[efloraofindia:367873] Re: SK176NOV04-2016:ID 2

Fwd: SK176NOV04-2016:ID Amaranthus hypochondriacus L. ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 6:44 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > ID still pending > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 6:20 PM

Re: [efloraofindia:367873] Chenopodiaceae and Amaranthaceae Week :: Amaranthus for ID : Muscat : AK-13

Amaranthus dubius Mart.?? Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Friday, February 15, 2013 at 6:34:35 PM UTC+5:45 JM Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > > Most likely Amaranthus blitum subsp. oleraceus > -- > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > >

[efloraofindia:367870] Re: MS, Dec.,2020/02 Herb for id.

It seems opposite leaves On Wed, 2 Dec, 2020, 8:40 pm M Sawmliana, wrote: > Location : Sairep > Date : 07-06-2016 > Habit : Herb > Habitat : Wild > > With regards, > M.Sawmliana > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To

Re: [efloraofindia:367869] Nilgiris: Rubiaceae for identification 301112MK03

I hope other aspects are Ok? -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sat, 5 Dec, 2020, 1:02 am Muthu Karthick, wrote: > Hi Garg ji, > > Apologies for my delayed response. I think *H.indirae* has pubescent > leaves and mine are glabrous. > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 5:00 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Yes,

Re: [efloraofindia:367868] Hibiscus sp, Malvaceae

H. rosa sinensis. Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 at 10:16 am, Milind Girdhari wrote: > Sending pictures of a Hibiscus sp > Clicked in Aurangabad MH > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this

Re: [efloraofindia:367865] Cyperus Species for ID : Nasik : 03DEC20 : AK-05

Paradesi Ji, Thanks a lot. Regards, Aarti On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:58 PM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Resembles Cyperus iria, > With regards. > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 14:47, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Same in this case also - clear close-ups ! >> Thank you. >>

Re: [efloraofindia:367864] Small Plant for ID : Nasik : 03DEC20 : AK-04

Thanks Paradesi Ji. Regards, Aarti On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:18 PM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > I too agree with Saroj ji, > With regards. > > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 15:36, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Sure Aarti Ji ! >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Fri,

Re: [efloraofindia:367863] Re: Small Plant for ID : Nasik : 03DEC20 : AK-06

Thanks a lot Paradesi Ji. Tes, looks like your suggested id. Regards, Aarti On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 9:50 PM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Check with Elaeocharis geniculata ma'am., > With regards. > > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 19:25, Aarti S. Khale wrote: > >> This

Re: [efloraofindia:367862] Garden Shrub for ID : New York : 07AUG19 : AK-19

Thanks Saroj Ji. Regards, Aarti On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 1:21 PM Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > I guess ID is not yet resolved . Best match I guess is Viburnum dilatatum ! > Viburnum >

Re: [efloraofindia:367861] Nilgiris: Rubiaceae for identification 301112MK03

Hi Garg ji, Apologies for my delayed response. I think *H.indirae* has pubescent leaves and mine are glabrous. On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 5:00 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, looks different from *Hedyotis beddomei *Hook.f. as per > >

Re: [efloraofindia:367860] Fwd: Tree identification

Thank you Paradesi ji. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 11:27 pm, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you Saroj ji, it might be, > With regards. > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 13:55, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> This has already been listed as Khaya senegalensis (Desv.)

Re: [efloraofindia:367859] Fwd: Tree identification

Thank you Saroj ji, it might be, With regards. On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 13:55, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > This has already been listed as Khaya senegalensis (Desv.) A.Juss. > and I guess ID is correct ! > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 12:35 AM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < >

Re: [efloraofindia:367858] MS, Dec.,2020/02 Herb for id.

If the leaves opposite could be a Boraginaceae member, With regards. On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 23:04, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, Saroj Ji, I was missed to keep Gentianaceae in an earlier comment, > With regards. > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 14:08, Saroj Kasaju

Re: [efloraofindia:367857] MS, Dec.,2020/02 Herb for id.

