Re: [indiana-discuss] [pkg-discuss] src packages

2008-12-12 Thread Mike Meyer
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:42:25 -0600 Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote: Mike Meyer wrote: Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com wrote: A related point: for security purposes we're going to want to include cryptographic hashes of everything referenced by URL that is needed to

[indiana-discuss] upgrade facility

2008-12-12 Thread Nischal
Hi, I got the OpenSolaris2008.11 and I wanted to upgrade 2008.05 to 2008.11. I was really surprised that the GRUB didn't give me an upgrade option like it does in fedora, ubuntu etc ( i am new to opensolaris). I am rather curious why this facility has not been added. Is there any particular

Re: [indiana-discuss] upgrade facility

2008-12-12 Thread Calum Benson
On 12 Dec 2008, at 09:12, Nischal wrote: Hi, I got the OpenSolaris2008.11 and I wanted to upgrade 2008.05 to 2008.11. I was really surprised that the GRUB didn't give me an upgrade option like it does in fedora, ubuntu etc ( i am new to opensolaris). I am rather curious why this

Re: [indiana-discuss] upgrade facility

2008-12-12 Thread Shawn Walker
Calum Benson wrote: On 12 Dec 2008, at 09:12, Nischal wrote: Hi, I got the OpenSolaris2008.11 and I wanted to upgrade 2008.05 to 2008.11. I was really surprised that the GRUB didn't give me an upgrade option like it does in fedora, ubuntu etc ( i am new to opensolaris). I am rather

Re: [indiana-discuss] [pkg-discuss] src packages

2008-12-12 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:42:25AM -0600, Shawn Walker wrote: Since most open source licenses make the distributor responsible for providing the source, pointing to where you got the tarball from usually isn't sufficient to fulfil license requirements. As an example, I seem to recall the

[indiana-discuss] License Requirement was Re: [pkg-discuss] src packages

2008-12-12 Thread Shawn Walker
Nicolas Williams wrote: On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:42:25AM -0600, Shawn Walker wrote: Since most open source licenses make the distributor responsible for providing the source, pointing to where you got the tarball from usually isn't sufficient to fulfil license requirements. As an example,

Re: [indiana-discuss] [pkg-discuss] src packages

2008-12-12 Thread Shawn Walker
Mike Meyer wrote: On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:15:38 -0600 Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com wrote: The GPLv2 allows you to charge for media. Strangely enough it doesn't talk about online bandwidth. Using physical media is out for a build- from-source option is out of the question. The

Re: [indiana-discuss] License Requirement was Re: [pkg-discuss] src packages

2008-12-12 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 09:43:24AM -0600, Shawn Walker wrote: Nicolas Williams wrote: The GPLv2 allows you to charge for media. Strangely enough it doesn't talk about online bandwidth. Using physical media is out for a build- ... According to their FAQ: Yes, FAQ. But even without it

Re: [indiana-discuss] [pkg-discuss] src packages

2008-12-12 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 10:38:28AM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote: On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:15:38 -0600 Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com wrote: The GPLv2 allows you to charge for media. Strangely enough it doesn't talk about online bandwidth. Using physical media is out for a build-

[indiana-discuss] SMF for cfengine

2008-12-12 Thread Tom Georgoulias
Has anyone created an SMF configuration for cfengine? I installed the cfengine package from the blastwave repository and it doesn't include an SMF or init script to manage the cfexecd/cfservd daemons, so I'll have to come up with one myself. I figured I'd ask and see if anyone else has

Re: [indiana-discuss] src packages

2008-12-12 Thread Stephen Hahn
* Laszlo (Laca) Peter laszlo.pe...@sun.com [2008-12-12 05:06]: It would be a lot easier to run a separate pkg.depotd for source packages only and add the fmri of the source package to binary package as metadata. I was also thinking about a source packages authority and repository as a way

Re: [indiana-discuss] SMF for cfengine

2008-12-12 Thread Will Murnane
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 13:26, Tom Georgoulias t...@mcclatchyinteractive.com wrote: Has anyone created an SMF configuration for cfengine? I installed the cfengine package from the blastwave repository and it doesn't include an SMF or init script to manage the cfexecd/cfservd daemons, so I'll

Re: [indiana-discuss] unable to create zones

2008-12-12 Thread Evan Layton
Hi Gerard The only time I've seen something like this is when the network isn't working. I understand that it was working when you upgraded but make sure that it's working since the reboot from that upgrade. You may want to try restarting nwam (if you're using nwam). It almost looks like

Re: [indiana-discuss] unable to create zones

2008-12-12 Thread Free
Evan Layton wrote: Hi Gerard The only time I've seen something like this is when the network isn't working. I understand that it was working when you upgraded but make sure that it's working since the reboot from that upgrade. You may want to try restarting nwam (if you're using nwam).

