[efloraofindia:444077] Re: SK 3698 12 March 2023

Thank you Paradesi ji ! Saroj Kasaju On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 at 11:32 am, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, tapas ji. > It has been identified as > > *Euonymus lucidus *D.Don syn : *Euonymus pendulus *Wall. > > On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 at 01:28, Tapas Chakrabarty > wrote: > >> Should be Cryptocarya, possibly

[efloraofindia:444077] Re: Regarding id of the Species Date of Photograph Sept.2022/Khurda Odisha

Thanks, Lalithamba ji On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 at 07:54, Lalithamba Avadhanam wrote: > thank you, could it be Drypetes subsessilis, because, both male and female > flowers clustered; (In Drypetes assamica female flowers solitary, stigma > different:) here *Pistillate flowers*: sepals orbicular,

[efloraofindia:444076] Re: SK 3698 12 March 2023

Thanks, tapas ji. It has been identified as *Euonymus lucidus *D.Don syn : *Euonymus pendulus *Wall. On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 at 01:28, Tapas Chakrabarty wrote: > Should be Cryptocarya, possibly C. amygdalina. > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023, 14:59 J.M. Garg, wrote: > >> Forwarding again for Id assistance

Re: [efloraofindia:444075] Re: Tree for ID- 020323AK1

Thanks Paradesi ji. Undulate yes, but I've never seen serrate margins! regards Radha On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 8:27:28 PM UTC-6 Paradesi Anjaneyulu wrote: > In Miliusa we will observe slight serrate-undulate ma'am, that's clearly > visible in matured leaves only than Juvenile. > [image:

[efloraofindia:444073] Re: Regarding id of the Species Date of Photograph Sept.2022/Khurda Odisha

thank you, could it be Drypetes subsessilis, because, both male and female flowers clustered; (In Drypetes assamica female flowers solitary, stigma different:) here *Pistillate flowers*: sepals orbicular, concave; ovary pubescent, 2- or 3-locular, stigmas 2 or 3, *obtriangular*. there is a record

Re: [efloraofindia:444072] Re: Tree for ID- 020323AK1

Paradesi ji, do we get serrate margins on Miliusa leaves? regards Radha On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 7:55:36 PM UTC-6 Paradesi Anjaneyulu wrote: > Miliusa tomentosa > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 15:01, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 17:26, J.M. Garg wrote: >> >>> Any other

Re: [efloraofindia:444072] Tree ID from Hastinapur Wildlife Sanctuary

That's true. Some of the leaves are slightly serrate/crenate on the margins so not sure about Miliusa. regards Radha On Thursday, March 16, 2023 at 7:51:48 PM UTC-6 Paradesi Anjaneyulu wrote: > Miliusa tomentosa > > > Casearia graveolens leaves are glabrous. > > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at

Re: [efloraofindia:444070] Re: Tree for ID- 020323AK1

Miliusa tomentosa On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 15:01, J.M. Garg wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 17:26, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Any other images. Arvind ji? >> >> On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 13:13, J.M. Garg wrote: >> >>> Forwarding again for Id assistance please. >>> >>> -- Forwarded message

Re: [efloraofindia:444069] Tree ID from Hastinapur Wildlife Sanctuary

Miliusa tomentosa Casearia graveolens leaves are glabrous. On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 17:22, J.M. Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: J.M. Garg > Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 11:48 > Subject: Fwd: [efloraofindia:443485] Tree

Re: [efloraofindia:444068] Re: Regarding the Id Of the Species 030323PKD1

Prabath JI Go with Cordia macleodii. On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 17:31, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, Lalithamba ji > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 17:30, Lalithamba Avadhanam > wrote: > >> But it is not matching with the description given in FPM by Gamble. let >> us wait, till fruit >> >> On Thu,

Re: [efloraofindia:444067] Re: Picture of tree leaf- 2

Wrightia sp. only Close to Wrightia arborea. On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 20:01, radha veach wrote: > Thank you Garg ji! > Regards > Radha > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023, 03:52 J.M. Garg, wrote: > >> Thanks, Radha ji. >> On further checking, seems to agree with you as per images at >>

Re: [efloraofindia:444066] Re: SK 3698 12 March 2023

I too agree with Gopal sir, For Euonymus. On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 at 05:11, Kumar Prabhat Das wrote: > Respected sir  > C. amygdalina leaf does not have serate leaves, but this species does. > > > On Fri, 17 Mar, 2023, 1:28 am Tapas Chakrabarty, > wrote: > >> Should be Cryptocarya, possibly C.

Re: [efloraofindia:444065] Re: SK 3698 12 March 2023

Respected sir  C. amygdalina leaf does not have serate leaves, but this species does. On Fri, 17 Mar, 2023, 1:28 am Tapas Chakrabarty, wrote: > Should be Cryptocarya, possibly C. amygdalina. > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023, 14:59 J.M. Garg, wrote: > >> Forwarding again for Id assistance please. >>

[efloraofindia:444064] Re: SK 3698 12 March 2023

Should be Cryptocarya, possibly C. amygdalina. On Thu, 16 Mar 2023, 14:59 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > Seems to be Xylosma sp.- from Prabhat ji > *Xylosma controversa *Clos ?? But leaf margin serration looks different. >

[efloraofindia:444063] Re: Regarding id of the Species Date of Photograph Sept.2022/Khurda Odisha

Thank you Sir ji for your response and guidance On Thu, 16 Mar, 2023, 9:44 pm navendu page, wrote: > Thank you for sharing the images. Your plant is definitely Drypetes. I am > also quite sure that the images by Das Ji are female flowers of Drypetes. > > Regards > Navendu > > On Thu, 16 Mar

Re: [efloraofindia:444062] Fwd: Re[2]: Fwd: Spinacia oleracea L.

Thank you Dr. Sukhrukov for the validation ! Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 10:04 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Alexander P. Sukhorukov > Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 at 13:54 > Subject: Re[2]: Fwd: Spinacia oleracea L. > To: J.M. Garg > Cc: Saroj

Re: [efloraofindia:444061] 429 ID wild tree

Yes, it is *Strobocalyx* *arborea*, dear Garg ji, thank you very much for ID my tree, with kind regards, Sam. On Thu, 16 Mar 2023, 3:36 pm J.M. Garg, wrote: > To me appears close to images at > https://efloraofindia.com/2011/04/05/vernonia-arborea/ > > On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 14:35, Sam

[efloraofindia:444058] Fwd: Re[2]: Fwd: Spinacia oleracea L.

-- Forwarded message - From: Alexander P. Sukhorukov Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 at 13:54 Subject: Re[2]: Fwd: Spinacia oleracea L. To: J.M. Garg Cc: Saroj Kasaju , DineshValke < dinesh.va...@gmail.com>, Tabish these spiny structures are bracts enclosing each female flower and

[efloraofindia:444058] Fwd: Fwd: Spinacia oleracea L.

-- Forwarded message - From: J.M. Garg Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 at 13:45 Subject: Re: Fwd: Spinacia oleracea L. To: Alexander P. Sukhorukov Cc: Saroj Kasaju , DineshValke < dinesh.va...@gmail.com>, Tabish Thanks, Alexander ji, What are these spine-like structures at the base of

[efloraofindia:444058] Fwd: Fwd: Spinacia oleracea L.

-- Forwarded message - From: Alexander P. Sukhorukov Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 at 12:39 Subject: Re: Fwd: Spinacia oleracea L. To: J.M. Garg Cc: Saroj Kasaju , DineshValke < dinesh.va...@gmail.com>, