Re: [efloraofindia:384916] Resembles with Geum aleppicum

Hi, Shakir ji, *Pl. always mention at least date and place in Kashmir.* *Geum aleppicum *does not have any distribution in India as per POWO . It may be Geum roylei ,

Re: [efloraofindia:384915] Fwd: Requesting ID of this plant by the roadside - Oct 2013 :: 26MAR2014 :: ARK-24

Hi, Alka ji, May I request you to pl. post a high resolution image. On Sat, 1 May 2021 at 20:50, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > No doubt in it, I damn sure in that Garg Ji, we need repost close-ups > from posted author, > With regards. > > > > [image: Mailtrack] >

[efloraofindia:384911] Re: Plumbago zeylanica

ID looks good. Neverthesess post the picture of habit and foliage. On Friday, May 7, 2021 at 9:21:40 PM UTC+5:30 seemabinzee786 wrote: > Habit: shrub > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [efloraofindia:384910] Re: 81 ID wild plant Physalis minima

*Physalis lagascae*. Roem. & Schult. On Saturday, May 8, 2021 at 6:53:54 AM UTC+5:30 seemabinzee786 wrote: > Physalis minima > > On Sat, May 8, 2021, 12:14 AM Sam Kuzhalanattu > wrote: > >> Sharing more images. >> >> On Sat, 8 May 2021, 12:10 am Sam Kuzhalanattu, >> wrote: >> >>> Dear

[efloraofindia:384908] Re: Request for Jasminum id

Thanks a lot, sir. *Thanks & Regards* Sunit Singh Chauhan Ph.D. Research Scholar Department of Botany HNB Central University Garhwal Uttarakhand. ORCID id:- https://orcid.org/-0003-1938-887X On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 4:07 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > WCSP

Re: [efloraofindia:384907] Re: 81 ID wild plant Physalis minima

Physalis minima On Sat, May 8, 2021, 12:14 AM Sam Kuzhalanattu wrote: > Sharing more images. > > On Sat, 8 May 2021, 12:10 am Sam Kuzhalanattu, > wrote: > >> Dear Members, >> Please ID wild plant, regards, Sam. >> >> Location: near Reserve Forest, Chathamattom, Ernakulam District, (Kochi) >>

Re: [efloraofindia:384904] Anemone tschernjaewi Regel.

Thanks a lot. On Fri, 7 May, 2021, 10:05 pm J.M. Garg, wrote: > This is the correct way. > > On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 21:54, Shakir ahmad (Ammatuer Taxonomist) < > saadikshakir...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Sir,Is this correct way to get my pics added on efloraofindia site.. Or >> should I follow

Re: [efloraofindia:384903] Anemone tschernjaewi Regel.

This is the correct way. On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 21:54, Shakir ahmad (Ammatuer Taxonomist) < saadikshakir...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sir,Is this correct way to get my pics added on efloraofindia site.. Or > should I follow other methods? > > On Fri, 7 May, 2021, 8:55 pm J.M. Garg, wrote: > >>

Re: [efloraofindia:384902] Re: IDENTITY : 54

I only used the KEY in the "Bengal Plants", Sir, since this species is wild. I will check our database for other uploads of red *Leea*. Thank you. Best regards, Surajit Koley On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 21:40, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Surajit ji. > May I request you to have a look at *Leea

Re: [efloraofindia:384900] Re: strange looking plant ID from Hooghly 03-05-12 SK-2

Sir, I agree with Pankaj ji's id suggestion - *Dracaena marginata*, we have it in our database, and it looks similar to GBIF - https://www.gbif.org/species/5304439. Thank you. Best regards, Surajit Koley On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 12:02, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as

Re: [efloraofindia:384900] TSPAUG2015-6: Images of Dendrobium panduratum shared.

Thanks again Pankaj ji and Garg ji regards tspkumar On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:46 PM Pankaj Kumar wrote: > Yes sir!! > > On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 15:12, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Taking it as *Dendrobium panduratum* subsp. *villosum* as per >> discussions at Orchid-20 _ID requested >>

Re: [efloraofindia:384899] Re: IDENTITY : 54

Thanks, Surajit ji. May I request you to have a look at *Leea guineense* G.Don Your sharp yes may find some *Leea alata* Edgew over here, On Sat, 1 May 2021 at 18:55, surajit koley wrote: > It is *Leea alata* Edgew, I

Re: [efloraofindia:384898] TSP1092015-1 for ID assistance.

