Paul Gress wrote:
Paul Gress wrote:
Is it just me. I upgraded to b129 (from 128a), now my fonts look
unacceptable in Firefox and Thunderbird only. The rest of the OS is
good. When I go to System Preferences Appearance Fonts then
click on Details, Making any changes to the font
Jean-Paul Rivet wrote:
I was also getting the No updates necessary for this image while trying to go
from B128a - B129. However the command was completing cleanly and not returning any
errors.
In frustration, I started changing the repositories and publishers and am now
stuck with this
May be it is related to this bug
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=11733
I have installed the pango packages and I don't see any problems like
that shown in the picture.
-Siva
On 12/14/09 02:09 AM, Chris Ridd wrote:
On 13 Dec 2009, at 20:33, Brian Cameron wrote:
Chris:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The update doesn't seem to be working...
pfexec pkg image-update
WARNING: pkg(5) appears to be out of date, and should be updated before
running image-update. Please update pkg(5) using 'pfexec pkg install
SUNWipkg' and then retry the
On 14/12/09 14:13, Al Slater wrote:
pfexec pkg install SUNWipkg --be-name indiana-b129
You need to update SUNWipkg in your current BE, before doing the image
update, so just:
pfexec pkg install SUNWipkg
cheers,
calum.
___
indiana-discuss
Yes. I hit this. I logged a bug on it (13241), but the root cause is:
13233 /contrib packages should not depend on entire
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13233
It's listed in the email announcing build 129, along with a workaround.
Regards,
Brian
Al Slater wrote:
Sounds like:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13241
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13233
with the workaround of removing those packages from the /contrib repo
that you have installed.
Pete
Al Slater wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Al Slater wrote:
The update doesn't seem to be working...
pfexec pkg image-update
that was pfexec pkg image-update --be-name indiana-b123
WARNING: pkg(5) appears to be out of date, and should be updated before
running image-update. Please
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 14:23 +, Peter Dennis - Sustaining Engineer
wrote:
Sounds like:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13241
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13233
with the workaround of removing those packages from the /contrib repo
that you have
dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 14:23 +, Peter Dennis - Sustaining Engineer
wrote:
Sounds like:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13241
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13233
with the workaround of removing those packages from the /contrib
On 12/12/2009 00:42, david.co...@sun.com wrote:
The OpenSolaris development package repository
http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/
has been updated to reflect the changes up to and including snv_129 for
both x86/x64 and SPARC platforms. This update includes fixes to the
Caiman Slim Install
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Paul Gress wrote:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 Dec 13 01:24 10-autohint.conf
- /etc/fonts/conf.avail/10-autohint.conf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 Dec 13 01:24
10-sub-pixel-bgr.conf - /etc/fonts/conf.avail/10-sub-pixel-bgr.conf
lrwxrwxrwx 1
This turned out to be user error.
On 13/12/09 17:23, Calum Mackay wrote:
$ pkg image-update -v --be-name osol-129
...
DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB)
SUNWgnome-spell 0/738 16/12504 0.3/309.2
pkg: An unexpected error happened while preparing for image-update:
...
File
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 15:42 +, Chris Ridd wrote:
On 4 Dec 2009, at 17:35, Chris Ridd wrote:
On 4 Dec 2009, at 17:27, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Chris Ridd wrote:
Font rendering is still affected in 128a - did a bug get raised for this?
6904057 Fontconfig configuration in
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 14:33 -0600, Brian Cameron wrote:
Chris:
Note that Firefox uses proportional fonts while gnome-terminal uses
monospace fonts. Proportional and monospace fonts *should* look different.
I don't believe that to be the case. Firefox displays monospace fonts
when told.
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 00:07 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
bash-4.0$ cd /etc/fonts/conf.d
bash-4.0$ ls -al 10*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 Dec 13 01:24 10-autohint.conf
- /etc/fonts/conf.avail/10-autohint.conf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 Dec 13 01:24
Sebastien Roy wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 00:07 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
bash-4.0$ cd /etc/fonts/conf.d
bash-4.0$ ls -al 10*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 Dec 13 01:24 10-autohint.conf
- /etc/fonts/conf.avail/10-autohint.conf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 Dec 13
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 11:19 -0500, Paul Gress wrote:
Sebastien Roy wrote:
I'm a bit puzzled with the way this thread is going. Are folks
seriously suggesting that all users should manually create symbolic
links in /etc/fonts/conf.d/ after having installed OpenSolaris as a
prerequisite
On 14/12/2009 15:00, Rob McMahon wrote:
I've seen this problem mentioned before, but I can't find the message.
Okay, I found the message(s) and the bugs. I obviously didn't look hard
enough.
OSError: [Errno 20] Not a directory: '//usr/share/locale/de_DE'
pkg: This is an internal error.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Dennis - Sustaining Engineer wrote:
Sounds like:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13241
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13233
with the workaround of removing those packages from the /contrib repo
that
Alan:
We removed them because it didn't make sense to have all of them present,
since they give conflicting settings - My pixels are ordered Blue/Green/Red
left-to-right, and Red/Green/Blue left-to-right, and Blue/Green/Red top to
bottom and Red/Green/Blue top to bottom. - and the default
Having upgraded to build 129, I now find that time-slider seems not to
work at all.
I'm not seeing any snapshots created at all, for either rpool or tank,
with no apparent reason. Services are all enabled, no apparent errors.
The verbose setting seems to have gone, from the time-slider
Sebastien Roy wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 00:07 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
bash-4.0$ cd /etc/fonts/conf.d
bash-4.0$ ls -al 10*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 Dec 13 01:24 10-autohint.conf
- /etc/fonts/conf.avail/10-autohint.conf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 Dec 13
Brian Cameron wrote:
We removed them because it didn't make sense to have all of them present,
since they give conflicting settings - My pixels are ordered
Blue/Green/Red
left-to-right, and Red/Green/Blue left-to-right, and Blue/Green/Red
top to
bottom and Red/Green/Blue top to bottom. - and
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 09:38 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Sebastien Roy wrote:
I'm a bit puzzled with the way this thread is going. Are folks
seriously suggesting that all users should manually create symbolic
links in /etc/fonts/conf.d/ after having installed OpenSolaris as a
dick hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl writes:
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 14:23 +, Peter Dennis - Sustaining Engineer
wrote:
Sounds like:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13241
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13233
with the workaround of removing those packages
To apply Rendering setting to the menu, title bar, dialog of Firefox, you
need to make it repaint.
e.g. Press Ctrl+N for a new window.
To apply this setting to web pages, you need to refresh the page.
This setting works for me with Firefox 3.5.5 on snv_129.
I don't have /etc/fonts/conf.d/10-*
Finally I understood this thread is about Firefox / Thunderbird doesn't respect
Font Rendering Details setting.
Firefox / Thunderbird respects Mono, Best shapes, Best contrast, LCDs but not
details.
This should be a defect.
Searched in bugzilla, it is,
28 matches
Mail list logo
