Re: [efloraofindia:377518] Tree from Talakona

Bark and leaves appear similar to images at Tree from Talakona On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 12:28, J.M. Garg wrote: > Homalium ceylanicum > by any chance > ? > -- Forwarded

[efloraofindia:377514] Re: SK2033 08 July 2019

Thank you Dr. Kumar! Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 11:26 AM Pankaj Kumar wrote: > With those flat and broad bulbs, I would agree with Flickingeria fugax > which is now Dendrobium fugax. > Pankaj > > On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 13:36, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > >> Forwarding for ID >>

Re: [efloraofindia:377513] Re: Orchid for ID, Sikkim NAW-JUL16-07

*Dendrobium amoenum* Wall. ex Lindl. ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 11:27 AM Pankaj Kumar wrote: > This is interesting. What is this ??? > Pankaj > > On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 13:33, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > >> Forwarding for ID >> Distributed as Dendrobium species- South

Re: [efloraofindia:377512] Ficus sp?

Thanks, Paradesi ji On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 15:35, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Not ficus sp. > any more information sir, > With regards. > > > > [image: Mailtrack] > > Sender >

[efloraofindia:377511] Re: Orchid for ID : Atlanta Botanical Garden, Atlanta, USA : 10APR20 : AK-40

It is not easy to say because there is no Dendrobium in America and this is at a garden. If I have to guess I would say: Dendrobium apertum Pankaj On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 13:28, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Dendrobium species- Atlanta, USA >

[efloraofindia:377510] Re: Orchid for ID : Atlanta Botanical Garden, Atlanta, USA : 21APR20 : AK-78

I am not sure this is Dendrobium!! On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 13:31, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Dendrobium species- Atlanta, USA > > Group discussion at

[efloraofindia:377508] Re: Orchid for ID, Sikkim NAW-JUL16-07

This is interesting. What is this ??? Pankaj On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 13:33, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Dendrobium species- South Sikkim > > Group

[efloraofindia:377508] Re: SK2033 08 July 2019

With those flat and broad bulbs, I would agree with Flickingeria fugax which is now Dendrobium fugax. Pankaj On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 13:36, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Dendrobium species- Thapathali, Lalitpur, Nepal >

Re: [efloraofindia:377507] SK2033 08 July 2019

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Dendrobium species- Thapathali, Lalitpur, Nepal Group discussion at SK2033 08 July 2019 (google.com)

[efloraofindia:377505] Re: Orchid for ID, Sikkim NAW-JUL16-07

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Dendrobium species- South Sikkim Group discussion at Orchid for ID, Sikkim NAW-JUL16-07 (google.com)

[efloraofindia:377503] Re: Orchid for ID : Atlanta Botanical Garden, Atlanta, USA : 21APR20 : AK-78

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Dendrobium species- Atlanta, USA Group discussion at Orchid for ID : Atlanta Botanical Garden, Atlanta, USA : 21APR20 : AK-78 (google.com)

[efloraofindia:377498] Re: ORCHIDACEAE Juss. Fortnight: 221013-15 Orchid for id from Manipur BS99

I do think this is Dendrobium williamsonii, but somehow I dont see any hairs on the labellum!! Pankaj On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 13:24, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Dendrobium williamsonii ? >

[efloraofindia:377500] Re: Orchid for ID : Atlanta Botanical Garden, Atlanta, USA : 10APR20 : AK-40

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Dendrobium species- Atlanta, USA Group discussion at Orchid for ID : Atlanta Botanical Garden, Atlanta, USA : 10APR20 : AK-40 (google.com)

[efloraofindia:377498] Re: Leafless plant

Cyrtosia javanica or C. nana. Not easy to make out from these pics, both are found in north east. If I have to guess owing to faint colour of fruit i would say Cyrtosia javanica. But cant confirm. Pankaj On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 12:42, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as

[efloraofindia:377495] Re: Orchidaceae for ID

Very nice. Hope its not planted. Yes Dendrobium moschatum. Pankaj On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 13:21, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Dendrobium moschatum ? > > Group