Sorry, Saroj Ji, I was missed to keep Gentianaceae in an earlier comment, With regards. On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 14:08, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Gesneriaceae ?? > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 12:29 AM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < > paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Check

Re: [efloraofindia:367856] Cyperus Species for ID : Nasik : 03DEC20 : AK-05

Resembles Cyperus iria, With regards. On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 14:47, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Same in this case also - clear close-ups ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:50 PM Aarti S. Khale > wrote: > >> Seen on the Gangapur Grasslands, close to the water body. >>

Re: [efloraofindia:367855] Plants for ID...

Ok Paradesi ji. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 10:55 pm, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry for the species, JI, > With regards. > > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 22:38, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Which one Paradesi Ji ? >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju

Re: [efloraofindia:367853] Re: [indiantreepix:25168] Alternanthera sessilis ?? 091109 – NSD 93

Thank you Paradesi ji Saroj Kasaju On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 11:01 pm, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you, Saroj Ji, > It's not tenella or sessilis, could be ficoidea only. > With regards. > > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 22:37, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Alternanthera

Re: [efloraofindia:367853] Re: [indiantreepix:25168] Alternanthera sessilis ?? 091109 – NSD 93

Thank you, Saroj Ji, It's not tenella or sessilis, could be ficoidea only. With regards. On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 22:37, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Alternanthera sessilis ?? 091109 – NSD 93 - efloraofindia | Google Groups >

Re: [efloraofindia:367851] Plants for ID...

Sorry for the species, JI, With regards. On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 22:38, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Which one Paradesi Ji ? > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:13 PM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < > paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I too agree with Saroj Ji, for Argostemma,

Re: [efloraofindia:367851] MS, Dec.,2020/12 Climber for id

 Thank you, sir, With kind regards. On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 22:34, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > You are a gem Paradesi Ji ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:31 PM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < > paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Pandorea jasminoides, >> With regards. >> >>

Re: [efloraofindia:367848] Plants for ID...

Which one Paradesi Ji ? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:13 PM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > I too agree with Saroj Ji, for Argostemma, > With regards. > > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 16:14, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Argostemma tavoyanum Wall. ex

Re: [efloraofindia:367849] Re: [indiantreepix:25168] Alternanthera sessilis ?? 091109 – NSD 93

Alternanthera sessilis ?? 091109 – NSD 93 - efloraofindia | Google Groups Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:14 PM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Photos > >

Re: [efloraofindia:367848] MS, Dec., 2020/09 plant for id

Apocynaceae member, Ceropegia sp., With regards. On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:52, M Sawmliana wrote: > Location : Dampui forest > Date : 03-09-2016 > Habit : Undershrub ? > Habitat : Wild > > With regards, > M.Sawmliana > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [efloraofindia:367846] MS Dec.,2020/10 Desmodium ? for Id

Thank you Paradesi Ji ! Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:24 PM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, it's Saroj Ji, > With regards. > > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 15:51, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Codariocalyx gyroides (Roxb. ex Link) Hassk. ! >> Thank you. >> >>

Re: [efloraofindia:367846] MS, Dec.,2020/12 Climber for id

You are a gem Paradesi Ji ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:31 PM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Pandorea jasminoides, > With regards. > > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 15:42, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Cultivated ? Allamanda sp. ?? >> Thank you. >> >>

Re: [efloraofindia:367845] Small Plant for ID : Nasik : 03DEC20 : AK-04

Thank you Paradesi Ji ! Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:33 PM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > I too agree with Saroj ji, > With regards. > > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 15:36, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Sure Aarti Ji ! >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On

Re: [efloraofindia:367844] Plants for ID...

Sorry Mahadevan Sir, it's not, there clear dense hairs, very close to peruviana, With regards. On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 15:12, Mahadevan R wrote: > i think this plants name is > Physalis minima > > *R. Mahadevan M.Sc., M.Phil., B.Ed., Ph.D * > >

Re: [efloraofindia:367843] Small Plant for ID : Nasik : 03DEC20 : AK-04

I too agree with Saroj ji, With regards. On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 15:36, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Sure Aarti Ji ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:37 PM Aarti S. Khale > wrote: > >> Saroj Ji, >> Thanks for the suggested id. >> Hope to get it validated. >> Regards, >>

Re: [efloraofindia:367842] MS, Dec.,2020/12 Climber for id

Pandorea jasminoides, With regards. On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 15:42, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Cultivated ? Allamanda sp. ?? > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:22 PM M Sawmliana wrote: > >> Location : Sakawrtuichhun >> Altitude : 800 m >> Habit : Climber >> Habitat :

