com/products/categories.htm?cid=3
Gotcha, so it is Kerio I have seen mentioned here a few times.
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
, 2004 12:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
Bruce Barnes wrote:
Not DEERSOFT, but DEERFIELD, ie:
http://www.deerfield.com/products/categories.htm?cid=3
Gotcha, so it is Kerio I have seen mentioned here a few times.
To Unsubscribe
]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
Bruce Barnes wrote:
Not DEERSOFT, but DEERFIELD, ie:
http://www.deerfield.com/products/categories.htm?cid=3
Gotcha, so it is Kerio I have seen mentioned here a few times.
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support
] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
Bruce Barnes wrote:
Not DEERSOFT, but DEERFIELD, ie:
http://www.deerfield.com/products/categories.htm?cid=3
Gotcha, so it is Kerio I have seen mentioned here a few times.
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
Actually the product that we have been discussing is VisNetic Mail Server.
The link that goes directly to the product is:
http://www.deerfield.com/products/visnetic-mailserver/.
-Original Message
Hello,
Someone was asking for "Who will actually purchase ISC"? Apparently Steven loves ISC...
http://www.biosmagazine.co.uk/article.php?id=1270
HansenSent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 3:58 PMTo: Eric
CoffmanSubject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch
Executive Team
Hello,
Someone was asking for "Who will actually purchase ISC"?
Apparently Steven loves ISC...
http://www.biosmagazine.co.uk/article.php?id=1270
] On
Behalf Of Joe Hansen
Sent: Saturday,
October 30, 2004 12:58 PM
To: Eric Coffman
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A
Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
Hello,
Someone was asking for Who
will actually purchase ISC? Apparently Steven loves ISC...
http://www.biosmagazine.co.uk/article.php?id
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe
HansenSent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 3:58 PMTo: Eric
CoffmanSubject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the
Ipswitch Executive Team
Hello,
Someone was asking for "Who will actually purchase ISC"?
Apparently Steven loves ISC...
]: [IMail Forum] A
Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
are you stating that if you have domain
X.Y.Z, domain W.X.Y, domain V.W.X, domain U.V.W and domain T.U.V and you
decide to implement the collaborative features for domain W.X.Y that you
cannot collaborate within the other
] On
Behalf Of Joe Hansen
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 3:58 PM
To: Eric Coffman
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A
Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
Hello,
Someone was asking for Who
will actually purchase ISC? Apparently Steven loves ISC...
http://www.biosmagazine.co.uk/article.php?id
30, 2004 4:32
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Re[2]:
[IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
The added features
of ICS is primarily designed to be used by a company for its
messaging/collaboration needs. It is not packaged with the ISP in mind
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum]
A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
you guys know that the collaborative features only work for a
single domain, right?
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosityhosting.com
Office: (850) 656-2644
-Original
incident as I see it.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004
1:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum]
A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
The added features of ICS
Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of John
Tolmachoff (Lists)Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004
15:32To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
The added features
of ICS is primarily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum]
A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
So, if I understand the pricing correctly, from reviewing
the charges on the Ipswitchweb site, they are effectively asking to pay
the full freight for all of the modules even though we
of
the SA will be after the first year?
-Don
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 4:32 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
The added features of ICS
Corporate greed is evil, once it starts I it can
spread like a cancer.
For me, Monday's announcement is irrelevant. Ipswitch played their hand,
and allowed us to see how they truly view their customer base.
per David Karp:
I encourage all of you to download and evaluate ICS. If it doesn't meet
the cost of
the SA will be after the first year?
-Don
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 4:32 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
The added features
will be after the first year?
-Don
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 4:32 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
The added features of ICS is primarily
]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 7:02 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
Don
I don't think your software stops running when your SA expires.
Peter
- * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * -
Peter With / JRS
Judgments Collected
(866) 404-1888
(866) 537
:)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 3:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
Corporate greed is evil, once it starts I it can
spread like a cancer
Title: Message
Bruce wrote:
In addition to everything we've looking
for, it auto-verifies any incoming e-mail message the first time a message is
received from a new e-mail address and forces the sender to click on a link in
the verification message to validate they are a person and not
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter With
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 4:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
Don
I don't think your software stops running when your SA expires.
