Re: [efloraofindia:352000] Re: MS/ID/2020/June/1 - ID of the tree (Ficus sps.)

Streblus asper Regards Radha -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web,

[efloraofindia:352000] Re: Veronica persica for Validation : Srinagar, Kashmir : 08JUN20 : AK-11

Garg Ji, Thanks for validating. Regards, Aarti On Monday, June 8, 2020 at 10:15:36 AM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > > Yes, appears to be *Veronica persica* Poir. > > as > per comparative images

[efloraofindia:351997] Re: Bacopa rotundifolia in FOI

Indeed, it does look different from images of Bacopa rotundifolia on the web. Still can't be sure it is not Bacopa rotundifolia. Tabish --- www.flowersofindia.net The waterhole of flower lovers On Fri, May 29, 2020 at

[efloraofindia:351995] Re: Veronica persica for Validation : Srinagar, Kashmir : 08JUN20 : AK-11

Yes, appears to be *Veronica persica* Poir. as per comparative images at Veronica ‎ On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at

Re: [efloraofindia:351994] Grass id

Thank you Manoj ji and Garg ji. I also felt the same but wanted experts opinion. Warm regards B. Subramaniam On Mon, 8 Jun 2020, 10:07 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks alot, Manoj ji. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Manoj Chandran > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 09:39 > Subject: Re:

Fwd: [efloraofindia:351993] Grass id

Thanks alot, Manoj ji. -- Forwarded message - From: Manoj Chandran Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 09:39 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:351972] Grass id To: J.M. Garg Yes. Cynodon dactylon On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 7:03 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Bala ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M.

Fwd: [efloraofindia:351988] SCROPHULARIACEAE Fortnight: Veronica agrestis from Uttarakhand_DSR_18

I think it should be *Veronica polita* Fr. as per images and details herein. -- Forwarded message - From: J.M. Garg Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 at 21:43 Subject: Fwd:

Re: [efloraofindia:351985] Re: Veronica Species : Doodhpathri, Kashmir- 07JUN20 : AK-10

Thanks Garg Ji. Another similar one was seen near Gulmarg, but couldn't go closer. So the picture is not clear. Regards, Aarti On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 9:07 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > May be *Veronica serpyllifolia* subsp. *humifusa* (Dicks.) Syme >

Fwd: [efloraofindia:351985] Herbaceous plant of Alpine region for ID

Forwarding again for Id assistance please, for this Veronica species. Does not match with comparative images in efi site at Veronica ‎ Hi, Bhatt ji, Has it been identified since then ? -- Forwarded

[efloraofindia:351982] Re: Fwd: SK1878 30 April 2019 - Mycophyta

Russula On 7 Jun 2020 22:27, "Saroj Kasaju" wrote: > Re-surfacing for ID ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > Forwarded Conversation > Subject: SK1878 30 April 2019 - Mycophyta > > > From: Saroj Kasaju > Date: Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 8:49 PM > To: efloraindia , J.M. Garg <

[efloraofindia:351982] Re: Fwd: SK1869 26 April 2019 - Mycophyta

Maybeee Tubaria spp., Where is the underside? On 7 Jun 2020 22:25, "Saroj Kasaju" wrote: > Re-surfacing for ID ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > Forwarded Conversation > Subject: SK1869 26 April 2019 - Mycophyta > > > From: Saroj Kasaju > Date: Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at

[efloraofindia:351981] Re: Fwd: SK1870 27 April 2019 - Mycophyta

Suillus maybe, underside would be helpful On 7 Jun 2020 22:24, "Saroj Kasaju" wrote: > Re-surfacing for ID ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > Forwarded Conversation > Subject: SK1870 27 April 2019 - Mycophyta > > > From: Saroj Kasaju > Date: Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 9:48

Re: [efloraofindia:351979] Fwd: MS/ID/2020/June/1 - ID of the tree (Ficus sps.)

Streblus asper only, Not ficus sp. With kind regards. On Sun, Jun 7, 2020, 21:33 M Swamy wrote: > > -- Forwarded message - > From: M Swamy > Date: Sun, 7 Jun, 2020, 21:05 > Subject: MS/ID/2020/June/1 - ID of the tree (Ficus sps.) > To: efloraofindia > > > Please ID the tree

Re: [efloraofindia:351978] Grass id

You are welcome, Garg ji. Warm regards B. Subramaniam On Mon, 8 Jun 2020, 07:03 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks, Bala ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Bala Subramaniam > Date: Mon 8 Jun, 2020, 6:49 AM > Subject: [efloraofindia:351972] Grass

Fwd: [efloraofindia:351974] Plant for ID_AS_30April2017

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: abhay soman Date: Sun 7 Jun, 2020, 10:20 PM Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:271300] Plant for ID_AS_30April2017 To: J.M. Garg Dear Garg ji, Thank you so much for your mail. Best, Abhay. On Sun, 7 Jun, 2020, 21:55 J.M.

