Re: [efloraofindia:324279] Spermacoce remota Lam. (?) from Assam.

I mean here S.remota is correct. On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 at 09:11, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Paradesi ji. > > On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 18:52, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < > paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> it"s correct Garg Ji. >> With Regards. >> >> >> On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 14:41, J.M. Garg

Re: [efloraofindia:324278] Rajgad, Dec 2014 :: Requesting ID of this plant :: ARKMAR-12/12

Seems to Pimpinella sp. please check it with local floras for sp. With kind regards. On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 at 09:18, J.M. Garg wrote: > Pl. check comparative images at Apiaceae > > > -- Forwarded message - >

Re: [efloraofindia:324277] Fwd: SK779 07 OCT-2017:ID

yes, sir, You're right, I observed one character here, Flowers axillary terminal many-flowered clusters...Could be Oldenlandia auricularia, Check it once. earlier I checked within the Spermacoce, When you check within that very similar to 'remota' but I realize now. With kind regards. On

Re: [efloraofindia:324277] Re: Requesting ID of this tree - Michigan, USA : 19062013 : ARK-02

This has been identified as Acer platanoides by Vijayasankar ji in the family week here Regards Alka Khare On Thursday, September 26, 2013 at 9:40:21 AM UTC+5:30, Alka Khare wrote: > > Resurfacing for specific ID please... > >

Re: [efloraofindia:324274] Fwd: SK779 07 OCT-2017:ID

Thanks, Paradesi ji, But I am not convinced. Pl. see images and details at Spermacoce remota On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 18:29, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > It seems to

[efloraofindia:324273] Pectielis Korigadensis

Pankaj ji and Friends, Jeewan Jajal & J Jayanthi, BSI scientists have published a paper (Phytotaxa, 2018) describing a terrestrial orchid Pectilielis Korigadens from Koriagad area near Amby valley, Lonavala. Description seems similar to P. gigantea. Can someone please post a copy of the paper

Re: [efloraofindia:324270] Fwd: Plant from Chhattisgarh 2

Thanks, Paradesi ji. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 19:00, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > S. aurticularis only, > With kind regards. > > > > On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 13:00, JM Garg wrote: > >> Although not clearly visible, corolla tube should be long. >> It should be

Re: [efloraofindia:324270] SL 21 151113

Thanks a lot, Santhosh ji. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 19:03, Dr E S Santhosh Kumar < santhoshkuma...@gmail.com> wrote: > S.hispida > > > SANTHOSH > .. > Dr. E S SANTHOSH KUMAR MSc, PhD, FIAT, FABSc, FLS > *Jawaharlal Nehru

Re: [efloraofindia:324270] Re: Goa, May 2019 :: Tree for ID :: ARK2019-33

If so, pl. post the original image. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 19:31, Alka Khare wrote: > Hello Radha ji > > I think this tree was growing wild. It was captured in a fort in South Goa > (Cabo de Rama) and was growing on the slope reaching out to the sea. > > I do not have any further pics. > The

Re: [efloraofindia:324269] Re: Goa, May 2019 :: Tree for ID :: ARK2019-33

Thanks, Mahadeswara ji. On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 10:24, Mahadeswara wrote: > Very doubtful suggestion : leaves have some resemblance to Cananga. > > On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 11:34:52 AM UTC+5:30, Alka Khare wrote: >> >> Hello friends >> >> Requesting to please ID this shrub/tree captured on a

Fwd: [efloraofindia:324268] Banglore-Ooty November 2013 :: Requesting ID of this plant :: 26112013 :: ARK-03

Forwarding again for Id assistance please. -- Forwarded message - From: Alka Khare Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 at 10:39 Subject: [efloraofindia:175736] Banglore-Ooty November 2013 :: Requesting ID of this plant :: 26112013 :: ARK-03 To: Hello friends Requesting to please ID this

Re: [efloraofindia:324265] efloraofindia:''For Id wild herb with lilac flowers at Talegaon Dabhade :Jan 2016: MR-04”

Thanks, Paradesi ji. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 18:59, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, it's S. articularis. > With regards. > > On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 13:07, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Although not clearly visible, corolla tube should be long. >> It should be

Re: [efloraofindia:324264] Fwd: ID please

Thanks, Paradesi ji. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 18:54, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, it's S. exilis only. > With regards. > > > On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 14:35, JM Garg wrote: > >> It should be *Spermacoce exilis* >>

Re: [efloraofindia:324263] Spermacoce remota Lam. (?) from Assam.

