Re: [efloraofindia:388808] Unknwon plants from Assam KD 01 Jun 2021

Peristylus constrictus. Thanks for sharing. Pankaj On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 13:03, J.M. Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for validation please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > *Peristylus constrictus *(Lindl.) Lindl. ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > -- Forwarded message - >

Re: [efloraofindia:388808] Fwd: Id Rhamnus species.

Rhamnus persica Boiss. ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:57 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > > Yes, could not find a match as per existing species as per comparative > images at Rhamnus

Re: [efloraofindia:388807] Fwd: id request Asparagus

Wild or cultivated ? Can you please post full plant / habitat image?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 7:08 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Sunit ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Sunit Singh > Date: Mon, 14 Jun, 2021,

Re: [efloraofindia:388806] Fwd: id request Asparagus

*Asparagus capitatus *Baker ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 7:08 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Sunit ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Sunit Singh > Date: Mon, 14 Jun, 2021, 11:36 pm > Subject: id request Asparagus >

Re: [efloraofindia:388803] Fwd: id request Lespedeza

*Lespedeza floribunda *Bunge ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 7:09 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Sunit ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Sunit Singh > Date: Tue, 15 Jun, 2021, 12:16 am > Subject: id request Lespedeza >

Re: [efloraofindia:388797] Fwd: Combretum nanum @ Khargar Hills

Thanks a lot, Tapas ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 15 Jun, 2021, 1:55 am Tapas Chakrabarty, wrote: > I have now seen the key to the species. Yes, this is *Combretum > roxburghii.* > Regards, > Tapas. > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 10:43 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Appears to be four. >> >>

Re: [efloraofindia:388796] Fwd: Combretum nanum @ Khargar Hills

I have now seen the key to the species. Yes, this is *Combretum roxburghii.* Regards, Tapas. On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 10:43 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Appears to be four. > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Mon, 14 Jun, 2021, 10:21 pm Tapas Chakrabarty, > wrote: > >> How many wings are there

Re: [efloraofindia:388795] Crassulaceae, Combretaceae and Myrtaceae Fortnight: Combretaceae member for identification from Hamirpur (H.P.)

Thank you, Garg ji Regards On Mon, 14 Jun 2021, 10:05 pm Sunit Singh, wrote: > Yes no doubt, it's Combretum nanum. > Stunted, procumbent, glabrous undershrub. Leaves opposite, sometimes > alternate, broadly obovate to ovate lanceolate. > > Distribution; outer Himalaya, from Garhwal to Sikkim

Re: [efloraofindia:388794] Fwd: Combretum nanum @ Khargar Hills

Appears to be four. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon, 14 Jun, 2021, 10:21 pm Tapas Chakrabarty, wrote: > How many wings are there in fruits, 4 or 5? > > On Mon, 14 Jun 2021, 22:12 Sunit Singh, wrote: > >> It seems scandent shrub, might be C. roxburghii. >> >> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021, 10:03 PM

Re: [efloraofindia:388793] Fwd: Combretum nanum @ Khargar Hills

How many wings are there in fruits, 4 or 5? On Mon, 14 Jun 2021, 22:12 Sunit Singh, wrote: > It seems scandent shrub, might be C. roxburghii. > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021, 10:03 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> I think this may not be *Combretum nanum* as per discussions at Id >> confirmation Combretum

Re: [efloraofindia:388792] Fwd: Combretum nanum @ Khargar Hills

It seems scandent shrub, might be C. roxburghii. On Mon, Jun 14, 2021, 10:03 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think this may not be *Combretum nanum* as per discussions at Id > confirmation Combretum nanum > > > -- Forwarded message

Re: [efloraofindia:388790] Fwd: Combretum nanum @ Khargar Hills

Combretum roxburghii? I will check. On Mon, 14 Jun 2021, 22:03 J.M. Garg, wrote: > I think this may not be *Combretum nanum* as per discussions at Id > confirmation Combretum nanum > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: JM

[efloraofindia:388790] Re: SK475 03 APR-2017:ID

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 9:52 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it will be *Cerastium glomeratum* as per discussions at Confusion > between Cerastium fontanum subsp. vulgare and Cerastium glomeratum > and

Re: [efloraofindia:388789] Crassulaceae, Combretaceae and Myrtaceae Fortnight: Combretaceae member for identification from Hamirpur (H.P.)