[efloraofindia:377495] Re: Wild Orchid From Hulikal

Ok Karnataka. I think this is Dendrobium nanum. Not easy to confirm from these pics, but not microbulbon. Pankaj On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 13:20, Pankaj Kumar wrote: > Where is Hulikal? > > On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 13:18, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > >> Forwarding for ID >> Distributed as Dendrobium

Re: [efloraofindia:377495] ORCHIDACEAE Juss. Fortnight: 221013-15 Orchid for id from Manipur BS99

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Dendrobium williamsonii ? Group discussion at ORCHIDACEAE Juss. Fortnight: 221013-15 Orchid for id from Manipur BS99 (google.com)

[efloraofindia:377490] Re: Wild Orchid From Hulikal

Where is Hulikal? On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 13:18, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Dendrobium microbulbon ? > > Group discussion at > Wild Orchid From Hulikal

Re: Fwd: [efloraofindia:377492] Orchidaceae for ID

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Dendrobium moschatum ? Group discussion at Orchidaceae for ID (google.com) On Saturday,

[efloraofindia:377490] Re: Orchid specimen in Bhutan

This should be either Dactylorrhiza hatagirea or Gymnadenia orchidis. Cant confirm from this pic. Pankaj On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 12:44, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Dactylorhiza hatagirea ? >

[efloraofindia:377485] Re: SK573 16 JUN-2017:ID

Yes I mean the same Dr. Kumar! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 11:02 AM Pankaj Kumar wrote: > There are more than one species in this, One with bud does look like > Dendrobium amoenum. > Pankaj > > On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 12:49, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > >> Forwarding for ID >>

[efloraofindia:377483] Re: ORCHIDACEAE Fortnight: Dactylorhiza hatagirea from Uttarakhand DSR_33

Yes I would say Dactylorhiza hatagirea Pankaj On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 12:46, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Dactylorhiza species ?- Uttarakhand > >

[efloraofindia:377483] Re: SK573 16 JUN-2017:ID

There are more than one species in this, One with bud does look like Dendrobium amoenum. Pankaj On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 12:49, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Dendrobium amoenum ? >

Re: [efloraofindia:377485] Fwd: Leafless plant

Four sp. have got distribution in Tripura : - *Cyrtosia lindleyana* Hook.f. & Thomson - *Cyrtosia falconeri* (Hook.f.) Aver., - *Cyrtosia javanica* Blume and - *Cyrtosia nana* (Rolfe ex Downie) Garay And looks closest to *Cyrtosia javanica* Blume ! *Cyrtosia lindleyana*

Re: [efloraofindia:377485] Fwd: [efloraindia:99654] Wild Orchid From Hulikal

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Dendrobium microbulbon ? Group discussion at Wild Orchid From Hulikal (google.com) On Tuesday,

[efloraofindia:377483] Re: Orchids from Sikkim-Darjeeling Tour- Dendrobium for id from Kalimpong:: NS July 18

I need to see the stem. But yes this looks like Dendrobium chrysotoxum. Pankaj On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 13:12, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Dendrobium griffithianum ? >

Re: [efloraofindia:377482] Re: Orchids from Sikkim-Darjeeling Tour- Dendrobium for id from Kalimpong:: NS July 18

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Dendrobium griffithianum ? Group discussion at Orchids from Sikkim-Darjeeling Tour- Dendrobium for id from Kalimpong:: NS July 18 (google.com)

Fwd: [efloraofindia:377479] Plant for ID 13/09/2011 SMP1

Forwarding again for Id assistance please. Some earlier relevant feedback: *Urochloa panicoides *P.Beauv. ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju -- Forwarded message - From: Gurcharan Singh Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 21:16 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:376183] Plant for ID 13/09/2011 SMP1 To:

[efloraofindia:377478] Re: SK573 16 JUN-2017:ID

Yes ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:34 AM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Dendrobium amoenum ? > > Group discussion at > SK573 16

[efloraofindia:377477] Re: SK573 16 JUN-2017:ID

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Dendrobium amoenum ? Group discussion at SK573 16 JUN-2017:ID (google.com) On Tuesday, June 20,

