Fwd: [efloraofindia:369781] ANNOV37 Which Impatiens sp.?

I think it looks different from images at Impatiens devendrae I could not find a match. -- Forwarded message - From: Saroj Kumar Kasaju Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 at 20:18 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:369375] ANNOV37 Which

Re: [efloraofindia:369782] Boraginaceae Week: Ehretia laevis Pune

*Ehretia aspera *Willd. ?? Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Saturday, September 29, 2018 at 12:48:49 PM UTC+5:45 JM Garg wrote: > I find it different (particularly the leaves) from other images at Ehretia > laevis >

Re: [efloraofindia:369781] Boraginaceae Week :: Ehretia cymosa, Thonn. <=> Murembu Tree - bangalore - RA (confirm)

I guess ID is matching . FoI Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Saturday, June 23, 2012 at 1:06:20

Re: [efloraofindia:369778] Re: Request for id

Among the Striga species having distribution in Himanchal Pradesh it loks matching to *Striga angustifolia *(D.Don) Saldanha . Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 11:17 AM Bala Subramaniam < balasubramaniam1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Habit image of the plant > > On Wed, 30 Dec 2020,

Re: [efloraofindia:369777] For identification-6

Yes, it is Blumea viscosa On Thu, 24 Dec 2020 at 20:14, J.M. Garg wrote: > > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Thu, 24 Dec, 2020, 7:27 pm Lalithamba Avadhanam, > wrote: > >> It is Blumea only >> >> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 6:25

Re: [efloraofindia:369776] Herb Id from Bangladesh_SM_1502

Looks different from images at Baccharoides anthelmintica Maybe from *Gymnanthemum *like *Gymnanthemum extensum* (Wall. ex DC.) Steetz

Re: [efloraofindia:369775] Fwd: Asteraceae for id 040410MK1

I think more close to *Acilepis divergens* (Roxb.) H.Rob. & Skvarla rather than *Acilepis saligna* (DC.) H.Rob.

[efloraofindia:369772] Re: MS/ID/DEC/2020/2- ID of the plant

Forwarding again for ID. On Tuesday, December 29, 2020 at 9:43:28 AM UTC+5:30 Mahadeswara wrote: > I request the members to kindly help me to ID the herb. Photographs are > attached herewith. Commelinaceae. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [efloraofindia:369768] ID KZD 08

-- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 29 Dec, 2020, 10:32 pm Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > *Buchnera hispida *D.Don ! > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 10:40 PM Girish Kumar wrote: > >> Please identify this small herb from a laterite hillock in kozhikode >> district of

Re: [efloraofindia:369769] VOF Week: Boraginaceae sp.--FMN-6 en-route Joshimath

-- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 29 Dec, 2020, 10:17 pm Saroj Kumar Kasaju, wrote: > *Cynoglossum lanceolatum *Forssk. ?? > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > On Thursday, September 20, 2012 at 4:52:57 PM UTC+5:45 JM Garg wrote: > >> Forwarding again for Id assistance please. >> >> >> --

Re: [efloraofindia:369767] ID KZD 08

*Buchnera hispida *D.Don ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 10:40 PM Girish Kumar wrote: > Please identify this small herb from a laterite hillock in kozhikode > district of Kerala. 25/12/20 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >

[efloraofindia:369766] ID KZD 08

Please identify this small herb from a laterite hillock in kozhikode district of Kerala. 25/12/20 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [efloraofindia:369766] VOF Week: Boraginaceae sp.--FMN-6 en-route Joshimath

*Cynoglossum lanceolatum *Forssk. ?? Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Thursday, September 20, 2012 at 4:52:57 PM UTC+5:45 JM Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Prashant Awale > Date: 12 September 2012 20:50 > Subject:

Re: [efloraofindia:369764] For ID 190911 NS1

On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 at 21:27, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > *Cynoglossum lanceolatum* Forssk. ??? > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > On Sunday, December 18, 2011 at 9:45:52 PM UTC+5:45 Neha Singh wrote: > >> May b Cynoglossum lanceolatum ?? >> >> Regards >> Neha S >> > -- > You received this message

Re: [efloraofindia:369764] For ID 190911 NS1

*Cynoglossum lanceolatum* Forssk. ??? Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Sunday, December 18, 2011 at 9:45:52 PM UTC+5:45 Neha Singh wrote: > May b Cynoglossum lanceolatum ?? > > Regards > Neha S > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To

[efloraofindia:369762] Re: Setting of eflora group

Hi, Shobha ji, I searched on 'koa...@gmail.com' and could find all the posts where your mail id is there chronologically. On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 at 19:33, J.M. Garg wrote: > No, this is the page created by me in our new efloraofindia.com site. > You try to search on your mail id. > -- > With

Re: [efloraofindia:369762] Fwd: [India-nature-pixs] Paracaryopsis lambertiana

Adelocaryum coelestinum (Lindl.) Brand Syn : *Cynoglossum coelestinum * Lindl. Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Thursday, March 4, 2010 at 5:08:56 PM UTC+5:45 JM Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise pl. > > Earlier relevant feedback: > > “Dear Rajesh, > *do you have a long

Re: [efloraofindia:369760] Bignonia cupreolata or venusta?

-- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 29 Dec, 2020, 7:45 pm Saroj Kumar Kasaju, wrote: > *Campsis radicans *(L.) Seem. ?? BPoI >

Re: [efloraofindia:369759] FJ7 031113

-- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 29 Dec, 2020, 8:37 pm Saroj Kumar Kasaju, wrote: > Wikimedia >

Re: [efloraofindia:369753] MS, Dec., 2020/09 plant for id

Thanks, Prasad ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 29 Dec, 2020, 8:11 pm prasad kothareddy, wrote: > Hello sir > > Corona in the image is not visible and the tuber is present or not. > > Corona whether single or double. > > If it is double, then it is Brachystelma > > On Sat, Dec 26, 2020

Re: [efloraofindia:369755] Is it Dolichandra unguis cati?

-- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 29 Dec, 2020, 7:54 pm Saroj Kumar Kasaju, wrote: > Images are not clear but looks close. > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > On Sunday, April 12, 2020 at 10:11:37 PM UTC+5:45 drsmp...@gmail.com > wrote: > >> Checked with Shrikant ji >> It is Dolichanda unguis cati

Re: [efloraofindia:369753] Re: Id of Flower

-- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 29 Dec, 2020, 7:52 pm Saroj Kumar Kasaju, wrote: > Image is not clear but looks like ! > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > On Sunday, April 14, 2013 at 8:25:08 AM UTC+5:45 Aarti S. Khale wrote: > >> Possibly it could be Cat's Claw, Dolichandra unguis-cati. >>

Re: [efloraofindia:369753] FJ7 031113

Wikimedia

Re: [efloraofindia:369752] Is it Dolichandra unguis cati?

Images are not clear but looks close. Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Sunday, April 12, 2020 at 10:11:37 PM UTC+5:45 drsmp...@gmail.com wrote: > Checked with Shrikant ji > It is Dolichanda unguis cati > Dr Satish Phadke > > > On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 at 17:43, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Satish ji. >>

[efloraofindia:369751] Re: Id of Flower

Image is not clear but looks like ! Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Sunday, April 14, 2013 at 8:25:08 AM UTC+5:45 Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Possibly it could be Cat's Claw, Dolichandra unguis-cati. > Regards, > Aarti > > > On Sunday, March 24, 2013 8:28:26 PM UTC+4, Shobha Halwe-Chavda wrote: >> >> Dear

Re: [efloraofindia:369750] Bignonia cupreolata or venusta?

or *Campsis grandiflora *K.Schum. ?? Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Tuesday, December 29, 2020 at 8:00:11 PM UTC+5:45 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > *Campsis radicans *(L.) Seem. ?? BPoI >

Re: [efloraofindia:369749] Bignonia cupreolata or venusta?

*Campsis radicans *(L.) Seem. ?? BPoI Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Wednesday, June 23, 2010 at 5:37:34 AM UTC+5:45

Re: [efloraofindia:369747] Tree for ID :: Zurich, CH :: EU-ARKOCT20

-- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 29 Dec, 2020, 6:56 pm Saroj Kumar Kasaju, wrote: > *Carpinus betulus *L. looks close. > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 2:54:03 PM UTC+5:45 Alka Khare wrote: > >> Thank you Garg ji and Dr. Alastair for providing the ID. >> >>

[efloraofindia:369745] Re: Setting of eflora group

No, this is the page created by me in our new efloraofindia.com site. You try to search on your mail id. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 29 Dec, 2020, 6:53 pm Shobha Chavda, wrote: > Thanks Garg ji. > I checked the page on the given link,but couldn't find the solution.Can i > ask the

Re: [efloraofindia:369745] Tree for ID :: Zurich, CH :: EU-ARKOCT20

*Carpinus betulus *L. looks close. Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 2:54:03 PM UTC+5:45 Alka Khare wrote: > Thank you Garg ji and Dr. Alastair for providing the ID. > > Regards > Alka Khare > > > On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 2:10:31 PM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > >>

Re: [efloraofindia:369744] Fwd: Need help for Identification. TK 2- Berberis sp. ?