Thanks Pankaj ji and Garg ji regards tspkumar On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:46 PM Pankaj Kumar wrote: > 100% > > On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 15:14, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Taking it as *Dendrobium panduratum* subsp. *villosum* as per >> discussions at Orchid-20 _ID requested >>

Re: [efloraofindia:384897] Orchid-20 _ID requested

Thanks Garg ji and Pankaj ji for your relentless efforts at nailing the ID regards tspkumar On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:47 PM Pankaj Kumar wrote: > Yes sir > > On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 15:11, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Taking it as *Dendrobium panduratum* subsp. *villosum* as per >> discussions at

[efloraofindia:384896] Re: Plant for ID : Muscat : 11OCT20 : AK-19

Gurcharan Ji, Thanks for forwarding this post from Muscat. Regards, Aarti On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 9:15 AM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Cordyline australis ? >

Re: [efloraofindia:384892] 184-TSP-ID-16APR2021-2-Dendrobium sp @ Devaramane for ID assistance

Noted with thanks. Pankaj ji regards tspkumar On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 2:19 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Ok, Pankaj ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Fri, 7 May, 2021, 1:55 pm Pankaj Kumar, wrote: > >> It is not possible to confirm all plants because pics are not appropriate. >> Pankaj >>

Re: [efloraofindia:384890] Re: Tree from Goa_ for id

This Lagerstroemia species can attain quite a good size where there is moisture and depth of soil. Please observe the bark which is very distinctive when it peels and flakes off as well as after this process is over. On Fri, 7 May 2021, 09:36 Neha Singh, wrote: > Thank you Radha ji, Garg Ji for

Re: [efloraofindia:384889] Re: Tree from Goa_ for id

Thank you Radha ji, Garg Ji for the id. I am grateful. Is is so that Lagerstroemia microcarpa grows to larger heights in areas with heavier rainfall (than in areas with lesser rainfall? ) On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:08 PM J.M. Garg

Re: [efloraofindia:384888] Fwd: Schefflera - Araliaceae

Perhaps yes - http://www.plantgenera.org/illustration.php?id_illustration=4931=2=0 but It took me quite some time to locate it in the Flora of British India. Please note, all the resources we are using, like KEW, GBIF, FoC, FoP are continuously updating their database, as we do too. The entry in

Re: [efloraofindia:384887] Anemone tschernjaewi Regel.

Beautiful image. On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 18:41, Shakir ahmad (Ammatuer Taxonomist) < saadikshakir...@gmail.com> wrote: > Location: Kashmir, J > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [efloraofindia:384886] Fwd: Schefflera - Araliaceae

Thanks, Kanhaiya Lal ji On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 20:40, Kanhaiya Lal Chaudhary wrote: > I would suspect Schfflera pueckleri more > > On Fri, 7 May 2021, 20:37 J.M. Garg, wrote: > >> Thanks, Kanhaiya Lal ji >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J. M. Garg >> >> On Fri, 7 May, 2021, 8:34 pm Kanhaiya Lal

Re: [efloraofindia:384885] Fwd: Schefflera - Araliaceae

Thanks, Kanhaiya Lal ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Fri, 7 May, 2021, 8:34 pm Kanhaiya Lal Chaudhary, < klchaudhar...@gmail.com> wrote: > More likely to be Tupidanthes calyptratus ( now name revised) > > On Fri, 7 May 2021, 18:34 J.M. Garg, wrote: > >> Can it be *Schefflera roxburghii*

Re: [efloraofindia:384883] Re: Meliaceae member like Dysoxylum

No, Sir, I wouldn't go for *Amoora rohituka* =* Aphanamixis polystachya* (Wallich) R. Parker,, because it has 3-loculicidal capsule. Similarly no *Dysoxylum* either has 5-locular capsule (as per Flora of British India. Though Flora of China says it has, but I couldn't find any.. Only, *Amoora

Re: [efloraofindia:384882] Sir I want to contribute plants on ur site

Thanks, Seema ji. Pl. post on the mail as given in cc. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Fri, 7 May, 2021, 7:44 pm Seema Bin Zeenat, wrote: > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

[efloraofindia:384881] Sir I want to contribute plants on ur site

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit

Re: [efloraofindia:384880] from Pakke-Kessang district Arunachal pradesh.