Re: [efloraofindia:377475] ORCHIDACEAE Fortnight: Dactylorhiza hatagirea from Uttarakhand DSR_33

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Dactylorhiza species ?- Uttarakhand Group discussion at ORCHIDACEAE Fortnight: Dactylorhiza hatagirea from Uttarakhand DSR_33 (google.com)

[efloraofindia:377473] Re: Orchid specimen in Bhutan

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Dactylorhiza hatagirea ? Group discussion at Fwd: Orchid specimen in Bhutan (google.com) On

Re: [efloraofindia:377471] Re: Leafless plant

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Cyrtosia nana ? Group discussion at Re: Leafless plant (google.com) On Friday, June 26, 2020 at 9:51:29 PM

[efloraofindia:377469] Fwd: THE LADY SLIPPER ORCHIDS

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Cypripedium species Group discussion at THE LADY SLIPPER ORCHIDS (google.com) -- Forwarded

Re: [efloraofindia:377469] Re: THE LADY SLIPPER ORCHIDS

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Cypripedium species Group discussion at THE LADY SLIPPER ORCHIDS (google.com) On Saturday, October

[efloraofindia:377467] Re: Fwd: Re: Cassia For ID : Lalbagh,Bangalore : 11SEP17 : AK-06

Garg Ji, Is this id eflorain...@gmail.com correct? I found this id on Saroj Ji's replies. But replies sent on this id not reflecting on the group. Regards, Aarti On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 3:02 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > My pleasure! Trying though not all correctly identified ! > Thank you. > >

Re: [efloraofindia:377466] Senna for ID : Nairobi : 110712 : AK-2

Garg Ji, Again, my reply not seen on the group. Hence posting again. Regards, Aarti On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 2:56 PM Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Thanks a lot Garg Ji and Saroj Ji. > Regards, > Aarti > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 1:24 PM Saroj Kumar Kasaju > wrote: > >> ID looks correct as suggested by

Re: [efloraofindia:377465] Cassia laevigata : For ID Confirmation : Muscat,Oman : 170314 : AK-20

Garg Ji, The Eflora id on my reply is probably wrong. So my post is not seen on the group. Hence replying again. Regards, Aarti On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 2:57 PM Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Thanks a lot Garg Ji and Saroj Ji. > Regards, > Aarti > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 2:09 PM Saroj Kumar Kasaju >

Re: [efloraofindia:377465] Balsaminaceae, Geraniaceae and Oxalidaceae Week: Oxalidaceae- The fate of Oxalis dehradunensis- it is Oxalis intermedia-GS-4

This should be typical O. dehradunensis On Monday, May 4, 2020 at 10:02:01 AM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > *Oxalis richardiana* C.R.Babu is give as a syn. of *Oxalis dehradunensis > *M.Bieb.Raizada > as per CoL >

Re: [efloraofindia:377463] Balsaminaceae, Geraniaceae and Oxalidaceae Week: Oxalidaceae-Oxalis latifolia

Distributed as Oxalis latifolia subsp. latifolia (Introduced) As O. dehradunensis and O. latifolia are now treated as distinct species 1. Oxalis latifolia H.B.K: longer stamen filaments 5-6 mm long,

[efloraofindia:377460] Fwd: SK 2875 03 March 2021- Fern

Thanks, Michael ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Michael Sundue <> Date: Sat, 6 Mar, 2021, 11:43 pm Subject: Re: SK 2875 03 March 2021- Fern To: J.M. Garg Hi, They are Pteris but I do not know the species On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 2:54 AM J.M. Garg

Re: [efloraofindia:377460] Herb for ID : Matheran RDS 111012

Thanks, Tapas ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sun, 7 Mar, 2021, 1:39 am Tapas Chakrabarty, wrote: > Garg ji, > Please compare these images with *Phyllanthus narayanswamii *Gamble. > Regards, > Tapas. > > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 3:31 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Tapas ji. >> To me looks

