Re: [efloraofindia:389310] Re: Identification required.- Location: Kulgam j & k.

Going through the images in efi site I still fill this should be *Vincetoxicum hirundinaria* Medik. ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 10:27 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Shakir Ahmad (Amateur Taxonomist) > Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 at

Re: [efloraofindia:389309] I'd requested 26

Seems to Violaceae, With regards. [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack 06/20/21, 11:22:43 AM On Sun, 20 Jun

Re: [efloraofindia:389308] Re: Nandina domestica Thunb.

Thank you Mahadeswara Ji ! Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 10:34 AM Mahadeswara wrote: > Wonderful presentation ! Superb exhibition of all the parts of the plant. > > On Saturday, June 19, 2021 at 6:31:33 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > >> >> >> >> *Dear Members,Location:

Re: [efloraofindia:389307] I'd requested 1

No sir Regards, Seema Bin Zeenat M.sc Botany Department of Botany, School of Biosciences and Biotechnology. BGSB University, Rajouri- 185234, J, India On Sun, Jun 20, 2021, 10:54 AM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Any more information ma'am, > With Regards. > > > >

Re: [efloraofindia:389306] I'd requested 1

Any more information ma'am, With Regards. [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack 06/20/21, 10:49:53 AM On Mon, 14

Re: [efloraofindia:389306] Re: Asteraceae Fortnight Part 3-Ligulate Heads: Launaea? from VOF for id -NS 14

This is no *Launaea acaulis*, neither any usual *Launaea* spp. Here the phyllaries are 2-seriate, each set having phyllary of equal size, I am yet to find that character in *Launaea*. Unfortunately, there is no herbarium of *L. microcephala*, neither any description except in Flora of British

Re: [efloraofindia:389304] MS, June, 2021/08 Ficus sp. for id.

Ficus nervosa, With regards. [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack 06/20/21, 10:45:58 AM On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at

Re: [efloraofindia:389304] identification of aquatic plant no. 140621sn1

Thanks Satish Ji. Regards Satish Nikam On Saturday, June 19, 2021 at 11:39:02 AM UTC+5:30 paradesia...@gmail.com wrote: > Glinus only, > Glinus oppositifolius, > With regards. > > > > > [image: Mailtrack] >

[efloraofindia:389303] Re: Identification required.- Help me to identify this herb

Thanks everyone. Regards Satish Nikam On Sunday, June 20, 2021 at 7:20:10 AM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > This is Marsilea minuta, a common plant of damp fields, rice-fields, and > ponds. To confirm the identity you need to show the sorocarps, which are > borne on the lower-growing, smaller,

Re: [efloraofindia:389301] Re: ASTERACEAE Fortnight Part 3-Ligulate Heads: Launaea acaulis for validation from Uttarakhand_DSR_14

Sir, I thought, since those were spread unevenly and no hair was visible, those were some kind of pest, or mold (mould), if mould grows on living tissue, at that altitude or temperature! If those are glands it would not be a minor concern, Sir, I am yet to come across (in literature) any

[efloraofindia:389299] Fwd: Identification required.- Help me to identify this herb

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Shakir Ahmad (Amateur Taxonomist) Date: Sun, 20 Jun, 2021, 8:52 am Subject: Re: Identification required.- Help me to identify this herb To: J.M. Garg I will try to get sorocarps of possible Regards, Shakir Ahmad. M.sc

Re: [efloraofindia:389299] Orchid

Hi, Manjunath ji, No images attached. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sat, 19 Jun, 2021, 9:00 pm Manjunath b manju, wrote: > Hi sir, i am Manjunath B. From Chikmangalore I am specially interested > in Orchid Plants can I have a identity please > > On Sat, 19 Jun 2021, 8:25 pm Paradesi

[efloraofindia:389298] Re: Nandina domestica Thunb.

Wonderful presentation ! Superb exhibition of all the parts of the plant. On Saturday, June 19, 2021 at 6:31:33 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > > > > *Dear Members,Location: Kathmandu, Central NepalAltitude: 1400 m.Date : 19 > June 2021Habitat : Cultivated* > Thank you. > > Saroj

[efloraofindia:389297] Re: Orchid

Send the request in a separate post. Donot link to this. Give a request ID number for each post. On Saturday, June 19, 2021 at 9:00:39 PM UTC+5:30 bmanju...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi sir, i am Manjunath B. From Chikmangalore I am specially interested > in Orchid Plants can I have a identity

[efloraofindia:389296] Re: 95 ID wild plant white C. Benghalensis

Awesome upload of the plant parts to exhibit all the important characters ! Well done ! I checked with comparative images in the net and description. For me your ID looks o.k. White ones are rare. On Sunday, June 20, 2021 at 12:25:59 AM UTC+5:30 samkuzh...@gmail.com wrote: > Sharing more