[indiana-discuss] X development files not found

2008-12-12 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
I am running os0811. I was trying to compile WINE 1.1.10 (so hopefully I can run Acroread), but (after IPS-installed the flex and bison packages) got the warning message that X development files not found. Should I just install the SUNWxorg-headers? Or there are something else I need to do?

Re: [indiana-discuss] unable to create zones

2008-12-12 Thread Evan Layton
Free wrote: Evan Layton wrote: Hi Gerard The only time I've seen something like this is when the network isn't working. I understand that it was working when you upgraded but make sure that it's working since the reboot from that upgrade. You may want to try restarting nwam (if you're

Re: [indiana-discuss] X development files not found

2008-12-12 Thread Brock Pytlik
W. Wayne Liauh wrote: I am running os0811. I was trying to compile WINE 1.1.10 (so hopefully I can run Acroread), but (after IPS-installed the flex and bison packages) got the warning message that X development files not found. Should I just install the SUNWxorg-headers? Or there are

Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg uninstall without deps

2008-12-12 Thread Jon Trulson
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Glenn Lagasse wrote: * Jon Trulson (j...@radscan.com) wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Jonathan Edwards wrote: On Dec 10, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Shawn Walker wrote: Alan Coopersmith wrote: Shawn Walker wrote: Alexander wrote: Sometimes I need force uninstall single package.

Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg uninstall without deps

2008-12-12 Thread Jon Trulson
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Shawn Walker wrote: Jon Trulson wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Jonathan Edwards wrote: On Dec 10, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Shawn Walker wrote: Alan Coopersmith wrote: Shawn Walker wrote: Alexander wrote: Sometimes I need force uninstall single package. [...] I sure

Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg uninstall without deps

2008-12-12 Thread Will Young
Jon Trulson wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Shawn Walker wrote: I'd rather address as many of those cases as possible before implementing the aforementioned options, and then only as a last resort. The problem with that, is that it is impossible to predict the future and

Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg uninstall without deps

2008-12-12 Thread Shawn Walker
Will Young wrote: Jon Trulson wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Shawn Walker wrote: I'd rather address as many of those cases as possible before implementing the aforementioned options, and then only as a last resort. The problem with that, is that it is impossible to predict the

Re: [indiana-discuss] [pkg-discuss] src packages

2008-12-12 Thread Mike Meyer
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:15:38 -0600 Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com wrote: The GPLv2 allows you to charge for media. Strangely enough it doesn't talk about online bandwidth. Using physical media is out for a build- from-source option is out of the question. The fair thing to do is

Re: [indiana-discuss] X development files not found

2008-12-12 Thread Doug Leavitt
Yes, Nico * Brock are right. Wine is in the /contrib repository now. I just tried Acrobat 9 with the package in /contrib and it seemed to work fine. I have also tried a small variety of other things downloaded from tucows or similar with successful results. Doug. Brock Pytlik wrote: W. Wayne

Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg uninstall without deps

2008-12-12 Thread Jon Trulson
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Shawn Walker wrote: Will Young wrote: Jon Trulson wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Shawn Walker wrote: I'd rather address as many of those cases as possible before implementing the aforementioned options, and then only as a last resort. The problem with that,

Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg uninstall without deps

2008-12-12 Thread Shawn Walker
Jon Trulson wrote: The point is, someone with the proper privileges is not prevented from either manipulating package state or doing things that will break the system already. No, the point is that the sysadmin/superman should be able to install a package and ignore any dependency

Re: [indiana-discuss] X development files not found

2008-12-12 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
Yes, Nico * Brock are right. Wine is in the /contrib repository now. I just tried Acrobat 9 with the package in /contrib and it seemed to work fine. I have also tried a small variety of other things downloaded from tucows or similar with successful results. Doug. Brock Pytlik

Re: [indiana-discuss] X development files not found

2008-12-12 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
I am answering my own question (perhaps because it is so obvious no one bothered to write it up :-) ): hli...@hliv:~$ pfexec pkg set-authority -O http://pkg.opensolaris.org/contrib contrib hli...@hliv:~$ pfexec pkg install pkg:/w...@1.0.1,5.11-0.101:20081209T223210Z -- This message posted from

Re: [indiana-discuss] upgrade facility

2008-12-12 Thread Nischal
hi, I have an ADSL modem with USB cable(not ethernet). This modem(the USB cable) is not supported in OpenSolaris2008.05. It supported now in OpenSolaris2008.11. So without a network connection, how do I upgrade OpenSolaris2008.05 to OpenSolaris2008.11? Is it possible? I have the live cd for

Re: [indiana-discuss] X development files not found

2008-12-12 Thread Doug Leavitt
The contrib package repository is located here: http://pkg.opensolaris.org/contrib/ The following link points to the section of whats-new that discusses the various repositories. http://www.opensolaris.com/learn/features/whats-new/200811/#developer_repository Doug. W. Wayne Liauh wrote: Yes,