Re: [efloraofindia:377458] DV :: 08 SEP 12 - 1009 :: Phyllanthus ¿ species ? at Sada Waghapur

Thanks, Tapas ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sun, 7 Mar, 2021, 1:37 am Tapas Chakrabarty, wrote: > Thank you Garg ji, for the feedback. > This plant belongs to *Phyllanthus *sungen. *Macraea*. > As regards the identity, it is nearest to *Phyllanthus narayanswamii *Gamble; > the present

Re: [efloraofindia:377455] Fern id please

Dear Dr. Raja, For nearly all ferns one must see the frond-base, not just upper halves as in so many field photos. It is one of the reasons why a herbarium-specimen photo is often better. For Thelypteris species, one also needs to know how the rhizome was, thick-erect with fronds together; thick

Re: [efloraofindia:377455] Need species confirmation...

Dear Dr. Das, Ah, no, Thelypteris (Meniscium) serrata is a Central American species from Cuba and the Caribbean - nothing to do with Asia. Wonder how you found that name? - not in any Asian fern books! One needs to see the well-known literature on Indian ferns, not some random website

Re: [efloraofindia:377456] Re: Flora of Chakrata: Oxalis dehradunensis from Mussoorie Chakrata Motor Marg

Forwarding again for ID confirmation Distributed as Oxalis latifolia subsp. latifolia (Introduced) As O. dehradunensis and O. latifolia are now treated as distinct species 1. Oxalis latifolia H.B.K:

[efloraofindia:377454] Re: any difference in Oxalis dehradunensis and Oxalis latifolia?

Not all Garg ji. Let us scrutinise them. My Kashmir plant is O. latifolia, whereas Chakrata plant is O. dehradunensis. Dr. Gurcharan Singh Retired Associate Professor SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.

Re: [efloraofindia:377452] Herb for ID : Matheran RDS 111012

Garg ji, Please compare these images with *Phyllanthus narayanswamii *Gamble. Regards, Tapas. On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 3:31 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Tapas ji. > To me looks different from images at Phyllanthus urinaria > > > On

Re: [efloraofindia:377452] DV :: 08 SEP 12 - 1009 :: Phyllanthus ¿ species ? at Sada Waghapur

Thank you Garg ji, for the feedback. This plant belongs to *Phyllanthus *sungen. *Macraea*. As regards the identity, it is nearest to *Phyllanthus narayanswamii *Gamble; the present images form a new record for the State of Maharashtra. Best regards, Tapas. On Sat, 6 Mar 2021, 15:31 J.M. Garg,

Re: [efloraofindia:377451] ID requested (DSC3281)

Well, *Bridelia montana *is characterized by being entirely glabrous, and the ovary and fruits are bilocular. However, in *B. verrucosa*, the young parts are reddish-velutinous to tomentose while the ovary and fruits are 1-locular. The attached image is not sufficient to identify the species

Re: [efloraofindia:377450] Herb from Talakona

Ok Paradesi Ji ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 11:01 PM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Saroj Ji, > We have distribution in Andhra Pradesh, it's Occasional, > With regards. > > > [image: Mailtrack] >

Re: [efloraofindia:377449] Herb from Talakona

Saroj Ji, We have distribution in Andhra Pradesh, it's Occasional, With regards. [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack

[efloraofindia:377448] Fwd: any difference in Oxalis dehradunensis and Oxalis latifolia?

-- Forwarded message - From: Sunit Singh Chauhan Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 22:10 Subject: Re: any difference in Oxalis dehradunensis and Oxalis latifolia? To: J.M. Garg Yes sir, i also think so. On Sat, Mar 6, 2021, 10:04 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Singh ji, > So should we

[efloraofindia:377447] Re: any difference in Oxalis dehradunensis and Oxalis latifolia?

Thanks, Singh ji, So should we take our plants as *Oxalis dehradunensis* (syn: *O. latifolia* auct. plur. (non H.B.K.)? On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 21:50, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > According to BSI Flora of India O. latifolia of most Indian authors is O. > dehradunensis. O. latifolia H.B.K. is not

Re: [efloraofindia:377446] Yellow flowers with rannunculus sp.