Re: [efloraofindia:389294] Morning Glory for ID : California : 10JUN21 : AK-04

Thanks Aarti ji. Hope the ID gets validated by other members. On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 8:06 AM Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Thanks Mahadeswara ji. > Regards, > Aarti > > On Sat, 19 Jun 2021, 17:46 Mahadeswara, wrote: > >> Images tally with* Ipomoea indica* (Burm.) Merr as per this link : >>

Re: [efloraofindia:389293] Morning Glory for ID : California : 10JUN21 : AK-04

Thanks Mahadeswara ji. Regards, Aarti On Sat, 19 Jun 2021, 17:46 Mahadeswara, wrote: > Images tally with* Ipomoea indica* (Burm.) Merr as per this link : > https://keys.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/eafrinet/weeds/key/weeds/Media/Html/Ipomoea_indica_(Blue_Morning_Glory).htm > > On Saturday, June

[efloraofindia:389292] Re: Identification required.- Help me to identify this herb

This is Marsilea minuta, a common plant of damp fields, rice-fields, and ponds. To confirm the identity you need to show the sorocarps, which are borne on the lower-growing, smaller, non-aquatic plants, But it is no problem as only M. minuta is in northern India, including J. & K.. In the

Re: [efloraofindia:389289] Re: ASTERACEAE Fortnight Part 3-Ligulate Heads: Launaea acaulis for validation from Uttarakhand_DSR_14

Thank you Suraji Ji. *Launaea nudicaulis* (L.) Hook.f. is certainly a better match. A minor concern here is of the glandular hair on outer phyllaries which are not mentioned in L. nudicaulis. However, I am taking it as *L. nudicaulis* (L.) Hook.f. DSRawat Pantnagar On Saturday, June 19, 2021

Re: [efloraofindia:389287] ID requested: Unid Climber/Liana (Sigur forests, Nilgiris, TN)

Thanks, Gargji! *HARIKRISHNAN Venugopalan Radhamoni* *Everything will again be great and mighty The land simple and the water bountiful The trees gigantic and the walls very small And in the valleys strong and multiformed, A nation of shepherds and peasant farmers~Rilke* On

Fwd: [efloraofindia:389286] Re: Identification required.- Location: Kulgam j & k.

-- Forwarded message - From: Shakir Ahmad (Amateur Taxonomist) Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 at 22:07 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:388567] Re: Identification required.- Location: Kulgam j & k. To: J.M. Garg Sure sir.. I will. Send. Regards, Shakir Ahmad. M.sc Botany. Department of

Re: [efloraofindia:389284] Re: Identification required.- Location: Kulgam j & k.

Corolla lobes are not clearly focussed in the images, but I see some hairs. It may be Vincetoxicum canescens . Hi, Shakir ji, May I request you to pl. post a clear image showing the corolla lobes and an image showing its calyx. On Fri,

Re: [efloraofindia:389282] Re: SK1187 09 JUNE 2018

Perhaps this is your plant - http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77175234-1 Thank you With regards surajit koley On Sat, 19 Jun 2021 at 21:04, surajit koley wrote: > Saroj ji, please check probability of another one (6 ft height), (*Lactuca > graciliflora* DC. of FBI) >

Re: [efloraofindia:389281] Re: SK1187 09 JUNE 2018

Saroj ji, please check probability of another one (6 ft height), (*Lactuca graciliflora* DC. of FBI) 1. http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77117990-1 2. https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=7744558 3.

Re: [efloraofindia:389275] Re: Nandina domestica Thunb.

Nice set of information Saroj Ji, With regards. [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack 06/19/21, 07:26:52 PM On

[efloraofindia:389265] Re: Opuntia

Opuntia humifus sps ??? On Saturday, June 19, 2021 at 4:24:14 PM UTC+5:30 dpr61 wrote: > Dear Sirs > This is from Salem Tamilnadu > Kindly identify the species > Thank you > Yours faithfully > Digpati Roy > > > > > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android >

[efloraofindia:389264] Re: Palm from Kerala[Wayanad]

Please send the photograph of the leaves (individual) . On Saturday, June 19, 2021 at 4:26:37 PM UTC+5:30 dpr61 wrote: > Dear Sirs > Kindly identify the species > Thank you > Yours faithfully > Digpati Roy > > > > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android >

[efloraofindia:389263] Re: SK 2911 19 June 2021

Fuchsia sps. With innumerable varieties / hybrids it is difficult pinpoint the sps. On Saturday, June 19, 2021 at 4:29:42 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > Location: Leh, Ladakh > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 4:09 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Dear Members,

Re: [efloraofindia:389261] Re: SK1187 09 JUNE 2018

Sir ji, I suggest please keep it that way, for it will have its own room in eFI ! In future if more information can be obtained from other sources, or you happen to find this again and can be identified properly, it will be moved to a more furnished room! Thank you With regards surajit koley On

Re: [efloraofindia:389260] Re: ASTERACEAE Fortnight Part 3-Ligulate Heads: Launaea acaulis for validation from Uttarakhand_DSR_14

It is most probably *Launaea nudicaulis* (L.) Hook.f. - http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:229036-1 Thank you With regards surajit koley On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 21:31, surajitno...@gmail.com < surajitnotavaila...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, missed the main point, it has

Re: [efloraofindia:389258] Re: Amaranthus viridis L.

