[IMGate] Re: unknown user info lost when using multiple smtp servers

2005-02-09 Thread Len Conrad
I just realized that my unknuser2recipients_bad.sh is not working on my domains that are sent to two postfix boxes(mail is first sent to my Imgate box and then the transport.map sends the message to a second box that scans for viruses), the unknown user is sent back from Imail to the virus box,

[IMGate] Re: unknown user info lost when using multiple smtp servers

2005-02-09 Thread Andrew P. Kaplan
what a mess. I thought this was the best way to setup postfix with virusscanning. forget about unknown users. export the known users from the imail box to the MX. Some of the domains behind the virusscanner are not on Imail. -- Andrew P. Kaplan www.cshore.com We must build dikes of

[IMGate] Re: unknown user info lost when using multiple smtp servers

2005-02-09 Thread Len Conrad
I thought this was the best way to setup postfix with virusscanning. forget about unknown users. export the known users from the imail box to the MX. Some of the domains behind the virusscanner are not on Imail. if the traffic isn't too big for them, then use RAV for them, and tell

[IMGate] Re: unknown user info lost when using multiple smtp servers

2005-02-09 Thread Russ Uhte
Len Conrad wrote: I thought this was the best way to setup postfix with virusscanning. forget about unknown users. export the known users from the imail box to the MX. Some of the domains behind the virusscanner are not on Imail. if the traffic isn't too big for them, then use RAV for

[IMGate] Re: unknown user info lost when using multiple smtp servers

2005-02-09 Thread Len Conrad
The recommendation to avoid the dictionary attacks is to turn on tarpitting. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/842851/ Does anybody have experience with Exchange smtp tarpitting when the volume of unknown recipients is 20k per hour? For different tarpit delays between 5 and 30 seconds? Len