I think it may come out to be *Ranunculus distans subsp. distans * as per images and details herein. On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 15:30, antul kumar wrote: > Respected Garg sir ji.. please check these.. still no

[efloraofindia:377445] Re: any difference in Oxalis dehradunensis and Oxalis latifolia?

According to BSI Flora of India O. latifolia of most Indian authors is O. dehradunensis. O. latifolia H.B.K. is not listed in the Flora 1. Oxalis latifolia H.B.K: longer stamen filaments 5-6 mm long, hairy in upper part with 1 mm long appendages on outside; shorter filaments glabrous or sparsely

[efloraofindia:377443] Re: SK238DEC14-2016:ID

Not easy to confirm without flowers. I am thinking why not Pholidota ? But cant confirm. Pankaj On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 15:40, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Coelogyne species ?- Gaurati, Chautara, Nepal >

[efloraofindia:377443] Re: MS Oct.2016/37 Coelogyne nitida

Could be Coelogyne nitida, but cant be confirmed. Pankaj On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 16:42, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Coelogyne nitida ? > > > Group discussion at

[efloraofindia:377442] Re: An Orchid to Share 300610 ET

Possible but this is not a good image to confirm. Pankaj On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 16:45, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Coelogyne nervosa ? > > > Group discussion at

[efloraofindia:377441] Re: Conchidium species ID required : Matheran 021012

I will guess this to be Conchidium filiforme, now this is called Porpax filiformis. Pankaj On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 16:49, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Conchidium species >

[efloraofindia:377439] Re: AnOrchid: Terrestrial from Yellowstone National Park USA

Wow, you saw this in wild I assume. Not an easy thing to see... Yes Corallorhiza mertensiana On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 16:53, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Corallorhiza mertensiana ? >

[efloraofindia:377439] Re: SK1015 15 MAR-2018

This should be Coelogyne fimbriata. I need to know the size.. Pankaj On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 16:39, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Coelogyne ovalis ? > > > Group

[efloraofindia:377437] Re: Orchidaceae Fortnight:: For ID (NSJ-14)

This should be Cymbidium lowianum. Pankaj On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 19:31, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Cymbidium lowianum ? > > > Group discussion at >

[efloraofindia:377437] Re: SK 2495 01 March 2020

This should be Cymbidium lowianum. Pankaj On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 19:35, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Cymbidium lowianum ? > > > Group discussion at > SK 2495

[efloraofindia:377435] Re: More of Orchids and cactii from March trip to Kalimpong.Lava Neoraand G.natinal park

I think this is a hybrid with Cymbidium parishii Pankaj On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 19:38, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Cymbidium species ? > > > Group discussion at

Re: [efloraofindia:377435] Herb from Talakona

Thanks a lot. http://flora-peninsula-indica.ces.iisc.ac.in/index.php? On Sat, 6 Mar, 2021, 21:17 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > Flora of Peninsular India ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 9:31 PM bharathi raja > wrote: > >> What is FoPI? >> >> On Sat, 6 Mar, 2021, 19:44

[efloraofindia:377433] Re: Orchidaceae Fortnight:: Cymbidium Sp. (NSJ-09)

This should be Cymbidium aloifolium. Pankaj On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 19:41, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Cymbidium bicolor or Cymbidium aloifolium > > >

[efloraofindia:377433] Re: Orchidaceae fortnight :: Hybrid 5 :: SMP 26

This should be Cymbidium bicolor. Pankaj On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 19:43, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Cymbidium bicolor or Cymbidium aloifolium > > > Group

[efloraofindia:377429] Re: ID Help 2

If I have to guess, this should be Cymbidium bicolor. Pankaj On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 19:49, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Cymbidium species- Andaman Island >

Re: [efloraofindia:377431] Herb from Talakona

Flora of Peninsular India ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 9:31 PM bharathi raja wrote: > What is FoPI? > > On Sat, 6 Mar, 2021, 19:44 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > >> Has it got distribution in AP? FoPI says no. >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at