Thanks, Paradesi ji. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 18:52, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > it"s correct Garg Ji. > With Regards. > > > On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 14:41, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> I think it should be *Spermacoce pusilla* Wall. >>

Re: [efloraofindia:324262] 280619TH1- Photograph for Identification

Hi, Tariqul ji, Pl. do not post another species in the same mail. Pl. send it to me or post with proper and unique subject to indiantreepix@googlegroups.com On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 23:05, drmthasan wrote: > Which is this species > > On Friday, June 28, 2019 at 11:22:19 AM UTC+6, Paradesi

Re: [efloraofindia:324262] Requesting ID of this plant - Lohagad : 23082013 : ARK-01 : August 2013

Re-opening this thread. This was identified as Vitex negundo as per Requesting ID of this Vitex sp - Lohagad : 26082013 : ARK-02 : August 2013. Apologies for the duplicate post. Would appreciate expert opinion. Regards Alka

[efloraofindia:324261] Re: Sinhagad, Aug 2014 :: Requesting ID of this grass :: ARKSEP-13

This has been identified as Spodiopogon rhizophorus as per Grass for ID :: Sinhagad, Aug 2014 :: ARK2019-14 . Regards Alka Khare On Friday, September 19, 2014 at 8:24:42 AM UTC+5:30, Alka Khare wrote: > > Thank you Gosavi ji

Re: [efloraofindia:324260] Rajgad, Dec 2014 :: Requesting ID of this plant :: ARKMAR-12/12

Resurfacing for ID please. Thanks and regards Alka Khare On Saturday, March 28, 2015 at 6:54:14 PM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > > Forwarding again for Idassistance please. > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Alka Khare > > Date: 19 March 2015 at 22:12 > Subject:

Re: [efloraofindia:324259] 280619TH1- Photograph for Identification

Which is this species On Friday, June 28, 2019 at 11:22:19 AM UTC+6, Paradesi Anjaneyulu wrote: > > Seems to be Oldenlandia biflora. > > On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 08:53, J.M. Garg > > wrote: > >> Appears to be from Rubiaceae >>

Re: [efloraofindia:324258] 280619TH1- Photograph for Identification

Which is this species On Friday, June 28, 2019 at 11:22:19 AM UTC+6, Paradesi Anjaneyulu wrote: > > Seems to be Oldenlandia biflora. > > On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 08:53, J.M. Garg > > wrote: > >> Appears to be from Rubiaceae >>

Re: [efloraofindia:324257] Bamboo for ID :: Kanha, MP Tour :: ARKJAN04

The flowering looks like Dendrocalamus strictus flowers in efi. Can this be Dendrocalamus strictus? Would greatly appreciate feedback. Thanks and regards Alka Khare On Monday, February 13, 2017 at 12:59:20 PM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > >

Fwd: [efloraofindia:324254] Rotala sp.------for id

Yes looks like it.thanks Satish Nikam -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on

Re: [efloraofindia:324252] Impatiens Species identification

Yes Saroj ji, it is Impatiens scullyi. Best regards Ashutosh Sharma On Fri 28 Jun, 2019, 4:54 PM Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > Is not it Impatiens scullyi Hook.f.Ashutosh Ji ? > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 6:32 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> >> >> -- Forwarded

Re: [efloraofindia:324252] Re: Banglore-Ooty November 2013 :: Requesting ID of this plant :: 26112013 :: ARK-03

Re-opening this thread for ID please, if possible. Regards Alka Khare On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 at 7:23:30 PM UTC+5:30, Alka Khare wrote: > > Thank you Gargji and Kanchi ji for providing a lead, let us wait for other > feedback. > > Regards > Alka Khare > > On Saturday, January 4, 2014

