On 03/23/10 02:48 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
*
*Full production level support
Both Standard and Premium support offerings are available for deployment of
Open HA Cluster 2009.06 with OpenSolaris 2009.06 with following
configurations:
*
etc. etc. etc.
what i understand is that support is limited
Sorry to beat the dead horse, but I've just found perhaps the only
written proof that OpenSolaris is supportable. For those of you who
deny that this is an issue, its existence as a supported OS has been
recently erased from every other place I've seen on the Oracle sites.
Everyone please grab a
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Jacob Ritorto jacob.rito...@gmail.comwrote:
Sorry to beat the dead horse, but I've just found perhaps the only
written proof that OpenSolaris is supportable. For those of you who
deny that this is an issue, its existence as a supported OS has been
recently
Wow, they actually did the right thing in the end. This is fantastic.
I'm all too happy to eat as much crow as you have to offer. I wonder
when (if?) they'll bring back the ability to purchase OpenSolaris
subscriptions online..
I'm actually so happy right now that I even appreciate Tim's
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Henrik Johansen hen...@scannet.dk wrote:
On 02/22/10 03:35 PM, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
On 02/22/10 09:19, Henrik Johansen wrote:
On 02/22/10 02:33 PM, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
On 02/22/10 06:12, Henrik Johansen wrote:
Well - once thing that makes me feel a bit
You (Jacob Ritorto) wrote:
FWIW, I suspect that this situation does not warrant a Wait and See
response. We're being badly mistreated here and it's probably too
late to do anything about it. Probably the only chance to quell this
poor stewardship is to get big and loud right away. Then we
2010/2/22 Matthias Pfützner matth...@pfuetzner.de:
You (Jacob Ritorto) wrote:
FWIW, I suspect that this situation does not warrant a Wait and See
response. We're being badly mistreated here and it's probably too
late to do anything about it. Probably the only chance to quell this
poor
I'm not sure how there is mistreatment when known that Solaris 10 is the
current production-grade product and OpenSolaris, for all intents and
purposes, a beta product that is currently under active development. I
was actually surprised when SUN provided a level of support for
OpenSolaris
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Jacob Ritorto jacob.rito...@gmail.com
wrote:
2010/2/22 Matthias Pfützner matth...@pfuetzner.de:
You (Jacob Ritorto) wrote:
FWIW, I suspect that this situation does not warrant a Wait and See
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jacob Ritorto jacob.rito...@gmail.com
Cc: matth...@pfuetzner.de, zfs-disc...@opensolaris.org,
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
Gesendet: 22.2.'10, 21:21
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:12 AM,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Justin Lee Ewing
jlew...@jrleindustries.com wrote:
I'm not sure how there is mistreatment when known that Solaris 10 is the
current production-grade product and OpenSolaris, for all intents and
purposes, a beta product that is currently under active
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jacob Ritorto jacob.rito...@gmail.com
Cc: zfs-disc...@opensolaris.org, indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
Gesendet: 22.2.'10, 21:46
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Justin Lee Ewing
jlew...@jrleindustries.com wrote:
I'm not sure how there is mistreatment
Matthias Pfützner wrote:
(change in control) and the cycle of the next version of OSOL (did you
notice, that it might be 2010.03, and not 2010.02, aka 7 months?)
9 months actually since 2009.06, and that change was mostly due to aligning
with the Solaris 10 update release schedules so that the
Oops, sorry, right, 9 months... ;-)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com
Cc: jacob.rito...@gmail.com, zfs-disc...@opensolaris.org,
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org, t...@cook.ms
Gesendet: 22.2.'10, 22:03
Matthias Pfützner wrote:
(change in control)
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Jacob Ritorto jacob.rito...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/2/22 Matthias Pfützner matth...@pfuetzner.de:
You (Jacob Ritorto) wrote:
FWIW, I suspect that this situation does not warrant a Wait and See
response. We're being badly mistreated here and it's probably too
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Jacob Ritorto jacob.rito...@gmail.comwrote:
Since it seems you have absolutely no grasp of what's happening here,
Coming from the guy proclaiming the sky is falling without actually having
ANY official statement whatsoever to back up that train of thought.
16 matches
Mail list logo