[efloraofindia:377428] Re: identification

This is very much like Cymbidium tracyanum. Pankaj On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 19:52, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Cymbidium species/ hybrids- Darjeeling >

Fwd: [efloraofindia:377429] Berries identification

Please always copy to efi and Mr. Garg while corresponding. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju -- Forwarded message - From: antul kumar Date: Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 8:52 PM Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:377376] Berries identification To: Saroj Kasaju Thank you On Sat, Mar 6, 2021, 8:18

Re: [efloraofindia:377428] Herb from Talakona

What is FoPI? On Sat, 6 Mar, 2021, 19:44 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > Has it got distribution in AP? FoPI says no. > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 7:16 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Hi, Bharathi ji, >> Can you show a good close of the bracts, which is not clear even on >>

Re: [efloraofindia:377427] MS May, 2016/24 Aeschynanthus sp. for ID

Thanks, Sawmliana ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sat, 6 Mar, 2021, 5:28 pm M Sawmliana, wrote: > Aeschynanthus acuminatus, A.gracilis, A.maculatus, A.manii, A.masoniae, > A.parasiticus, A.parviflorus, A.sikkimensis and A.superbus are recorded in > Mizoram. > > On Thu, 4 Mar, 2021, 9:36 pm

[efloraofindia:377426] Fwd: any difference in Oxalis dehradunensis and Oxalis latifolia?

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Sunit Singh Chauhan Date: Sat, 6 Mar, 2021, 8:28 pm Subject: Re: any difference in Oxalis dehradunensis and Oxalis latifolia? To: J.M. Garg just checked sir, thanks to all. On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 3:50 PM J.M. Garg

Re: [efloraofindia:377425] ID requested (DSC3281)

It would be interesting to know differences between Bridelia montana (Roxb.) Willd. and B. verrucosa Haines, while both are recorded from Eastern Himalayas, latter extends to Uttarakhand. Dr. Gurcharan Singh Retired Associate Professor SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007

Re: [efloraofindia:377424] Berries identification

*Solanum pseudo-capsicum* L. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 4:53 PM antul kumar wrote: > Requested for identification > Location mandi Himachal pradesh > March 2021 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To

Re: [efloraofindia:377423] Fwd: Orchidaceae fortnight :: Hybrid 5 :: SMP 26

I always get confused between these two! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 5:28 PM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Cymbidium bicolor or Cymbidium aloifolium >

Re: [efloraofindia:377421] Plant for ID: SD062

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 5:48 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Saroj ji, for the id. > Yes, I think it appears close to images at Vicia sativa subsp. sativa > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 14:38, Saroj

Re: [efloraofindia:377421] Tree ID from Bangladesh SM071

Thank you all. Regards, Tapas. On Sat, 6 Mar 2021, 15:25 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks, Surajit ji and Tapas ji. > This appears close to images at Tree for ID SMP April2016 > > (identified > as Litsea monopetala >

Re: [efloraofindia:377420] Herb from Talakona

Has it got distribution in AP? FoPI says no. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 7:16 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Hi, Bharathi ji, > Can you show a good close of the bracts, which is not clear even on > enlarging? > I am doubtful as per images at Eranthemum roseum >

Re: [efloraofindia:377419] MS, Feb,2021/04 Gentiana sp. for id

*Gentiana nudicaulis *Kurz Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 7:29 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Sawmliana ji > > -- Forwarded message - > From: M Sawmliana > Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 19:09 > Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:376702] MS, Feb,2021/04 Gentiana sp. for id

Re: [efloraofindia:377418] Tree from Talakona

I agree with you. On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 5:37 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it is very difficult to id, with such images without flowers and > fruits. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Bharathi raja > Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 14:50 > Subject: [efloraofindia:377093] Tree from

Re: Fwd: [efloraofindia:377416] Elatostema from East Sikkim for id pl.