Re: [efloraofindia:351974] Re: SK132OCT06-2016:ID

Thanks, Saroj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sun 7 Jun, 2020, 10:16 PM Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > Yes Mr. Garg ! I guess it matches exactly ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 9:45 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> I think this should be *Veronica undulata* Wall. Matches as per

Re: [efloraofindia:351967] Re: Veronica Species : Doodhpathri, Kashmir- 07JUN20 : AK-10

Hi, Aarti ji, Pl. send the high resolution image to check the details. On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at 20:31, Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Ok. > I will check. > Regards, > Aarti > > On Sunday, June 7, 2020 at 7:42:37 PM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: >> >> No, it is different. Pl. check comparative images at genus

Re: [efloraofindia:351965] Re: SK132OCT06-2016:ID

Yes Mr. Garg ! I guess it matches exactly ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 9:45 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think this should be *Veronica undulata* Wall. Matches as per details > in Scrophulariaceae of the Western Himalayas >

Re: [efloraofindia:351966] Plant for ID_AS_30April2017

Yes Mr. Garg ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 10:10 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think this should be *Veronica undulata* Wall. Matches as per details > in Scrophulariaceae of the Western Himalayas >

Fwd: [efloraofindia:351963] SCROPHULARIACEAE Fortnight: Veronica anagalis-aquatica from Uttarakhand_DSR_19

I think this should be *Veronica undulata* Wall. Matches as per details in Scrophulariaceae of the Western Himalayas

[efloraofindia:351958] Re: SK132OCT06-2016:ID

I think this should be *Veronica undulata* Wall. Matches as per details in Scrophulariaceae of the Western Himalayas

Re: [efloraofindia:351958] Fwd: Veronica anagallis-aquatica from Delhi

I think this should be *Veronica undulata* Wall. Matches as per details in Scrophulariaceae of the Western Himalayas

[efloraofindia:351957] Re: SK132OCT06-2016:ID

One possibility is *Veronica undulata* Wall. as per Checklist of Nepal , but again the emarginate capsule is contradictory. On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at 20:05, J.M. Garg wrote: > Check if any of the names in checklist of Nepal, is syn.

[efloraofindia:351957] Re: Acanthaceae for ID : Friends of the Trees Exhibition, Mumbai : 05JUN20 : AK-4

This plant was really a puzzle. Apparently, the label is wrong. Varun Ji was kind enough to help me. Clerodendrum quadriloculare variety Brandonii from Lamiaceae. Absolutely brilliant Varun Ji. Thanks a lot. Regards, Aarti On Friday, June 5, 2020 at 11:02:30 AM UTC+5:30, Aarti S. Khale wrote: > >

Re: [efloraofindia:351955] Re: Veronica Species : Doodhpathri, Kashmir- 07JUN20 : AK-10

Saroj Ji, Thanks for the id. Regards, Aarti On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 7:53 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Please check Veronica serpyllifolia subsp. humifusa (Dicks.) Syme ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 7:57 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> No, it is different. Pl. check

[efloraofindia:351955] Re: Veronica Species : Doodhpathri, Kashmir- 07JUN20 : AK-10

Ok. I will check. Regards, Aarti On Sunday, June 7, 2020 at 7:42:37 PM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > > No, it is different. Pl. check comparative images at genus page in efi > site. > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Sun 7 Jun, 2020, 7:33 PM Aarti S. Khale, > wrote: > >> Garg Ji, >> These

[efloraofindia:351954] Re: Penstemon digitalis 'Dark Towers' : Somerset Park, New Jersey : 07JUN20 : AK-9

Garg Ji, Thanks for the appreciation. Regards, Aarti On Sunday, June 7, 2020 at 7:40:28 PM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > > Thanks, Aarti Ji, for the wonderful images. > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Sun 7 Jun, 2020, 7:17 PM Aarti S. Khale, > wrote: > >> Garg Ji, >> You are reviewing

Re: [efloraofindia:351953] Justicia Species for ID : Friends of the Trees Exhibition, Mumbai : 07JUN20 : AK-8

Saroj Ji, Thanks for validating. Regards, Aarti On Sunday, June 7, 2020 at 7:30:42 PM UTC+5:30, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > > Justicia spicigera Schltdl ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 6:58 PM Aarti S. Khale > wrote: > >> Justicia Species seen at the Exhibition. >>

Re: [efloraofindia:351952] Datura Species for ID : Friends of the Trees Exhibition, Mumbai : 07JUN20 : AK-7

Thanks a lot Saroj Ji. A similar one earlier was also identified the same. Regards, Aarti On Sunday, June 7, 2020 at 7:33:03 PM UTC+5:30, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > > Please check Datura metel 'Blackcurrant Swirl' > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 6:47 PM Aarti S.

[efloraofindia:351950] Re: SK132OCT06-2016:ID

Check if any of the names in checklist of Nepal, is syn. of this name. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sun 7 Jun, 2020, 7:44 PM Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > Fruiting image looks matching but POWO, GBIF showing no distribution > in India whereas CoL showing distribution in J only ! > Thank you. > >

Re: [efloraofindia:351949] Re: Veronica Species : Doodhpathri, Kashmir- 07JUN20 : AK-10

Please check Veronica serpyllifolia subsp. humifusa (Dicks.) Syme ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 7:57 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > No, it is different. Pl. check comparative images at genus page in efi > site. > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Sun 7 Jun, 2020, 7:33 PM

[efloraofindia:351948] Re: SK132OCT06-2016:ID

Fruiting image looks matching but POWO, GBIF showing no distribution in India whereas CoL showing distribution in J only ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 6:18 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Emarginate fruits take me to *Veronica anagalloides* subsp. *anagalloides* >

[efloraofindia:351947] Re: Veronica Species : Doodhpathri, Kashmir- 07JUN20 : AK-10

No, it is different. Pl. check comparative images at genus page in efi site. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sun 7 Jun, 2020, 7:33 PM Aarti S. Khale, wrote: > Garg Ji, > These plants were seen at Doodhpathri in Kashmir during our visit > in April,2016. > Veronica anagallis-aquatica identified

[efloraofindia:351946] Re: Penstemon digitalis 'Dark Towers' : Somerset Park, New Jersey : 07JUN20 : AK-9

Thanks, Aarti Ji, for the wonderful images. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sun 7 Jun, 2020, 7:17 PM Aarti S. Khale, wrote: > Garg Ji, > You are reviewing Penstemon. > One addition from New Jersey during my visit in 2017. > Missed posting it earlier. > Aarti > -- You received this message

Re: [efloraofindia:351944] Datura Species for ID : Friends of the Trees Exhibition, Mumbai : 07JUN20 : AK-7

Please check Datura metel 'Blackcurrant Swirl' Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 6:47 PM Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Datura Species seen at the Friends of the Trees Exhibition in Feb, 20. > Aarti > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >

Re: [efloraofindia:351943] Justicia Species for ID : Friends of the Trees Exhibition, Mumbai : 07JUN20 : AK-8

Justicia spicigera Schltdl ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 6:58 PM Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Justicia Species seen at the Exhibition. > Justicia spicigera? > Aarti > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To

[efloraofindia:351930] Re: SK 2625 24 May 2020

Male plant will not produce fruit. On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at 12:57, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you Mr. Garg. > Does it produce fruits? > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 9:57 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> I think male plant of Piper peepuloides is possible as per GBIF specimen >>

Fwd: [efloraofindia:351930] ID request 20072017PC1

-- Forwarded message - From: Chitralekha P Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at 14:08 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:273042] ID request 20072017PC1 To: J.M. Garg Thank you Garg ji. With regards, Chitralekha On Saturday, 6 June 2020, 02:47:51 PM IST, J.M. Garg wrote: It is more likely to

[efloraofindia:351929] Re: SK 2625 24 May 2020

Thank you Mr. Garg. Does it produce fruits? Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 9:57 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think male plant of Piper peepuloides is possible as per GBIF specimen >

[efloraofindia:351928] Fwd: [itpmods:13932] Fwd: Posts leading to publication of new species

-- Forwarded message - From: Giby Kuriakose Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at 12:18 Subject: Re: [itpmods:13932] Fwd: Posts leading to publication of new species To: This is good news. Of course, this forum would facilitate in finding many more such interesting publications. Regards,

Re: [efloraofindia:351925] Re: Validation of Dianella

Thank you Swamy ji. Warm regards B. Subramaniam On Sun, 7 Jun 2020, 09:29 Mahadeswara, wrote: > The ID is correct. This is a common foliage pot plant grown in home > gardens here. In fact I have grown this in Chennai & here. > > On Saturday, June 6, 2020 at 10:28:54 PM UTC+5:30,

Re: [efloraofindia:351924] Fwd: Piper Var.

Since this is the latest paper, it settles the name confusion, and it also considers the paper I had pointed to. Prasanta Kumar Mukherjee would know the identity of this plant well, I am sure. So, I take it as *Piper peepuloides.* Tabish ---