Tasty vegetable. Thank you Mahadeswara JI ! Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 5:49 PM Mahadeswara wrote: > Yes Saroj ji. It is a weed in my garden. Plenty > > On Saturday, June 19, 2021 at 3:55:24 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > >> >> Thank you Paradesi Ji ! >> >> Saroj Kasaju >>

[efloraofindia:389258] Re: SK41JUL21-2016:ID

Does not look like *Salsola tragus . *No spines ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 9:30 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Thank you Dr. Dvorsky ! > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 6:26 PM, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks a lot, Miroslav ji. >> >> --

Re: [efloraofindia:389258] Morning Glory for ID : California : 10JUN21 : AK-04

Images tally with* Ipomoea indica* (Burm.) Merr as per this link : https://keys.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/eafrinet/weeds/key/weeds/Media/Html/Ipomoea_indica_(Blue_Morning_Glory).htm On Saturday, June 19, 2021 at 8:06:43 AM UTC+5:30 Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Garg Ji, > Thanks for forwarding. >

Re: [efloraofindia:389257] Re: Amaranthus viridis L.

Yes Saroj ji. It is a weed in my garden. Plenty On Saturday, June 19, 2021 at 3:55:24 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you Paradesi Ji ! > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 4:08 PM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < > paradesia...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes, it's, >> With regards.

Fwd: [efloraofindia:389254] Re: Ranunculaceae Week

Delphinium and Clematis should be separated to respective threads ! Thank you Saroj Kasaju -- Forwarded message - From: Saroj Kumar Kasaju Date: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 at 5:26:24 PM UTC+5:45 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:253617] Re: Ranunculaceae Week To: efloraofindia Looks

Re: [efloraofindia:389253] Re: SK983 17 FEB-2018

Thanks Garg ji & Saroj ji for confirming my ID suggestion. On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 9:22 AM Mahadeswara wrote: > > Please check for Gaillardia species. > > On Saturday, February 17, 2018 at 10:41:59 PM UTC+5:30, Saroj Kumar Kasaju > wrote: >> >> Dear Members, >> >> Location : Leh, India >> >>

[efloraofindia:389249] Re: SK 2911 19 June 2021

Location: Leh, Ladakh Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 4:09 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Dear Members, > > Location: Kathmandu, Central Nepal > Altitude: 3300 m. > Date : 19 August 2014 > Habitat : Cultivated > Fuchsia ‘Campopple’ ?? > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > -- You

Re: [efloraofindia:389246] Shrub 2_Goa _for identification

Yes it's Ziziphus rugosa, With regards. [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack 06/19/21, 04:06:06 PM On Fri, 18

Re: [efloraofindia:389246] Shrub for Id_Goa Flora

I too agree with Microcos paniculata, With regards. [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack 06/19/21, 04:04:46 PM

Re: [efloraofindia:389245] Moraceae shrub for identification SN 16March 03

I think you're Sunit Ji, I agree with you for ID, With regards. [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack 06/19/21,

Re: [efloraofindia:389242] Re: Ajuga reptans L.

Thank you Paradesi Ji ! Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 4:07 PM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nice Saroj Ji, > With regards. > > > > > [image: Mailtrack] > > Sender >

Re: [efloraofindia:389242] Re: Amaranthus viridis L.

Thank you Paradesi Ji ! Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 4:08 PM Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, it's, > With regards. > > > > [image: Mailtrack] > > Sender > notified

Re: [efloraofindia:389242] Tree for Id_Forests of Goa

Yes, it's Viplav Ji, you're right, With regards. [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack 06/19/21, 03:54:17 PM On

Re: [efloraofindia:389239] Re: Amaranthus viridis L.

Yes, it's, With regards. [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack 06/19/21, 03:52:38 PM On Sat, 19 Jun 2021 at

Re: [efloraofindia:389239] Re: Ajuga reptans L.

Nice Saroj Ji, With regards. [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack 06/19/21, 03:51:34 PM On Sat, 19 Jun 2021 at

Re: [efloraofindia:389238] Fwd: Which is this flower?

Agree Mr. Garg ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 3:57 PM JM Garg wrote: > I think Potentilla nepalensis > as per > images and details herein. > Looks different from images and details at Potentilla atrosanguinea

Re: [efloraofindia:389237] Potential sp.

