[efloraofindia:344083] Re: SK2019 02 July 2019

Leaves are trifoliate in Desmodium laxiflorum subsp. laxiflorum On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 21:18, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Any further opinion? > Desmodium laxiflorum ? > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju

[efloraofindia:344081] Re: SK 2265 01 November 2019

I found in listing but not in image list. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 12:19 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > This has not yet appeared in the site. > Thank you Mr. Garg ! > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 6:22 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> Thank you Mr. Garg. >>

Re: [efloraofindia:344079] Impatiens scapiflora variations in Chikkmagaluru Karnataka-GS21022020-2

Thanks, Singh ji. These variations were already confirmed by Dr. Bhaskar, who has written Monograph on South Indian Balsams at Impatiens scapiflora and three variants GSOCT05/19 On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 12:58, Gurcharan Singh

[efloraofindia:344080] Re: SK 2265 01 November 2019

This has not yet appeared in the site. Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 6:22 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you Mr. Garg. > > Saroj Kasaju > > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 at 5:45 pm, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> I think matches as per >> GBIF

[efloraofindia:344075] Re: SK 2456 14 February 2020 - Mycophyta

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 5:47 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Pl. check comparative images at Order Agaricales > > and > Order Russulales >

[efloraofindia:344073] Re: SK 2475 21 February 2020 - Mycophyta

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 5:59 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Pl. check comparative images at Order Agaricales > > > > -- Forwarded message - >

[efloraofindia:344074] Re: SK 2474 21 February 2020 - Mycophyta

Thank you Mr. Garg! Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 5:58 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Pl. check comparative images at Order Agaricales > > and > Order Russulales >

[efloraofindia:344072] Re: SK 2476 21 February 2020 - Mycophyta

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 6:00 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Pl. check comparative images at Order Agaricales > > and > Order Russulales >

Re: [efloraofindia:344071] Re: Submission of Spergula marina (L.) Besser

Nice presentation ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 9:19 AM Mahadeswara wrote: > Superb ! > > On Friday, February 21, 2020 at 12:37:08 AM UTC+5:30, Yogesh Sharma wrote: >> >> Respected all, >> >> This one is *Spergula marina *(L.) Besser, very similar to *Spergula >> arvensis*

Re: [efloraofindia:344070] Spiny bush for ID Tiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu NAW-OCT-23

Thank you, Gargji. On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 at 10:55, J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it should be *Barleria mysorensis B.Heyne ex Roth* > > rather than *Barleria buxifolia L.* >

Fwd: [efloraofindia:344064] Wild Flower for ID-13-07-2010-RK

I think it should be *Barleria mysorensis B.Heyne ex Roth* rather than *Barleria buxifolia L.*

Re: [efloraofindia:344063] Fwd: [itpmods:13627] Could we think of restoring interactions on efloraofindia?

Rightly said Mr. Garg, Bhagbat Gita says : कर्मण्येवाधिकारस्ते मा फलेषु कदाचन । मा कर्मफलहेतुर्भुर्मा ते संगोऽस्त्वकर्मणि ! Still human nature expects some acknowledgements and interactions Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 at 9:08 am, J.M. Garg wrote: > > > -- Forwarded

[efloraofindia:344063] Re: Submission of Spergula marina (L.) Besser

Superb ! On Friday, February 21, 2020 at 12:37:08 AM UTC+5:30, Yogesh Sharma wrote: > > Respected all, > > This one is *Spergula marina *(L.) Besser, very similar to *Spergula > arvensis* L. but differing from it mainly in flower colour and glandular > hairs on sepals and pedicels. > >

[efloraofindia:344061] Fwd: [itpmods:13627] Could we think of restoring interactions on efloraofindia?

-- Forwarded message - From: J.M. Garg Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 at 08:52 Subject: Re: [itpmods:13627] Could we think of restoring interactions on efloraofindia? To: itpmods Thanks, Singh ji and others for your valuable inputs. I think need of the hour is to change ourselves. I

[efloraofindia:344059] Fwd: [itpmods:13622] Could we think of restoring interactions on efloraofindia?

-- Forwarded message - From: Nidhan Singh Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 19:58 Subject: Re: [itpmods:13622] Could we think of restoring interactions on efloraofindia? To: itpmods Dear Gurcharan Sir, I agree with your views, that the interactions on this forum have drastically

[efloraofindia:344055] Fwd: [itpmods:13621] Could we think of restoring interactions on efloraofindia?

-- Forwarded message - From: Dinesh Valke Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 18:59 Subject: Re: [itpmods:13621] Could we think of restoring interactions on efloraofindia? To: itpmods Yes Gurcharan ji ... somewhere along the journey, the tinkle and charm of interacting has got lost ... I

[efloraofindia:344055] Fwd: [itpmods:13619] Could we think of restoring interactions on efloraofindia?

-- Forwarded message - From: Tapas Chakrabarty Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 18:07 Subject: Re: [itpmods:13619] Could we think of restoring interactions on efloraofindia? To: When you find that you are sharing some literature or interesting image in the group but not getting reply

[efloraofindia:344055] Fwd: [itpmods:13627] Could we think of restoring interactions on efloraofindia?

-- Forwarded message - From: Dr. Anil Kumar Thakur Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 20:49 Subject: Re: [itpmods:13627] Could we think of restoring interactions on efloraofindia? To: itpmods Sir, I was busy with my other assignments. I'll surely start interacting again after 2-3

[efloraofindia:344057] Fwd: [itpmods:13620] Could we think of restoring interactions on efloraofindia?