Re: [efloraofindia:367841] MS Dec.,2020/10 Desmodium ? for Id

Yes, it's Saroj Ji, With regards. On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 15:51, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Codariocalyx gyroides (Roxb. ex Link) Hassk. ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:47 PM M Sawmliana wrote: > >> Location : Aizawl, Mizoram >> Habit : Small shrub >> Habitat :Wild >>

Re: [efloraofindia:367839] Re: [indiantreepix:25168] Alternanthera sessilis ?? 091109 – NSD 93

Photos On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 21:57, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > This is still in doubtful list though IDed . > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > On Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 6:09:09 PM UTC+5:45 Gurcharan Singh > wrote: > >> It is Alternanthera ficoidea (A. tenella being its synonym) >> >>

Re: [efloraofindia:367839] Plants for ID...

I too agree with Saroj Ji, for Argostemma, With regards. On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 16:14, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Argostemma tavoyanum Wall. ex Benn. ?? > Has Argostemma sarmentosum Wall. got distribution there ? > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:46 PM Apurba Das wrote:

[efloraofindia:367839] Re: [indiantreepix:25168] Alternanthera sessilis ?? 091109 – NSD 93

This is still in doubtful list though IDed . Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 6:09:09 PM UTC+5:45 Gurcharan Singh wrote: > It is Alternanthera ficoidea (A. tenella being its synonym) > > -- > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of

[efloraofindia:367838] Re: [indiantreepix:24318] Alternanthera ficoides

It is still in doubtful list though IDed! Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Sunday, November 29, 2009 at 7:29:06 PM UTC+5:45 Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Yes Satish ji > You are right > > > -- > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932

[efloraofindia:367837] Re: SK1080 11 APR-2018

I guess hairy nature of stem, inflorescence and leaves different from Alternanthera bettzickiana. Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Sunday, April 22, 2018 at 9:59:45 PM UTC+5:45 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > Thank you Mr. Garg . > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 12:10 PM, J.M.

Re: [efloraofindia:367835] Re: Small Plant for ID : Nasik : 03DEC20 : AK-06

Check with Elaeocharis geniculata ma'am., With regards. On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 19:25, Aarti S. Khale wrote: > This seems to be a Rush, from the Juncaceae family. > Plants were very small, almost the size of my palm. > There were no visible leaves and the morning dew drops on the plant made > it

Re: [efloraofindia:367835] Ornamental for id from Darjeeling:: NS Sept 09

Bomarea multiflora (L.f.) Mirb. ?? Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 at 8:03:53 AM UTC+5:45 surajitno...@gmail.com wrote: > Perhaps we can identify it upto *B. caldasiana* Herb. level, thereafter > it diverges - 1) http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/kew-300671 2)

Re: [efloraofindia:367833] Small Tree for ID : New Jersey,US : 15NOV17 : AK-09

Sure Aarti Ji ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 7:23 PM Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Ok Saroj Ji. > Hope to get the id resolved. > Regards, > Aarti > > On Friday, December 4, 2020 at 4:45:05 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju > wrote: > >> May be a different sp. >> No match with

Re: [efloraofindia:367832] Small Tree for ID : New Jersey,US : 15NOV17 : AK-09

Ok Saroj Ji. Hope to get the id resolved. Regards, Aarti On Friday, December 4, 2020 at 4:45:05 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > May be a different sp. > No match with Viburnum >

Re: [efloraofindia:367831] Succulent For ID : BBC Show,Mumbai : 150513 : AK-3

Thank you Saroj Ji. Regards, Aarti On Friday, December 4, 2020 at 5:35:17 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > I guess Delosperma congestum! > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > On Monday, January 5, 2015 at 1:06:54 PM UTC+5:45 Aarti S. Khale wrote: > >> Garg Ji, >> On searching, this could be

[efloraofindia:367830] Re: Bush For ID : Kenya : 14OCT16 : AK-18

Thanks Saroj Ji. Regards, Aarti On Friday, December 4, 2020 at 5:29:15 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > Surprisingly there is no distribution of Viburnum species in Kenya. > Only option is introduced and not yet recorded. > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > On Thursday, December 15, 2016 at

