Hello folks :)
While updating a mounted BE I got the following
pkg: An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 2] No such
file or directory:
'/mnt/var/pkg/pkg/SUNWlang-uk/0.5.11%2C5.11-0.111%3A20090331T084040Z/manifest'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/pkg,
David,
right now I am on build 108 and I just decided to go for b111. So I ran
the updatemanager (on my for several days every day suspended/resumed
laptop). With that I only see that updatemanager offers me updates,
based on b110. Hmm... So I ran packagemanager, but see the same. So
logged
Lurie wrote:
2009.06 will be based on a variant of b111 with critical bugfixes backported
from some of the later builds.
---
There are some old notes relating to two things:
1. snv_112 (major updates vs. b110/b111)
2. snv_b115 - GNOME 2.26.0
Due to certain reported bugs in the snv_111
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
More pain from the update..TwinView refuses to behave correctly and
spans windows across the entire desktop..svn_110 BE works
/lib/opengl/ogl_select
perfectly..does anyone what changed?
Just reporting that the same
Hi Al,
I'm not aware what /lib/opengl/ogl_select/nvidia_vendor_select does,
care to elaborate? Bear in mind I am using the old quadro nvidia drivers...
Y.
Al Slater wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
More pain from the update..TwinView refuses
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
I'm not aware what /lib/opengl/ogl_select/nvidia_vendor_select does,
care to elaborate? Bear in mind I am using the old quadro nvidia drivers...
I found a reference to it when researching the problem I was having with
Thanks for that, didn't work for me unfortunately...
Al Slater wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
I'm not aware what /lib/opengl/ogl_select/nvidia_vendor_select does,
care to elaborate? Bear in mind I am using the old quadro nvidia drivers...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
Thanks for that, didn't work for me unfortunately...
I don't think I was clear, there was a stray /lib/opengl/ogl_select in
my original post. The nvidia_vendor_select fixed the compiz problem,
not the twinview problem
Thanks that make sense now...
Al Slater wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
Thanks for that, didn't work for me unfortunately...
I don't think I was clear, there was a stray /lib/opengl/ogl_select in
my original post. The
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
More pain from the update..TwinView refuses to behave correctly and
spans windows across the entire desktop..svn_110 BE works
perfectly..does anyone what changed?
(adding xwin-discuss)
Same problem here on a Ultra24, Nvidia Quadro FX 370.
The login screen is
Ken Mays wrote:
Lurie wrote:
2009.06 will be based on a variant of b111 with critical bugfixes backported from
some of the later builds.
---
There are some old notes relating to two things:
1. snv_112 (major updates vs. b110/b111)
2. snv_b115 - GNOME 2.26.0
Due to certain reported bugs in
Al Slater wrote:
Also compiz visual effects won't start. It looks like the Nvidia GLX
extensions are not loading. Running
/lib/opengl/ogl_select/nvidia_vendor_select and restarting gdm fixed
that until I rebooted.
Known issue, documented in the build 111 release notes at
Detlef drew...@sun.com wrote:
David,
right now I am on build 108 and I just decided to go for b111. So I ran
the updatemanager (on my for several days every day suspended/resumed
laptop). With that I only see that updatemanager offers me updates,
based on b110. Hmm... So I ran packagemanager,
Hi Alan:
After applying the fix:
$ svccfg -s application/opengl/ogl-select listprop options/vendor
options/vendor astring nvidia
I continue having problems with windows spanning both monitors.
Cheers.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 16:39, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote:
Al
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
David,
right now I am on build 108 and I just decided to go for b111. So I ran
the updatemanager (on my for several days every day suspended/resumed
laptop). With that I only see that updatemanager offers me updates, based on
b110. Hmm...
The fix is for the OpenGL/compiz issue - it shouldn't affect monitor spanning
in the slightest, which is why I replied to the compiz post with it, not yours.
Your monitor-spanning problem is probably something in whichever window manager
you use (metacity or compiz) - twinview makes two monitors
Aubrey Li wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
David,
right now I am on build 108 and I just decided to go for b111. So I ran
the updatemanager (on my for several days every day suspended/resumed
laptop). With that I only see that updatemanager offers me updates, based
Ahhm, Ok. Thanks for the explanation :)
I'll forward my question there.
Cheers.