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 3:55 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think Potentilla nepalensis > as per > images and details herein. > Looks different from images and details at Potentilla atrosanguinea var. >

Re: [efloraofindia:389235] Potential sp.

I think Potentilla nepalensis as per images and details herein. Looks different from images and details at Potentilla atrosanguinea var. atrosanguinea On Fri, 11 Jun 2021

Re: [efloraofindia:389233] Fwd: Saussurea sp. from Paddar valley J 04

Pl. see leaves in Saussurea gnaphalodes , they look different. On Sat, 19 Jun 2021 at 15:28, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > I shall go for *Saussurea gnaphalodes *(Royle) Sch.Bip. ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at

Re: [efloraofindia:389233] Saussurea sp. from Paddar valley J 03

Pl. see leaves in Saussurea gnaphalodes , they look different. On Sat, 19 Jun 2021 at 15:27, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > This is S. gnaphalodes ! Please see hairy spongy leaves in S.glacialis ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sat,

Re: [efloraofindia:389231] Fwd: Saussurea sp. from Paddar valley J 04

I shall go for *Saussurea gnaphalodes *(Royle) Sch.Bip. ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 3:34 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it may be S.glacialis > only as per > other observations herein, from the same place. > > On

Re: [efloraofindia:389231] Saussurea sp. from Paddar valley J 03

This is S. gnaphalodes ! Please see hairy spongy leaves in S.glacialis ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 3:36 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it may be S.glacialis > only as per > other observations herein, from the

Re: [efloraofindia:389228] Fwd: Saussurea sp. from Paddar valley J 04

I think it may be S.glacialis only as per other observations herein, from the same place. On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 18:24, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > *Saussurea gnaphalodes *(Royle) Sch.Bip. > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Jun 11,

[efloraofindia:389206] Re: id request of attached link.

Thanks a lot to all of you. On Sat, Jun 19, 2021, 1:35 PM Dr. Anil Kumar Thakur < anilthakur2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, Sunit > Your specimen is F. sarmentosa > > On Sat, 19 Jun 2021, 12:43 pm Sunit Singh, > wrote: > >> Thanks a lot, sir, attaching images of F. sarmentosa. >> >> >> *Thanks &

[efloraofindia:389205] Re: id request of attached link.

Yes, Sunit Your specimen is F. sarmentosa On Sat, 19 Jun 2021, 12:43 pm Sunit Singh, wrote: > Thanks a lot, sir, attaching images of F. sarmentosa. > > > *Thanks & Regards* > Sunit Singh > Ph.D. Research Scholar > Department of Botany > HNB Central University Garhwal Uttarakhand. > > > On Sat,

Re: [efloraofindia:389204] Tree for Id_Forests of Goa

It reminds me of *Carallia brachiata* (Lour.) Merr. [*Rhizophoraceae*]. Best wishes, Viplav On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 22:49, Neha Singh wrote: > Tree height- 70-80 feet > No fruits or flowers were observed. > Observed in the forest area of North Goa. > Can this tree be identified? > Plz help. > >

Re: [efloraofindia:389203] Fwd: Asteraceae Fortnight Part 2-Discoid heads:: Plant for ID SMP 23 Pangot

This may also be Cirsium wallichii as per A plant for i.d. On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 21:36, J.M. Garg wrote: > Appears more closer to images at Cirsium verutum >

Re: [efloraofindia:389202] Re: SK1187 09 JUNE 2018

Looks according to the keys! Thank you Surajit Ji ! Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 11:20 AM surajit koley < surajitnotavaila...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, Sir, forgot to attach FBI entry. > > Thank you > With regards > surajit koley > > > On Sat, 19 Jun 2021 at 11:03, surajit koley >

Re: [efloraofindia:389201] Re: id request of attached link.

Yes Anil Ji ! First thread looks like F. sarmentosa. Needs validation from expert ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 12:40 PM Dr. Anil Kumar Thakur < anilthakur2...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is mixing of two species in this thread. > > Regards > > On Sat, 19 Jun 2021, 10:46 am

[efloraofindia:389199] Re: id request of attached link.

Yes, I will correct it. On Sat, 19 Jun 2021 at 12:25, Dr. Anil Kumar Thakur < anilthakur2...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is mixing of two species in this thread. > > Regards > > On Sat, 19 Jun 2021, 10:46 am Sunit Singh, > wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021, 12:07 PM Sunit Singh >> wrote: >>

[efloraofindia:389198] Re: id request of attached link.

There is mixing of two species in this thread. Regards On Sat, 19 Jun 2021, 10:46 am Sunit Singh, wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021, 12:07 PM Sunit Singh > wrote: > >> Dear sir good afternoon, please check the *attached link*. >> >>

Re: [efloraofindia:389197] identification of aquatic plant no. 140621sn1

Glinus only, Glinus oppositifolius, With regards. [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack 06/19/21, 11:38:05 AM