Re: [efloraofindia:367828] Ornamental Bush For ID : Lalbagh,Bangalore : 011213 : AK-2

This is probably Rhaphiolepis indica, identified from another post from the same place Lalbagh, Bangalore. Regards, Aarti On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 6:48 PM Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Thanks Saroj Ji. > Regards, > Aarti > > On Friday, December 4, 2020 at 5:18:06 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju >

Re: [efloraofindia:367827] Re: SK1052 30MAR-2018

Ha Ha ! You had suggested to compare with it earlier ! I do not see other option ! Any opinion? Thank you Anil ji. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 6:41 pm, Dr. Anil Kumar Thakur < anilthakur2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looking different from Viburnum mullaha. >

Re: [efloraofindia:367827] Ornamental Bush For ID : Lalbagh,Bangalore : 011213 : AK-2

Thanks Saroj Ji. Regards, Aarti On Friday, December 4, 2020 at 5:18:06 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > Not Viburnum sp. > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > On Saturday, December 14, 2013 at 9:28:58 PM UTC+5:45 Aarti S. Khale wrote: > >> Dear friends, >> Could this be Viburnum species? >>

Re: [efloraofindia:367825] Re: SK1052 30MAR-2018

Looking different from Viburnum mullaha. http://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Starry%20Viburnum.html On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, 6:12 pm Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > SK1052 30MAR-2018 > > > Thank you Anil Ji ! > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri,

Re: [efloraofindia:367824] Re: SK1052 30MAR-2018

SK1052 30MAR-2018 Thank you Anil Ji ! Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dr. Anil Kumar Thakur < anilthakur2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Which one, Sir > > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, 3:36 pm Saroj Kumar Kasaju, > wrote: > >> I guess

Re: [efloraofindia:367823] Re: SK1052 30MAR-2018

Which one, Sir On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, 3:36 pm Saroj Kumar Kasaju, wrote: > I guess Viburnum mullaha may be the correct ID. > Thank you. > Saroj Kasaju > On Wednesday, May 2, 2018 at 12:08:57 AM UTC+5:45 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > >> https://www.mijntuin.org/plants/22924-viburnum-mullaha >> >>

[efloraofindia:367823] Re: SK1113 27 APR-2018

Lampranthus spectabilis ‘Tresco Red’ Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 8:15:47 PM UTC+5:45 Viplav Gangar wrote: > > I really don't know what species this one could be. It is a complex genus. > > Best wishes, Viplav > > El 1 de mayo de 2018, 17:00, J.M. Garg escribió: > >> >>

Re: [efloraofindia:367822] Succulent For ID : BBC Show,Mumbai : 150513 : AK-3

I guess Delosperma congestum! Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Monday, January 5, 2015 at 1:06:54 PM UTC+5:45 Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Garg Ji, > On searching, this could be Delosperma congestum 'Gold Nugget' of > Aizoaceae. > Requesting our experts to kindly validate. > Regards, > Aarti > > On Mon,

[efloraofindia:367821] Re: Bush For ID : Kenya : 14OCT16 : AK-18

Surprisingly there is no distribution of Viburnum species in Kenya. Only option is introduced and not yet recorded. Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 12:15:30 PM UTC+5:45 Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Resurfacing for id assistance. > Aarti > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:26 AM,

Re: [efloraofindia:367820] Ornamental Bush For ID : Lalbagh,Bangalore : 011213 : AK-2

Not Viburnum sp. Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Saturday, December 14, 2013 at 9:28:58 PM UTC+5:45 Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Dear friends, > Could this be Viburnum species? > Regards, > Aarti > > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Aarti S. Khale > wrote: > >> Pudji ji, >> Thanks for a possible id.

[efloraofindia:367819] Re: SK721 24 AUG-2017:ID

Viburnam mullaha ! Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Monday, September 18, 2017 at 12:29:46 AM UTC+5:45 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > Sorry, no match ! > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:49 PM, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Navendu ji. >> >> On 12-Sep-2017 9:44 AM, "navendu

[efloraofindia:367818] Re: Plant for id.