2009/4/8 Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com:
The fix is for the OpenGL/compiz issue - it shouldn't affect monitor spanning
in the slightest, which is why I replied to the compiz post with it, not
yours.
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
Hello folks :)
While updating a mounted BE I got the following
pkg: An unexpected error happened during image-update: [Errno 2] No such
file or directory:
'/mnt/var/pkg/pkg/SUNWlang-uk/0.5.11%2C5.11-0.111%3A20090331T084040Z/manifest'
Traceback (most recent call
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
David,
right now I am on build 108 and I just decided to go for b111. So I ran
the updatemanager (on my for several days every day suspended/resumed
laptop). With
Aubrey Li wrote:
The same result:
$ uname -a
SunOS aubrey-penryn 5.11 snv_110 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
$ pfexec pkg authority
PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS URI
dev (preferred) origin online
http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/
$ pfexec pkg refresh
Aubrey Li wrote:
$ uname -a
SunOS aubrey-penryn 5.11 snv_110 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
$ pfexec pkg image-update
No updates available for this image.
It's a silly question, forgive me, but is it possible that you have
upgraded to b111 and just not yet rebooted into the newly activated BE?
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
The same result:
$ uname -a
SunOS aubrey-penryn 5.11 snv_110 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
$ pfexec pkg authority
PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS URI
dev (preferred) origin
Aubrey Li wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
The same result:
$ uname -a
SunOS aubrey-penryn 5.11 snv_110 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
$ pfexec pkg authority
PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS URI
dev (preferred)
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
The same result:
$ uname -a
SunOS aubrey-penryn 5.11 snv_110 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
$ pfexec pkg authority
PUBLISHER
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
$ pkg publisher dev
Publisher: dev
Alias: None
Origin URI: http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/
SSL Key: None
SSL Cert: None
Client UUID:
Aubrey Li wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
$ pkg publisher dev
Publisher: dev
Alias: None
Origin URI: http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/
SSL Key: None
SSL Cert: None
Client UUID:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
$ pkg publisher dev
Publisher: dev
Alias: None
Origin URI: http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/
SSL Key:
Aubrey Li wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
$ pkg publisher dev
Publisher: dev
Alias: None
Origin URI: http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/
Aubrey Li wrote:
Ah, okay. So you are going through a proxy.
Is this a problem? It works properly when I upgraded 109-110 on the same box.
the impression is that your proxy is giving you stale data, without
checking with the real server.
cheers,
calum.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha fa...@fajar.net wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Andrew Gaylard a...@computer.org wrote:
I have an Ultra-60 (2x400MHz CPUs, 2 GiB RAM, elite-3D graphics)
and I'm keen to install OpenSolaris. There are three wrinkles:
- the box only has a
Calum Mackay wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
Ah, okay. So you are going through a proxy.
Is this a problem? It works properly when I upgraded 109-110 on the
same box.
the impression is that your proxy is giving you stale data, without
checking with the real server.
But his wget output matches
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Calum Mackay wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
Ah, okay. So you are going through a proxy.
Is this a problem? It works properly when I upgraded 109-110 on the
same box.
the impression is that your proxy is giving you stale data, without
checking with the real server.
But his
Shawn Walker wrote:
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Calum Mackay wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
Ah, okay. So you are going through a proxy.
Is this a problem? It works properly when I upgraded 109-110 on the
same box.
the impression is that your proxy is giving you stale data, without
checking with the
Shawn Walker wrote:
Right, but as we've discovered recently, we have users that for some
reason get the correct information via wget, but not when pkg itself
initiates the connection (as an example).
We can only guess that it's something to do with how some of these proxy
or deep packet
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Right, but as we've discovered recently, we have users that for some
reason get the correct information via wget, but not when pkg itself
initiates the connection (as an example).
We can only guess that it's something to do with how some of these
~# beadm create b111
~# beadm mount b111 /mnt
~# pkg -R /mnt image-update
PHASE ITEMS
Indexing Packages840/840
DOWNLOADPKGS FILES XFER (MB)
Completed
Shawn Walker wrote:
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Right, but as we've discovered recently, we have users that for some
reason get the correct information via wget, but not when pkg itself
initiates the connection (as an example).
We can only guess that it's something to do
38 matches
Mail list logo