Thanks, Dr. Fu. Is it Female inflorescence ? Matches with GBIF - specimen from Sikkim On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 15:21, J.M. Garg

Re: [efloraofindia:377414] MS, Feb,2021/04 Gentiana sp. for id

Thanks, Sawmliana ji. Any keys ? On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 17:37, M Sawmliana wrote: > Gentiana loureirii, G.napulifera, G.nudicaulis, G.parrryae and > G.pedicellata are recorded in Mizoram. > > On Sat, 6 Mar, 2021, 5:26 pm J.M. Garg, wrote: > >> Hi, Sawmliana ji, >> What are the species reported

Re: [efloraofindia:377414] Herb from Talakona

Hi, Bharathi ji, Can you show a good close of the bracts, which is not clear even on enlarging? I am doubtful as per images at Eranthemum roseum On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 15:21, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: [efloraofindia:377413] climber From Talakona

To me looks different from images at Ventilago madraspatana On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 15:20, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ventilago maderaspatana, > With regards. > > > > [image: Mailtrack] >

Re: [efloraofindia:377411] Re: Herb ID from Bangladesh SM122

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Wild herb from Dhaka Group discussion at Herb ID from Bangladesh SM122 (google.com) On Sunday,

[efloraofindia:377409] Re: Herb ID from Bangladesh SM107

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Wild herb from Dhaka Group discussion at Herb ID from Bangladesh SM107 (google.com) On Monday,

Re: [efloraofindia:377407] “Fabaceae (Faboideae) Fortnight :: for ID from Talegaon Dabhade Pune —MROCT04"

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Wild herb at Talegaon Dabhade Pune I hope Trigonella foenum-graecum Group discussion at “Fabaceae (Faboideae) Fortnight :: for ID from Talegaon Dabhade Pune —MROCT04"

[efloraofindia:377405] Wild flowers at Dulhousie

Wild flowers at Dulhousie No thread available, page should be deleted Wild flowers at Dulhousie - efloraofindia (google.com)

Re: [efloraofindia:377403] Wild Bush For ID : California : 24NOV14 : AK-56

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Wild Bush- California Group discussion at Wild Bush For ID : California : 24NOV14 : AK-56 (google.com)

[efloraofindia:377399] Fwd: Requesting ID of this white flower at the VJTI show - Mumbai :: 02092013 :: ARK-02 :: February 2013

Forwarding for ID Distributed as White flowers at VJTI Flower Show in Mumbai Group discussion at Requesting ID of this white flower at the VJTI show - Mumbai :: 02092013

Re: [efloraofindia:377400] Requesting ID of this white flower at the VJTI show - Mumbai :: 02092013 :: ARK-02 :: February 2013

Forwarding for ID Distributed as White flowers at VJTI Flower Show in Mumbai Group discussion at Requesting ID of this white flower at the VJTI show - Mumbai :: 02092013

Re: [efloraofindia:377397] Plant for ID: SD062

Thanks, Saroj ji, for the id. Yes, I think it appears close to images at Vicia sativa subsp. sativa On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 14:38, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Vicia sativa ?? > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at

[efloraofindia:377397] Fwd: X'mas tree

Forwarding for ID Distributed as West Bengal- Kalimpong- X'mas tree Group discussion at X'mas tree (google.com) -- Forwarded message

[efloraofindia:377397] Re: X'mas tree

Forwarding for ID Distributed as West Bengal- Kalimpong- X'mas tree Group discussion at X'mas tree (google.com) On Sunday, November 5, 2017

[efloraofindia:377394] Fwd: id please Barasat,WEST BENGAL,14.12.16

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Unidentified WEST BENGAL- Barasat plant Group discussion at id please Barasat,WEST BENGAL,14.12.16 (google.com)

Re: [efloraofindia:377395] id please Barasat,WEST BENGAL,14.12.16

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Unidentified WEST BENGAL- Barasat plant Group discussion at id please Barasat,WEST BENGAL,14.12.16 (google.com)

Re: [efloraofindia:377392] MS, Feb,2021/04 Gentiana sp. for id

Hi, Sawmliana ji, What are the species reported from your area? On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 13:34, J.M. Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: M Sawmliana > Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 at 23:01 > Subject: [efloraofindia:376702] MS,

  1   2   >