Looks other than suggested 3 sp. Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Tuesday, May 8, 2018 at 11:14:36 AM UTC+5:45 JM Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for id pl > Viburnum, Daphne and Pittosporum has been suggested. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Dipankar Borah > Date: Sat 28 Apr, 2018,

Re: [efloraofindia:367817] Ornamental Viburnum species from Shimla

Viburnum × burkwoodii ?? Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 6:26:05 PM UTC+5:45 JM Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > Nice one > Could it be Viburnum tinus? > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > > Yesterday got a mail

Re: [efloraofindia:367816] Small Tree for ID : New Jersey,US : 15NOV17 : AK-09

May be a different sp. No match with Viburnum Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Wednesday, November 15, 2017 at

Re: [efloraofindia:367814] Strobilanthes scaber from South Andaman

Thanks, Dr. Wood. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Fri, 4 Dec, 2020, 4:35 pm John Wood, wrote: > This plant belongs to the yellow-flowered "Sericocalyx" group of > Strobilanthes, which consists of a small cluster of species including > Strobilanthes scabra, S. phyllostachya, S. flava, S.

Re: [efloraofindia:367812] Plants for ID...

Argostemma tavoyanum Wall. ex Benn. ?? Has Argostemma sarmentosum Wall. got distribution there ? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:46 PM Apurba Das wrote: > Dear All > > One small herb collected from Narcondam Island at an elevation of 400 m. > > Requested to please provide

Re: [efloraofindia:367811] MS Dec.,2020/10 Desmodium ? for Id

Codariocalyx gyroides (Roxb. ex Link) Hassk. ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:47 PM M Sawmliana wrote: > Location : Aizawl, Mizoram > Habit : Small shrub > Habitat :Wild > > > With regards, > M.Sawmliana > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [efloraofindia:367810] MS Dec.,2020/11 Citrus sp. for id.

Citrus longilimon Yu.Tanaka ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:19 PM M Sawmliana wrote: > Location : Sakawrtuichhun > Date : 04-12-2020 > Habit : Large shrub or small tree > Habitat : Cultivated > Note : Fruit edible > > With regards, > M.Sawmliana > > -- > You received this

Re: [efloraofindia:367809] MS, Dec.,2020/12 Climber for id

Cultivated ? Allamanda sp. ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:22 PM M Sawmliana wrote: > Location : Sakawrtuichhun > Altitude : 800 m > Habit : Climber > Habitat : Cultivated > > With regarded, > M.Sawmliana > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [efloraofindia:367808] Small Plant for ID : Nasik : 03DEC20 : AK-04

Sure Aarti Ji ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:37 PM Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Saroj Ji, > Thanks for the suggested id. > Hope to get it validated. > Regards, > Aarti > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:54 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Ammannia baccifera Roth ?? >> Thank you. >> >>

Re: [efloraofindia:367808] Re: SK1052 30MAR-2018

I guess Viburnum mullaha may be the correct ID. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Wednesday, May 2, 2018 at 12:08:57 AM UTC+5:45 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > https://www.mijntuin.org/plants/22924-viburnum-mullaha > > http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=110_id=242354165 > > Thank you. > >

Re: [efloraofindia:367806] Small Plant for ID : Nasik : 03DEC20 : AK-04

Saroj Ji, Thanks for the suggested id. Hope to get it validated. Regards, Aarti On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:54 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Ammannia baccifera Roth ?? > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:47 PM Aarti S. Khale > wrote: > >> Seen on the Gangapur Grasslands,

Re: [efloraofindia:367805] Plants for ID...

i think this plants name is Physalis minima *R. Mahadevan M.Sc., M.Phil., B.Ed., Ph.D * *Researcher and Manager,* *Chithmur organic developers (P) Ltd., * *Minnal Chithamur, * *Maduranthagam Taluk,* *Chengalpet Dist,603307* *Phone No:

Re: [efloraofindia:367800] shrub /small tree for ID

Viburnum erubescens Wall. ex DC. Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Friday, July 7, 2017 at 5:20:09 PM UTC+5:45 JM Garg wrote: > Pl. check with the following: > http://media.eol.org/content/2012/01/21/08/01872_orig.jpg > http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=119623_id=2 >

[efloraofindia:367799] Re: SK638 11 JUL-2017:ID

Viburnum erubescens Wall. ex DC. Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 5:00:54 PM UTC+5:45 JM Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > > Viburnum erubescens >