*Berberis napaulensis *(DC.) Spreng. only or some other sp.also listed in Nagaland.? Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 7:28:59 PM UTC+5:45 Ushadi wrote: > ilex ;like leaves? > > usha di > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:29 PM, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> >> -- Forwarded

[efloraofindia:369742] Re: Setting of eflora group

Pl. click on the link. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 29 Dec, 2020, 6:29 pm Shobha Chavda, wrote: > Thanks Garg ji.Do I have to search this on Google itself ? > Regards > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 6:19 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Shobha ji, >> Pl. see the following, which may help

Re: [efloraofindia:369741] Berberis sp. from Paddar valley J 04

On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 at 18:11, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > Any possibility for *Berberis parkeriana *C.K.Schneid. ?? > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > On Monday, June 3, 2013 at 11:01:03 AM UTC+5:45 JM Garg wrote: > >> Forwarding again for Id assistance please. >> >> >> >> efi page on Berberis >>

Re: [efloraofindia:369738] Re: Small Tree for ID (17/07/10-NSJ-01)

On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 at 17:53, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > Does not look like matching with *Berberis aquifolium *Pursh ! > Any match to *Berberis borealis *(Takeda) Laferr., *Berberis > jaunsarensis *(Ahrendt) Laferr. > and *Berberis napaulensis *(DC.) Spreng. ?? > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > >

[efloraofindia:369737] Fwd: Setting of eflora group

Thanks, Shobha ji, Pl. see the following, which may help you with the issues Problems/ solutions in new Google groups Pl. let us know if it does not solve/ lessen your issues. -- Forwarded message -

Re: [efloraofindia:369736] Small Plant for ID : Nasik : 09DEC20 : AK-19

I do not find anything to say about the species as per comparative images at Chamaecrista Maybe something else also. On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 11:31, J.M. Garg wrote: > How did you arrive at the id without seeing the no. of leaflets, position >

Re: [efloraofindia:369736] Berberis sp. from Paddar valley J 04

Any possibility for *Berberis parkeriana *C.K.Schneid. ?? Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Monday, June 3, 2013 at 11:01:03 AM UTC+5:45 JM Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > > > efi page on Berberis >

[efloraofindia:369735] Re: Small Tree for ID (17/07/10-NSJ-01)

Does not look like matching with *Berberis aquifolium *Pursh ! Any match to *Berberis borealis *(Takeda) Laferr., *Berberis jaunsarensis *(Ahrendt) Laferr. and *Berberis napaulensis *(DC.) Spreng. ?? Thank you Saroj Kasaju On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 at 6:35:19 PM UTC+5:45 JM Garg wrote: >

Re: [efloraofindia:369733] efloraofindia:''For Id'' is this Launaea species at Talegaon Dabhade :August 2015: MR-02

GBIF . FoPI . Possibility may be for Maharashtra also ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 3:37 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Launaea nudicaulis (L.) Hook.f. does not have

Re: [efloraofindia:369732] efloraofindia:''For Id'' is this Launaea species at Talegaon Dabhade :August 2015: MR-02

Launaea nudicaulis (L.) Hook.f. does not have distribution in India as per Catalogue of life (Although POWO gives it) and as per details at Launaea

Fwd: [efloraofindia:369731] Berries for ID :: Govindghat - Ghangaria, Uttarakhand :: Aug 2018 :: ARKOCT-23

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Saroj Kumar Kasaju Date: Tue, 29 Dec, 2020, 12:17 pm Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:369721] Berries for ID :: Govindghat - Ghangaria, Uttarakhand :: Aug 2018 :: ARKOCT-23 To: efloraofindia Is it wild or cultivated ?

Re: [efloraofindia:369727] Fwd: Berberis angulosa from Uttarakhand (190609SCS1)

-- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 29 Dec, 2020, 12:52 pm Saroj Kumar Kasaju, wrote: > I guess it is close to *Berberis asiatica* Roxb. ex DC. ! > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > On Friday, March 6, 2020 at 8:37:28 PM UTC+5:45 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > >> Thank you Dr. Bhaskar! >> >> Saroj

Re: [efloraofindia:369725] MBNN Fortnight::: Berberidaceae:: Berberis lycium ? Flowers from Chakrata-NS 07

-- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 29 Dec, 2020, 1:20 pm Saroj Kumar Kasaju, wrote: > Berberis thomsoniana C.K.Schneid. ?? > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > On Saturday, November 8, 2014 at 9:37:19 AM UTC+5:45 JM Garg wrote: > >> Forwarding again for Id assistance please. >> >> Some earlier

Re: [efloraofindia:369724] MS, Dec., 2020/09 plant for id

Thanks a lot, Sharad ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 29 Dec, 2020, 1:33 pm Sharad Kambale, wrote: > Dear Sir, > Whether this is tuberous herb? > More photos with closeup will be essential. > At present it doesn't look like Brachystelma. > > Regards, > Sharad > > On Sat, Dec 26,