If I am to follow the KEY in eFI page, I agree with you, Sir, but the leaves in the submitted picture have more tapering apices and base. Yes, the submitted picture does bear leaves featuring both having "dentate margin" as well as "entire margin". Thank you. Best regards, Surajit Koley On Fri,

Re: [efloraofindia:384877] Alocasia sp. for ID (Araceae)

Again, it should be *Alocasia fallax* Schott. Thank you. Best regards, Surajit Koley On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 20:52, J.M. Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > > *Alocasia acuminata* >

[efloraofindia:384876] Fwd: SYMBIOSIS : 1508

Thanks, Bimal ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Bimal Sar kar Date: Fri, 7 May, 2021, 5:53 pm Subject: SYMBIOSIS : 1508 To: Attaching a collage of Lime Butterfly visiting flowers of Ziziphus jujuba. -- You received this message because you are

Re: [efloraofindia:384875] MSJune,2015/06 Araceae

I think, it would be *Alocasia fallax* Schott - http://plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:84167-1 and https://www.gbif.org/species/5329901 The species is confined in Sikkim Himalaya and Khasia, as per F-B-I. Unfortunately, neither the F-B-I nor the internet provides me

[efloraofindia:384874] SYMBIOSIS : 1508

Attaching a collage of Lime Butterfly visiting flowers of Ziziphus jujuba. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Fwd: [efloraofindia:384873] Fwd: Climber for ID (RD_17112011b)

I do not see any other option than *Tetrastigma serrulatum *(Roxb.) Planch.. Flowering pattern may differ I guess! SK 2291 13 November 2019 ! Thank you Saroj Kasaju -- Forwarded message - From: JM Garg

Re: [efloraofindia:384872] Re: Meliaceae member like Dysoxylum

Thanks, Surajit ji. To me looks different. What do you say about *Aphanamixis polystachya* (Wall.) R.Parker ? On Sat, 1 May 2021 at 13:11, surajitno...@gmail.com < surajitnotavaila...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: [efloraofindia:384871] Re: weed from Jhansi 1

*Melilotus indica* (L.) All. ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 3:44 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I find it different from images at Trigonella foenum-graecum > > Also could not find a match as per comparative images at

Re: [efloraofindia:384870] Re: Devalgarh Uttarakhand: request for id

I agree with Rawat ji for Acrocarpus fraxinifolius as per images and as per IBP , FOI , UTP

[efloraofindia:384869] Re: Devalgarh Uttarakhand: request for id

On Sat, 1 May 2021 at 13:01, Sunit Singh wrote: > Sure, will do that. > > On Sat, May 1, 2021, 12:58 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Sunit ji. >> Pl. post habit and other images. >> >> On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 07:18, J.M. Garg wrote: >> >>> Thanks, Sunit ji >>> >>> -- >>> With regards, >>> J.

[efloraofindia:384868] Re: Request for Jasminum id

WCSP considers the following as its synonyms: *Jasminum** roxburghianum* Wall. ex C.B.Clarke in J.D.Hooker, Fl. Brit. India 3: 595 (1882). *Jasminum** latifolium* Roxb., Fl. Ind.

[efloraofindia:384867] Re: Request for Jasminum id

This is *Jasminum arborescens* as per *keys* in Flora of Pakistan and as per GBIF specimen from India- one

[efloraofindia:384865] Re: weed from Jhansi 1

I find it different from images at Trigonella foenum-graecum Also could not find a match as per comparative images at Trigonella and Medicago

Re: [efloraofindia:384864] from Pakke-Kessang district Arunachal pradesh.