Yes no doubt, it's Combretum nanum. Stunted, procumbent, glabrous undershrub. Leaves opposite, sometimes alternate, broadly obovate to ovate lanceolate. Distribution; outer Himalaya, from Garhwal to Sikkim and in C.India as per Flora of Garhwal NH Himalaya by RD Gaur sir . On Mon, Jun 14, 2021,

Re: [efloraofindia:388786] Crassulaceae, Combretaceae and Myrtaceae Fortnight: Combretaceae member for identification from Hamirpur (H.P.)

Thanks a lot, Tapas ji. On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 21:56, Tapas Chakrabarty wrote: > Yes, I agree. > > On Mon, 14 Jun 2021, 21:54 J.M. Garg, wrote: > >> I think this may also be *Combretum nanum* as per discussions at Id >> confirmation Combretum nanum >>

Re: [efloraofindia:388785] Crassulaceae, Combretaceae and Myrtaceae Fortnight: Combretaceae member for identification from Hamirpur (H.P.)

Yes, I agree. On Mon, 14 Jun 2021, 21:54 J.M. Garg, wrote: > I think this may also be *Combretum nanum* as per discussions at Id > confirmation Combretum nanum > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: J.M. Garg > Date: Mon,

Re: [efloraofindia:388783] Re: Cersatium fontanum var. triviale from Kashmir

Yes Tabish Ji ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 4:12 PM Tabish wrote: > In fact, now *Cerastium fontanum* subsp. *triviale* (E.H.L.Krause) Jalas > > is considered a synonym of* Cerastium glomeratum*

Re: [efloraofindia:388782] Re: Lonicera japonica

I guess you are right Mr. Garg. Matches with images from efi. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 9:57 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it is closer to Lonicera quinquelocularis > than > Lonicera > japonica

Re: [efloraofindia:388781] Fwd: Request for ID Hp Flora

I guess it is matching : Lactuca dolichophylla ! Thank you. Saroj

Re: [efloraofindia:388780] Re: Lonicera japonica

I think it is closer to Lonicera quinquelocularis than Lonicera japonica , as per images and details therein. On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 at 17:27, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Yes

Re: [efloraofindia:388778] Fwd: Cultivated spp. ??: I'd confirm pls

Yes , cultivated variety ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 5:08 PM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Lactuca sativa ? > > Group

Re: [efloraofindia:388778] Fwd: Asteraceae Fortnight Part 3-Ligulate Heads: Lactuca serriola for validation from Panipat-NS 9

Looks matching Species Lactuca serriola L. ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 5:12 PM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Lactuca serriola ? >

Re: [efloraofindia:388777] Swamy/New series/ID/25- ID of the plant

I guess ID is correct ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 5:45 PM M Swamy wrote: > Dear members, > Plant photographed near my house in Mysore last week. The plant *is * > procumbent > to ascending; mat forming habit often rooting at nodes. Leaves less than > 3 cm, pale

Re: [efloraofindia:388775] Tree for identification_Navelim_Goa

Ficus sp. ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 7:25 PM Neha Singh wrote: > Please help in the id of this tree observed at Goa, growing in the wild. > > Tree height- appx 50 feet. > Area of observation-Navelim, Goa > Observed in June 2021 > > (Apologies for the bad pics.Will try

Re: [efloraofindia:388775] Fwd: Asteraceae Week (Part I - Radiate heads) ::Cicerbita sp?? from Manali :: PKA11:

Any opinion on my earlier suggestion : Melanoseris cyanea (D.Don) Edgew. ?? Melanoseris cyanea Edgew. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 8:52 PM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as

Re: [efloraofindia:388774] VOF Week: Lactuca like flowers at Vasundhara Falls

Lactuca dissecta ?? Forestrypedia

[efloraofindia:388773] Re: SK1187 09 JUNE 2018

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Lactuca species ?- Sukhiapokahari, West Bengal Group discussion at SK1187 09 JUNE 2018 (google.com)

Re: [efloraofindia:388771] Asteraceae Week (Part I - Radiate heads) ::Cicerbita sp?? from Manali :: PKA11:

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Lactuca species ?- Chikka in Manali region Group discussion at Asteraceae Week (Part I - Radiate heads) ::Cicerbita

Re: [efloraofindia:388768] Cerastium fontanum

Dear Garg Ji Thank you for this information Regards > On 13-Jun-2021, at 21:39, J.M. Garg wrote: > >  > I think it will be Cerastium glomeratum as per discussions at Confusion > between Cerastium fontanum subsp. vulgare and Cerastium glomeratum and Id > request for this species of Arenaria

Re: [efloraofindia:388766] Fwd: Fw: Lactuca hastata ?

