On 14/12/09 14:13, Al Slater wrote:
pfexec pkg install SUNWipkg --be-name indiana-b129
You need to update SUNWipkg in your current BE, before doing the image
update, so just:
pfexec pkg install SUNWipkg
cheers,
calum.
___
indiana-discuss
This turned out to be user error.
On 13/12/09 17:23, Calum Mackay wrote:
$ pkg image-update -v --be-name osol-129
...
DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB)
SUNWgnome-spell 0/738 16/12504 0.3/309.2
pkg: An unexpected error happened while preparing for image-update:
...
File /usr/lib/python2.4
Having upgraded to build 129, I now find that time-slider seems not to
work at all.
I'm not seeing any snapshots created at all, for either rpool or tank,
with no apparent reason. Services are all enabled, no apparent errors.
The verbose setting seems to have gone, from the time-slider
thanks much indeed, Andrew, that was it precisely.
I had the same problem on a fresh install of 128a. It looks like
time-slider won't recursively snapshot from the top level.
I've logged a bug:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13301
thanks again.
cheers,
calum.
Anyone else seeing this (error appended]?
This looks like bug 12986; but is the same PKG_CACHEDIR=/var/tmp/
safe to use here when upgrading the entire incorporation?
I tried to install just SUNWgnome-spell, but it tells me No updates
necessary for this image.
cheers,
calum.
$ pkg
thanks Shawn,
You can't use PKG_CACHEDIR=/var/tmp at the moment due to:
12986 cross-device link traceback on install
I thought that was the workaround for 12986, no?
Try not setting PKG_CACHEDIR at all.
I am not setting it, in any case. I was just wondering whether it was
safe to
thanks,
That entirely depends on how your filesystem is setup/split.
That workaround should work if you are using the default filesystem
setup that an install from an OpenSolaris LiveCD gives you.
I think I am; I installed 127 from USB, into a 100GB partition of a
larger disk.
On 14/12/09 01:01, Shawn Walker wrote:
Given that, would you suggest it reasonable to try
PKG_CACHEDIR=/var/tmp for the image-update to 129?
Yes, it should work.
It seems to be proceeding normally now, with that workaround; it's
certainly got further than the previous repeatable failure on
I was hoping someone might be able to help me discover why I'm not
getting auto snapshots of my data pool, please?
I've a system installed with build 127, and upgraded to 128a.
Two pools:
ca...@miles:~$ zpool list
NAMESIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
rpool 99.5G 9.42G
On 09/11/09 15:48, Detlef Drewanz wrote:
I am using OpenSolaris b126 and wondering why crtl+alt+backspace no
longer kills my xsession. I already played around with the DontZAP
feature in xorg.conf, but that did'nt changed something. I am not sure
which build was the last where it worked.
There
On 09/11/09 15:57, Calum Mackay wrote:
There was a change in build 124, I think; see attached.
or not... try again...
cheers,
calum.
Subject:
Re: [indiana-discuss] CAB change in X between 123 and 124?
From:
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com
Date:
Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:31:27 -0700
On 27/10/09 15:05, Anil wrote:
Does this look familiar? Unfortunately, no crash dumps were available!
that looks like bug 6877954, fixed in build 125.
cheers,
calum.
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 17/09/09 03:22, Shasha su wrote:
Do we have identified hardware list on opensolaris?
here's an OpenSolaris Hardware Compatibility List:
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/data/os/
cheers,
calum.
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
I'm having some trouble installing 0906 for dual-boot with an already
installed Ubuntu.
I've made three primary partitions, as part of the Ubuntu install; I
want to do the OpenSolaris install last, so I get its GRUB, of course.
2GB Linux swap
73GB Linux
75GB Solaris
question: what
Calum Mackay wrote:
I'm having some trouble installing 0906 for dual-boot with an already
installed Ubuntu.
So far, trying a few things (e.g. Linux swap), the 0906 installer hangs
at 99% with complete transfer process, stuck because of bootadm
update-menu hanging.
I'll try making the Solaris
Tim Foster wrote:
I checked Thunderbird just now, and couldn't see how to get it even run
an external command when a filter matches.
I believe you can do this via some extensions; see e.g. FiltaQuilla, Yamb.
cheers,
c.
___
indiana-discuss mailing
Bob Doolittle wrote:
This depends on the action of course. I don't see a way to cause
Thunderbird to move a message to a different folder based on a filter
match,
that's standard functionality; see Tools - Message Filters - New
cheers,
c.
___
Gilles Gravier wrote:
No, because the dependency graph for milestone/network requires one of
the instances of network/physical to be online, and milestone/network
in turn has many dependents. Enable either network/physical:nwam or
network/physical:default (the latter is effectively a no-op if
Aubrey Li wrote:
$ uname -a
SunOS aubrey-penryn 5.11 snv_110 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
$ pfexec pkg image-update
No updates available for this image.
It's a silly question, forgive me, but is it possible that you have
upgraded to b111 and just not yet rebooted into the newly activated BE?
Aubrey Li wrote:
Ah, okay. So you are going through a proxy.
Is this a problem? It works properly when I upgraded 109-110 on the same box.
the impression is that your proxy is giving you stale data, without
checking with the real server.
cheers,
calum.
20 matches
Mail list logo