Thanks, Surajit ji. After going through the keys in Flora of Bhutan as available at Embelia and GBIF specimens of *Embelia vestita* Roxb. and *Embelia gamblei* Kurz ex C.B.Clarke

Re: [efloraofindia:384863] 184-TSP-ID-16APR2021-2-Dendrobium sp @ Devaramane for ID assistance

Ok, Pankaj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Fri, 7 May, 2021, 1:55 pm Pankaj Kumar, wrote: > It is not possible to confirm all plants because pics are not appropriate. > Pankaj > > On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 16:23, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Pankaj ji, >> So I take most of the posts under

Re: [efloraofindia:384862] Re: 111-TSP-ID-07OCT2016-3:Dendrobium sp @ Kottigehara-3 for ID

Thanks, Pankaj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Fri, 7 May, 2021, 2:04 pm Dr Pankaj Kumar, wrote: > Ok I am inclined to call this Dendrobium heyneanum. I see no hairs and > then the margin is crenate. > Pankaj > > > On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 09:38:28 UTC+8 Dr Pankaj Kumar wrote: > >> I

[efloraofindia:384862] Re: 111-TSP-ID-07OCT2016-3:Dendrobium sp @ Kottigehara-3 for ID

Ok I am inclined to call this Dendrobium heyneanum. I see no hairs and then the margin is crenate. Pankaj On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 09:38:28 UTC+8 Dr Pankaj Kumar wrote: > I will quote from Memoirs of Seidenfaden although I am not a big fan of > this book: > "This species is often

[efloraofindia:384861] Re: 110-TSP-ID-07OCT2016-2: Dendrobium sp @ Kottigehara-2 for ID

Ok I am sorry this is Dendrobium panduratum var. villosum. Pankaj On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 13:49:05 UTC+8 tsp kumar wrote: > Thanks Pankaj ji > regards > > On 12 Oct 2016 07:10, "Dr Pankaj Kumar" wrote: > >> Yes I will say this is heyneanum. >> Please check my comment on other post. >>

Re: [efloraofindia:384859] 184-TSP-ID-16APR2021-2-Dendrobium sp @ Devaramane for ID assistance

It is not possible to confirm all plants because pics are not appropriate. Pankaj On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 16:23, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Pankaj ji, > So I take most of the posts under D.heyneanum as D.panduratum subsp. > villosum. > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Fri, 7 May, 2021, 1:44

Re: [efloraofindia:384858] 184-TSP-ID-16APR2021-2-Dendrobium sp @ Devaramane for ID assistance

Thanks, Pankaj ji, So I take most of the posts under D.heyneanum as D.panduratum subsp. villosum. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Fri, 7 May, 2021, 1:44 pm Pankaj Kumar, wrote: > Yes sir > There was a time when I made some mistakes in identification of these > particular plants and labelled them

Re: [efloraofindia:384857] 184-TSP-ID-16APR2021-2-Dendrobium sp @ Devaramane for ID assistance

Yes sir There was a time when I made some mistakes in identification of these particular plants and labelled them either as Dendrobium heyneanum or Dendrobium panduratum. One basic difference between them is the presence of hairs on the labellum towards base, which would be visible in front view

Re: [efloraofindia:384856] 184-TSP-ID-16APR2021-2-Dendrobium sp @ Devaramane for ID assistance

Thanks, Pankaj ji. But you have identified many posts as Dendrobium heyneanum as per details herein. On Sat, 1 May 2021 at 11:12, Pankaj Kumar wrote: > I cant see the base of the labellum clearly so I cant confirm, but I would > guess

Re: [efloraofindia:384855] Re: SK 2436 06 February 2020

We even have oblique leaf picture - https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/b155584a74132/DSC_0127%20copy.JPG?part=0.1=1=ANaJVrEvb9j3oBkSaYoS--TjBJ-JWdrPGJDPM2yQ33zMuCWoXLTbN8tesd0PZoJEYTCss5YnUnxm9fa8ThWOH0BtpBox0jqfY_Vws-AKJsp_-tr85k-qtkU at eFI page (please scroll down to end of

Re: [efloraofindia:384854] Re: SK 2436 06 February 2020

Yes, Sir, I do agree 100%, instead of looking at the "single leaf" picture, please compare the leaves present in the other pictures. Thank you. Best regards, Surajit Koley On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 12:59, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Surajit ji. > Do you agree with Radha ji's id? > I am not fully

Re: [efloraofindia:384853] Re: SK 2436 06 February 2020

Thanks, Surajit ji. Do you agree with Radha ji's id? I am not fully satisfied. Leaves also look slightly different. Can there be some other wild species close to it? On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 12:47, surajit koley wrote: > Ok, Sir ji, I made the mistake. first taking it as a 70 ft tree, then a >