[efloraofindia:324251] Re: Goa, May 2019 :: Tree for ID :: ARK2019-33

Hello Radha ji I think this tree was growing wild. It was captured in a fort in South Goa (Cabo de Rama) and was growing on the slope reaching out to the sea. I do not have any further pics. The leaves seem to have a gland on the reverse side. Unfortunately, I also cannot upload any cropped

Re: [efloraofindia:324249] 04092013 BRS 510

Am also agree with S. articularis. With kind regards. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 12:54, J.M. Garg wrote: > Although not visible, corolla tube should be long. > It should be *Spermacoce articularis* >

Re: [efloraofindia:324248] Spermacoce hispida L. SN Oct 22

Yes, it's S. articularis only, Clearly corolla tube two times longer than the lobes. With kind regards. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 12:58, J.M. Garg wrote: > It should be *Spermacoce articularis* >

Re: [efloraofindia:324247] Spermacoce hispida L. SN Oct 22

Yes, it's aurticularis only, Clearly corolla tube two times longer than the lobes. With kind regards. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 12:58, J.M. Garg wrote: > It should be *Spermacoce articularis* >

Re: [efloraofindia:324246] Spermacoce hispida L. SN Oct 22

Yes, it's aurticulatus only, Clearly corolla tube two times longer than the lobes. With kind regards. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 12:58, J.M. Garg wrote: > It should be *Spermacoce articularis* >

Re: [efloraofindia:324246] Bangalore-Ooty November 2013 :: Requesting ID of this plant at Ooty :: 16122013 :: ARK-19

Could this be Bidens aurea as well? Regards Alka Khare On Sunday, January 5, 2014 at 7:37:26 PM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Alka Khare > > Date: 16 December 2013 10:47 > Subject:

Re: [efloraofindia:324245] Re: Bangalore-Ooty November 2013 :: Requesting ID of this plant at Ooty :: 15122013 :: ARK-16

This seems to be a duplicate post to Bangalore-Ooty November 2013 :: Requesting ID of this plant at Ooty :: 15122013 :: ARK-16 It has been identified as Bidens aurea. Regards Alka Khare On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 at

Re: [efloraofindia:324243] SL 21 151113

S.hispida SANTHOSH .. Dr. E S SANTHOSH KUMAR MSc, PhD, FIAT, FABSc, FLS *Jawaharlal Nehru Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute (JNTBG),* Palode, Karimancode P.O. Thiruvananthapuram-695562 Kerala, India Mobile: +91

Re: [efloraofindia:324242] Fwd: Plant from Chhattisgarh 2

S. aurticularis only, With kind regards. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 13:00, JM Garg wrote: > Although not clearly visible, corolla tube should be long. > It should be *Spermacoce articularis* >

[efloraofindia:324242] Re: Goa, May 2019 :: Tree for ID :: ARK2019-33

Hi Alka, do you have any close ups of the leaves? I see what look like cashew trees around and also coconut leaves. Is this tree wild or was it planted? regards Radha On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 11:34:52 AM UTC+5:30, Alka Khare wrote: > > Hello friends > > Requesting to please ID this

Re: [efloraofindia:324240] efloraofindia:''For Id wild herb with lilac flowers at Talegaon Dabhade :Jan 2016: MR-04”

Yes, it's S. articularis. With regards. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 13:07, J.M. Garg wrote: > Although not clearly visible, corolla tube should be long. > It should be *Spermacoce articularis* >

Re: [efloraofindia:324239] Fwd: ID please

Yes, it's S. exilis only. With regards. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 14:35, JM Garg wrote: > It should be *Spermacoce exilis* > > as > per comparative images at *Spermacoce* >

Re: [efloraofindia:324238] Spermacoce remota Lam. (?) from Assam.

it"s correct Garg Ji. With Regards. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 14:41, J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it should be *Spermacoce pusilla* Wall. > > as > per comparative images at Spermacoce >

Re: [efloraofindia:324238] Requesting ID of this plant - Lonavala :: 30102013 :: ARK-01 :: October 2013

A suggestion has been Ixora polyantha. Would like to have expert opinion. Thanks and regards Alka Khare On Tuesday, July 8, 2014 at 10:40:46 AM UTC+5:30, Alka Khare wrote: > > Resurfacing for ID please > > Regards > Alka Khare > > On Friday, March 7, 2014 7:25:53 PM UTC+5:30, Alka Khare