I have earlier suggested Melanoseris cyanea (D.Don) Edgew. ?? Melanoseris cyanea Edgew Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 6:47 PM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > The two are synonyms, I think both leaf base and

Re: [efloraofindia:388765] Re: Fw: Lactuca hastata ?

The two are synonyms, I think both leaf base and winged petiole match with Melanoseris cyanea (D Don) Edgew (syn: Lactuca hastata DC., Cicerbita cyanea (D Don) Beauv.) Group discussion at Fwd: Fw: Lactuca hastata ? (google.com) -- You

Re: [efloraofindia:388762] VOF Week: Lactuca like flowers at Vasundhara Falls

Or may be none of the two if we look at hispid involucre On Monday, June 14, 2021 at 5:39:11 PM UTC+5:30 Gurcharan Singh wrote: > i don't think L. dissecta in which terminal leaf segment would be much > shorter, almost as long as broad > Here it is much monger than broad, Cicerbita macrorhiza

Re: [efloraofindia:388760] VOF Week: Lactuca like flowers at Vasundhara Falls

i don't think L. dissecta in which terminal leaf segment would be much shorter, almost as long as broad Here it is much monger than broad, Cicerbita macrorhiza seems better fit On Monday, December 28, 2020 at 10:25:10 PM UTC+5:30 paradesia...@gmail.com wrote: >  Saroj ji. > > On Mon, 28 Dec

Re: [efloraofindia:388757] RV 16032020 - 2

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Lactuca species ?- Tal Laiyari, Near Nakhatrana, Bhuj, Gujrat Group discussion at RV 16032020 - 2 (google.com)

Re: [efloraofindia:388755] 200320 SD 03

Forwarding again for ID Distributed as Lactuca species ?- Aravalli biodiversity park, Gurgaon Group discussion at 200320 SD 03 (google.com)

Re: [efloraofindia:388753] Asteraceae Fortnight Part 3-Ligulate Heads: Lactuca serriola for validation from Panipat-NS 9

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Lactuca serriola ? I think yes it is Group discussion at Asteraceae Fortnight Part 3-Ligulate Heads: Lactuca serriola for validation from

Re: [efloraofindia:388751] Cultivated spp. ??: I'd confirm pls

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Lactuca sativa ? Group discussion at Cultivated spp. ??: I'd confirm pls (google.com)

[efloraofindia:388748] Re: [indiantreepix:20207] Request for ID Hp Flora

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Lactuca dolichophylla ? Group discussion at Request for ID Hp Flora (google.com)

[efloraofindia:388746] Re: Cersatium fontanum var. triviale from Kashmir

In fact, now *Cerastium fontanum* subsp. *triviale* (E.H.L.Krause) Jalas is considered a synonym of* Cerastium glomeratum* Thuill. Tabish On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 9:44:24 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > I think

Re: [efloraofindia:388744] Lanceleaf Water Plantain ( Alisma lanceolatum)

I think *Alisma plantago-aquatica* rather than *Alisma lanceolatum* , as per images and details herein. On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 at 20:19, Shakir ahmad (Ammatuer Taxonomist) <

[efloraofindia:388743] Re: Cerastium fontanum in FOI

Thanks Garg ji! Yes, it is very much *Cerastium glomeratum*. Tabish --- www.flowersofindia.net The waterhole of flower lovers On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 9:53 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Hi, Tabish ji, > Images of Narendra ji

Fwd: [efloraofindia:388742] Re: SYMBIOSIS : 829

-- Forwarded message - From: Rajmohana K Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 13:52 Subject: [efloraofindia:388741] Re: SYMBIOSIS : 829 To: efloraofindia Do you have any recent observations on insects or birds visiting bakul flowers? On Friday, July 22, 2016 at 7:08:49 PM UTC+5:30

[efloraofindia:388741] Re: SYMBIOSIS : 829

Do you have any recent observations on insects or birds visiting bakul flowers? On Friday, July 22, 2016 at 7:08:49 PM UTC+5:30 bimal.cob wrote: > Dear Friend, > Other day I captured an image of a juvenile male of > Scarlet Sunbird on the flowers of Mimusops elengi (

Re: [efloraofindia:388738] Cerastium fontanum

Dear Garg ji thank you for this correction regards On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 9:39 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it will be *Cerastium glomeratum* as per discussions at Confusion > between Cerastium fontanum subsp. vulgare and Cerastium glomeratum >