[efloraofindia:384852] Re: For Id from Assam 1

The only *Euonymus*, described in Fl.Br.Ind., comes closer to this one is *E. lucidus*, but here, in the uploaded pics, leaves are not serrate or even serrulate. *So, please don't waste time searching **Euonymus.* *The plant is something else.* Thank you. Best regards, Surajit Koley On Fri, 7

Re: [efloraofindia:384851] Re: SK 2436 06 February 2020

These are just green fruit, Sir! Saroj ji might have picked ripe fruits from the ground below. Thank you. Best regards, Surajit Koley On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 10:44, J.M. Garg wrote: > Green fruits are different from images at *Cestrum nocturnum >

Re: [efloraofindia:384846] Re: 76 ID wild plant

Dear Garg ji, Viplav ji, all Members, Great Viplav ji. Yes, it is Garg ji. Thank you very much for identified the wild plant, regards, Sam. On Fri, 7 May 2021, 11:03 am J.M. Garg, wrote: > I think Salacia fruticosa > as per images > and

Re: [efloraofindia:384847] Re: SK 2436 06 February 2020

Ok, Sir ji, I made the mistake. first taking it as a 70 ft tree, then a shrub having 15-20 ft ranches. I apologize. However, all your pictures can be compared with the images available at - 1. http://plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:316386-2 2.

Re: [efloraofindia:384846] Orchid-20 _ID requested

Yes sir On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 15:11, J.M. Garg wrote: > Taking it as *Dendrobium panduratum* subsp. *villosum* as per discussions > at Orchid-20 _ID requested > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Tsp Kumar > Date: Thu,

Re: [efloraofindia:384846] TSP1092015-1 for ID assistance.

100% On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 15:14, J.M. Garg wrote: > Taking it as *Dendrobium panduratum* subsp. *villosum* as per discussions > at Orchid-20 _ID requested > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: tsp kumar > Date: Tue, 1

Re: [efloraofindia:384846] TSPAUG2015-6: Images of Dendrobium panduratum shared.

Yes sir!! On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 15:12, J.M. Garg wrote: > Taking it as *Dendrobium panduratum* subsp. *villosum* as per discussions > at Orchid-20 _ID requested > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: tsp kumar > Date: Sun,

Re: [efloraofindia:384842] Re: SK 2436 06 February 2020

Yes, Madam, I also saw them growing in the wild. I just couldn't visualize that they can attain such a height to call them trees! Of-course I am not that good observant, at least, was not observant at all before joining eFI. Thank you. Best regards, Surajit Koley On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 08:41,

Re: [efloraofindia:384841] Tree for id_Maval_Pune

I will also like to go with Radha ji as per images and details at Cordia macleodii On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 at 22:04, radha veach wrote: > To me this has the look of Cordia sp., possibly *Cordia macleodii. *Close > up images of the leaves

Re: [efloraofindia:384840] Fwd: Flower for ID - New York - 021113 - RK - 1

Hosta 'Blue Angel' Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:21 PM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Hosta species- New York > > Group discussion at >

[efloraofindia:384839] Re: SK1197 12 JUNE 2018

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Maianthemum species- Sandakphu, West Bengal Group discussion at SK1197 12 JUNE 2018 (google.com)

Re: [efloraofindia:384836] Re: Tree from Goa_ for id

I have seen Radha ji hardly going wrong. I agree with her id here also as per images and details at Lagerstroemia microcarpa On Sat, 1 May 2021 at 06:39, radha veach wrote: > Lagerstroemia microcarpa! Seed capsules are in the

Re: [efloraofindia:384836] Re: Flower for ID - New York - 021113 - RK - 1

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Hosta species- New York Group discussion at Flower for ID - New York - 021113 - RK - 1 (google.com)

Re: [efloraofindia:384834] Re: strange looking plant ID from Hooghly 03-05-12 SK-2

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Cordyline fruticosa ? Group discussion at strange looking plant ID from Hooghly 03-05-12 SK-2 (google.com)

[efloraofindia:384832] Fwd: A dracaena in flower

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Dracaena marginata ? Group discussion at A dracaena in flower (google.com) -- Forwarded

[efloraofindia:384832] Re: [indiantreepix:13494] A dracaena in flower

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Dracaena marginata ? Group discussion at A dracaena in flower (google.com) On Tuesday, July 7, 2009