Re: [efloraofindia:324236] Spermacoce pusilla for confirmation

No it's not pusilla, very similar to S. remota. With regards. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 17:18, Mohina Macker wrote: > Dear Garg ji > thank you for confirming the identification > regards > mohina > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 3:12 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> I think it should be *Spermacoce remota* >>

Re: [efloraofindia:324235] Fwd: SK779 07 OCT-2017:ID

It seems to S. remota. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 17:49, J.M. Garg wrote: > This may also turn out to be *Spermacoce alata* Aubl. > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Saroj Kasaju

[efloraofindia:324234] Spermacoce‎ (Rubiaceae‎) page with images of species in efloraofindia

Dear members, Pl. go through *Spermacoce* *‎* (*Rubiaceae* *‎*) page with images of species in efloraofindia. If you find any incorrect

[efloraofindia:324229] Re: SK714 14 AUG-2017:ID

Main worry seems to be that the inflorescence in Saroj ji's post seems to be terminal. However, on going through description in Flora of China (Inflorescences axillary and infrequently apparently also terminal, 6-15 mm in diam., few

Re: [efloraofindia:324227] Spermacoce articularis for confirmation

Dear Garg ji thank you for confirming the identification regards mohina On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 2:28 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > It should be *Spermacoce hispida* L. > > as > per comparative images

Re: [efloraofindia:324227] Spermacoce pusilla for confirmation

Dear Garg ji thank you for confirming the identification regards mohina On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 3:12 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it should be *Spermacoce remota* > > as per comparative images

Re: [efloraofindia:324226] Impatiens Species identification

Is not it Impatiens scullyi Hook.f.Ashutosh Ji ? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 6:32 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Ashutosh Sharma > Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 at 07:47 > Subject: [efloraofindia:278488] Impatiens Species identification

Re: [efloraofindia:324225] Cordia vestita submission

Nice presentation. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 4:08 PM Ashutosh Sharma < ashutoshsharma1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Respected members, > > Cordia vestita > Common Name - Bairola > Family - Boraginaceae > > Photographed at Neri, Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh > In May 2019 >

Re: [efloraofindia:324224] ID of sp. of Rubiaceae from Assam KD 03 Oct.

Thanks, Lalithamba ji. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 16:10, Lalithamba Avadhanam wrote: > Yes, it is you are right. > A.Lalithamba > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 2:47 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> I think it should be *Spermacoce remota* >>

Re: [efloraofindia:324222] efloraindia: 170911 BRS27

Thanks, Paradesi ji. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 16:33, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Seems to be Oldenlandia umbellata. > > On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 15:42, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Could not find a match as per comparative images at Spermacoce >>

Re: [efloraofindia:324222] MS/2019/6/1 - Xanthostemon youngii

Seems correct ID. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 6:20 PM M Swamy wrote: > The photographs, taken during last week in my home garden, are attached. > Xanthostemon youngii is commonly known as crimson penda or red penda, is > a species of trees found only (endemic) in North

Re: [efloraofindia:324221] SL 21 151113

Thanks, Paradesi ji. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 16:35, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > it's dumb sure S. hispida, sir. > With kind regards. > > On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 15:21, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> It should be *Spermacoce hispida* L. >>

Re: [efloraofindia:324220] SL 21 151113

it's dumb sure S. hispida, sir. With kind regards. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 15:21, J.M. Garg wrote: > It should be *Spermacoce hispida* L. > > as > per comparative images at *Spermacoce* >

Re: [efloraofindia:324219] efloraindia: 170911 BRS27

Seems to be Oldenlandia umbellata. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 15:42, J.M. Garg wrote: > Could not find a match as per comparative images at Spermacoce > ‎ > > May be from some other genus. > > -- Forwarded

Re: [efloraofindia:324218] Konkan, May 2014 :: Requesting ID of this herb :: 16JUN014 :: ARK-28

Possibly Neanotis so. But id cannot be conclusive.RegardsAdittya On Friday, June 28, 2019, 12:59:55 PM GMT+5:30, J.M. Garg wrote: Although not clearly visible, corolla tube should be long. It should be Spermacoce articularis as per comparative images at Spermacoce and as per keys at

