On 30 Apr 2010, at 04:35, Dave Johnson wrote:
502018 Euro for WHAT? How crazy is Oracle? They provided one of the
best browsers on the planet for Solaris and Oracle did what? Ask for
money? IMO the manager responsible at Oracle should be fired.
The Opera legal folks is looking into
Dear All,
Having enabled pam_list in /etc/pam.conf I can then happily control who can log
on via ssh and that works fine.
HOWEVER, once pam_list is included in /etc/pam.conf then console logins ALL
fail with messages
such as
Hi Dave,
as Casper Dik suggested in opensolaris-discuss@, you have misconfigured
the system. I hoped man page is clear enough with EXAMPLES section...
pam_list is not authentication but account module.
Best regards,
Milam
Dave Price píše v pá 30. 04. 2010 v 04:10 -0700:
Dear All,
Having
Dear Milam, Yes, thanks. I spotted casper's reply and one from Darren. All now
fixed. I comment on another weird PAM issue we had earlier this week in the
end of my reply to casper. I wonder about posting that as another thread
somewhere Thanks,
Dave Price
--
This message posted from
On 30 Apr 2010, at 13:25, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
Nothing odd about that at all, unless you like all the Apple vs. Adobe
public fights.
No, I just like honesty.
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Interaction Designer Oracle Corporation, Ireland
mailto:calum.ben...@oracle.com
No changes in the core X packages in Nevada build 139 will need updates to
the IPS distro-import package definitions for those packages. However,
John Martin has provided updates to the nvidia-graphics manifest which
have been forwarded to David already.
As usual, this only lists the changes
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Calum Benson calum.ben...@oracle.comwrote:
On 30 Apr 2010, at 04:35, Dave Johnson wrote:
502018 Euro for WHAT? How crazy is Oracle? They provided one of the
best browsers on the planet for Solaris and Oracle did what? Ask for
money? IMO the manager