Peter
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
We are running IMail 8 unlimited (upgrading since v4). Because we offer
web
hosting need unlimited version. Our SA is up for renewal next month.
Looking
at http://www.ipswitch.com/Purchase/products
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 7:02 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
Don
I don't think your software stops running when your SA expires.
Peter
- * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * -
Peter With / JRS
Judgments
(Lists)
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004
4:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum]
A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
Bruce wrote:
In addition to everything we've looking
for, it auto-verifies any incoming e-mail message the first time a message is received
from
]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
SA for ISP version is listed to be $2295 per year. (Youch!)
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED
]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
SA for ISP version is listed to be $2295 per year. (Youch!)
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bpollack
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 4:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
Yes
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Galerneau
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 5:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
Assuming you don't need unlimited licen$ing like we
, 2004 7:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
Yes, but that includes a year of Symantec A/V for an unlimited number of
users. If you -want- Symantec, which is, after all, the market leader, it's
actually quite a good deal, as many
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 8:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
What, do we need a refresher course on the pricing?
BTW, ISP version is unlimited users, just
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bpollack
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 7:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
Yes, but that includes a year of Symantec A/V
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bpollack
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 4:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
Yes, but that includes a year of Symantec A/V for an unlimited number of
users. If you -want- Symantec
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
What, do we need a refresher course on the pricing?
BTW, ISP version is unlimited users, just without IM and WorkGroupShare.
So of course, if you have Unlimited users Standard or Premium
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
What, do we need a refresher course on the pricing?
BTW, ISP version is unlimited users, just without IM and WorkGroupShare.
So of course, if you have Unlimited users Standard or Premium, the SA will
be higher
t.blyth wrote:
Has anyone got thoughts on using Microsoft Exchange ?
I would be interested in comments.
Exchange is far more complex than the other alternatives. Is it solid?
yes. Does it have lots of good features? yes. You just have to be
willing to read a few books and pay for it. My only
[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
Bruce wrote:
In addition to
everything we've looking for, it auto-verifies any incoming e-mail message the
first time a message is received from a new e-mail address and forces the
sender to click on a link
attempting a non-secure
connection.
Bruce
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Bruce
BarnesSent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 20:30To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A
Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
Has anyone got thoughts on using Microsoft Exchange ?
I would be interested in comments.
Thanks
Terence Blyth
-- Original Message --
From: Ted Galerneau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the
Ipswitch Executive Team
Yes, but that includes a year of Symantec A/V for an
unlimited number of users. If you -want- Symantec, which is,
after all, the market leader, it's actually quite a good
deal
Title: Message
Perhaps I should retract my comment as
well, sorry!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce Barnes
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004
6:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum]
A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team
://www.vantekcommunications.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Barnes
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 6:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
1. almost who
Andeson
- Original Message -
From: bpollack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 6:59 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
Yes, but that includes a year of Symantec A/V for an unlimited number of
users
Man I just don't have the time to write an entire treatise on the subject.
iMAIL went from $1500 to $10k I simply cannot afford it anymore. I will use my 8.0
version until it dies.
I am looking at Visnetic from deerfield.com but I don't foresee a conversion for a few
years at least.
John
:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
Bill,
Unlike a previous poster here, I am not going to beg you for anything. I
will continue to use iMail only if it makes financial and technical sense
for me to do so, AND if I see
, shame on you
for shedding such a nasty light on Ipswitch!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of john cesta
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 7:51 PM
To: William Van Hefner
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
Barnes
ChicagoNetTech Inc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of William Van
Hefner
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 21:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch
Executive Team
Bruce,
Clients may love
, as we're fighting a common
foe.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 11:06 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive
Team
then blacklist us, please, because
: Saturday, October 30, 2004 5:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch
Executive Team
What, do we need a refresher course on the pricing?
BTW, ISP version is unlimited users, just without IM and WorkGroupShare.
So of course, if you have Unlimited
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