-- Forwarded message - From: Saroj Kasaju Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 18:39 Subject: Re: [itpmods:13620] Could we think of restoring interactions on efloraofindia? To: Very true! Membership increasing without result. Thank you Gurucharn Sir/ Tapas da! Saroj Kasaju On Fri, 28

[efloraofindia:344055] Fwd: [itpmods:13618] Could we think of restoring interactions on efloraofindia?

-- Forwarded message - From: Gurcharan Singh Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 17:19 Subject: [itpmods:13618] Could we think of restoring interactions on efloraofindia? To: itpmods I must salute Garg ji and few other members doing the great job updating our website and correcting

[efloraofindia:344054] Re: plant is from Paderu

Colebrookea oppositifolia, Lamiaceae member ma'am,- from Paradesi ji. On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 at 08:08, J.M. Garg wrote: > *Colebrookea oppositifolia *Sm. > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > Any chance of Colebrookia oppositifolia? > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > > yes it is thank you for the great help >

Re: [efloraofindia:344052] Ranunculus flamula??

Thanks a lot, Singh ji. On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 21:04, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Ranunculus pulchellus I hope if flowers are 1.5 cm across, basal leaves > less than 5 cm long, cauline mostly 3-lobed; or if flowers 3 cm across, > basal leaves 7-10 cm long disappearing before flowering, cauline up

Re: [efloraofindia:344050] Justicia SN7220

Santhan sir, once check with Blepharis too, there is possible, With regards. On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 13:36, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Santhan ji > > On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 13:28, Ponnutheerthagiri Santhan < > ponsant...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Please keep under incuva Garg ji, From Kerala 3 new

Re: [efloraofindia:344049]

Colebrookea oppositifolia, Lamiaceae member ma'am, With regards. On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 20:16, Lalithamba Avadhanam wrote: > This plant is from Paderu of Vijayanagaram dist A.P. is it Boehemeria or > some other genus? because the leaf does not match with Boehemeria; leaves > both alternate and

Re: [efloraofindia:344048] Ranunculus flamula??

Ranunculus pulchellus I hope if flowers are 1.5 cm across, basal leaves less than 5 cm long, cauline mostly 3-lobed; or if flowers 3 cm across, basal leaves 7-10 cm long disappearing before flowering, cauline up to 30 cm long, mostly entire then R. lingua. Dr. Gurcharan Singh Retired

[efloraofindia:344047] Re: [itpmods:13625]

yes it is thank you for the great help A.Lalithamba On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 8:20 PM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Any chance of Colebrookia oppositifolia? > > > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas

[efloraofindia:344045] Re: [itpmods:13623]

Any chance of Colebrookia oppositifolia? Dr. Gurcharan Singh Retired Associate Professor SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. Mob: 9810359089 https://sing96.wixsite.com/mysite-1 On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 8:16 PM Lalithamba

[efloraofindia:344045] Re: [itpmods:13623]

*Colebrookea oppositifolia *Sm. Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 8:31 pm, Lalithamba Avadhanam wrote: > This plant is from Paderu of Vijayanagaram dist A.P. is it Boehemeria or > some other genus? because the leaf does not match with Boehemeria; leaves > both alternate and

Re: [efloraofindia:344034] Herb for id from Akbara, Agra

Thanks, Balakrishnan ji. On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 12:17, Nambiyath Balakrishnan wrote: > This appears to be *Euphorbia dracunculoides* Lam. (*E.angustifolia* > Buch.-Ham., non (Haw.) Steud.1812). > It is common in North and Central India. > Balakrishnan > 28/2/2020 > > > On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at

[efloraofindia:344033] Fwd: ID of Mistletoe plant on Acacia modesta..Pakistan (January 2020)

Thanks, Nagar ji. -- Forwarded message - From: Dr.Padamnabhi Nagar Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 15:00 Subject: Re: ID of Mistletoe plant on Acacia modesta..Pakistan (January 2020) To: J.M. Garg Dear Dr., He has properly identified it mistletoe plant. *Dr. Padamnabhi S. Nagar*

Re: [efloraofindia:344031] Symphyotrichum pilosum from Yamunanagar for Validation-GS21022020-1

Yes, it looks different and is not Symphiotrichum pilosum On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 14:20, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Here it is Garg ji > > > > > > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New

Re: [efloraofindia:344028] Sorting our I. edgeworthii/scabrida/tricornis populations: I. scabrida from Tiger Fall Area Chakrata

I must mention that all images were taken between 11.37 and 11.38 am. Dr. Gurcharan Singh Retired Associate Professor SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. Mob: 9810359089 https://sing96.wixsite.com/mysite-1 On Fri, Feb 28,

Re: [efloraofindia:344027] Sorting our I. edgeworthii/scabrida/tricornis populations: I. scabrida from Tiger Fall Area Chakrata

Thanks Garg ji, If second image 532 is accepted as I. scabrida, all others from the same population should also be so. Shinobu Akiyama and Hideaki Ohba in their 2016 where they suggested the shift of several specimens to I. tricornis, mentioned characters of I. scabrida as"Lower sepal

[efloraofindia:344025] Fwd: Your Symplocos macrophylla subsp. rosea images

Thanks, Sid ji. -- Forwarded message - From: Siddarth Machado Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 10:27 Subject: Re: Your Symplocos macrophylla subsp. rosea images To: J.M. Garg Hello Mr. Garg, Please find attached, images of Symplocos rosea observed in mid elevation evergreen forests

Re: [efloraofindia:344023] Justicia SN7220

Thanks, Santhan ji On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 13:28, Ponnutheerthagiri Santhan < ponsant...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please keep under incuva Garg ji, From Kerala 3 new species are published. > We need to check that also. > The area is very shady so the number of flowers less. > > On Fri, 21 Feb 2020,