Re: [Imports-us] Colorado Address Imports

2020-01-26 Thread Elliott Plack
I did an import of 800K Baltimore County addresses (and buildings, conflated, like yours) six years ago. You’re welcome to my expansion code, which we did in SQL when pulling it out of the database. I made a special case for McNames like McDonalds or McTavern, of which we have quite a few here.

Re: [Imports-us] Colorado Address Imports

2020-01-26 Thread smocktaylor
The Mesa County address set has 89,130 addresses. The Colorado address set has 1,958,082 addresses, of which a bit less than 89,130 addresses are from Mesa County (the county data is newer). I was planning on adding it as a default datasource in the JOSM MapWithAI plugin after I had gotten

Re: [Imports-us] Colorado Address Imports

2020-01-26 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 1/25/20 18:42, smocktay...@gmail.com wrote: > eventually importing the state address > database How many addresses are there, and are there any plans to involve more people? One person importing a whole state sounds quite a burden. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail

Re: [Imports-us] Colorado Address Imports

2020-01-26 Thread smocktaylor
Thank you for linking that script. I've been making my script a bit more generic (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Colorado_Addresses#Generic_Script for what it currently looks like), and I wouldn't mind sending in a pull request sometime for ogr2osm for a generic address parser.

Re: [Imports-us] Colorado Address Imports

2020-01-26 Thread Levente Juhász
Looks like a great project. I did not dive into the data but since you are talking about expanding street types, I thought I would share a large collection of suffixes I collected for our Miami-Dade address import. I found most of these in a USPS document and also added some missing types on my

Re: [Imports-us] Colorado Address Imports

2020-01-26 Thread Mike Thompson
Clifford, We do have the Colorado Open Records Act, but I can't find anything in it that states that the records (data) have to be placed in the "public domain", only that they have to be made "publicly available." Someone with more training in the law may be able to interpret it better. Mike.