Re: [efloraofindia:324217] Impatiens species identification

Yes it is , Ashutosh Ji ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 6:35 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Ashutosh Sharma > Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 at 08:09 > Subject: [efloraofindia:279325] Impatiens species identification > To: indiantreepix >

[efloraofindia:324216] Re: SK1911 12 May 2019

Okay. Thanks for letting me know. Regards On Fri 28 Jun, 2019, 4:08 PM Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > Yes Navendu ji it is not Dichroa . > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 9:03 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Navendu ji. >> I think it may be *Hydrangea anomala* D. Don >>

[efloraofindia:324215] Re: SK2003 15 June 2019 - Mycophyta

Cantharellus cibarius ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 7:26 AM Mahesh kumar adhikari < mah...@mkadhikari.com.np> wrote: > Check with Cantharellus sp > > > > > >

Re: [efloraofindia:324213] ID of sp. of Rubiaceae from Assam KD 03 Oct.

Yes, it is you are right. A.Lalithamba On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 2:47 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it should be *Spermacoce remota* > > as per comparative images at *Spermacoce* >

[efloraofindia:324214] Re: SK714 14 AUG-2017:ID

Thanks Saroj ji. I will add that note in my names database. Regards. Dinesh On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 4:07 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Dear Dinesh Ji, > > The Nepali name is actually for B. articularis but different links have > different syn. > So I am not sure which is the correct one . > > Thank

[efloraofindia:324212] Re: SK1911 12 May 2019

Yes Navendu ji it is not Dichroa . Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 9:03 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Navendu ji. > I think it may be *Hydrangea anomala* D. Don >

[efloraofindia:324211] Re: SK714 14 AUG-2017:ID

Dear Dinesh Ji, The Nepali name is actually for B. articularis but different links have different syn. So I am not sure which is the correct one . Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 4:16 PM Dinesh Valke wrote: > Thanks Saroj ji for local name of *S. hispida*. > > I think the

[efloraofindia:324210] Re: Amomum subulatum Roxb.

Thank you Dr. Sabu. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 9:04 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, Sabu ji. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Mamiyil Sabu > Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 20:07 > Subject: Re: Amomum subulatum Roxb. > To: J.M. Garg > > > It is a cultivar of Amomum

[efloraofindia:324209] Re: SK714 14 AUG-2017:ID

Thanks Saroj ji for local name of *S. hispida*. I think the posted plant could be *S. alata* ... there seems slight variation in leaves. Hoping those familiar to, will comment and validate. Here is one good page to check for *S. alata* ... Urban Forest

[efloraofindia:324208] Re: SK47JUL23-2016:ID

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 1:54 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Sorry. > Correct wording should be > Closest I can reach is *Spermacoce hispida* L. > > as > per

[efloraofindia:324207] Re: SK779 07 OCT-2017:ID

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 3:48 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > It should be *Spermacoce hispida* L. > > as > per comparative images at *Spermacoce* >

[efloraofindia:324206] Re: SK714 14 AUG-2017:ID

Thank you Mr. Garg! Could you please look into the following links? Borreria articularis (L. f.) F. N. Williams Spermacoce hispida L.

[efloraofindia:324205] Re: Herb ID from Bangladesh_SM_4003

Thanks a lot, Lalithamba ji. On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 14:39, Lalithamba Avadhanam wrote: > yes it is Spermacoce hispida > A.Lalithamba > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 12:49 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> It should be *Spermacoce hispida* L. >>

Re: [efloraofindia:324197] Thunbergia grandiflora ?

Thunbergia laurifolia. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 3:06 pm, Marc Blanc wrote: > Hello, > > Hassan, 1000m, Karnataka, january 2019. > It seems T.grandiflora. Perhaps cultivar. > Can you confirm ? > Thank you. > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are

[efloraofindia:324188] Re: SK47JUL23-2016:ID

Sorry. Correct wording should be Closest I can reach is *Spermacoce hispida* L. as per comparative images at *Spermacoce*

[efloraofindia:324185] Fwd: Plant from Chhattisgarh 2

Although not clearly visible, corolla tube should be long. It should be *Spermacoce articularis* as per comparative images at *Spermacoce*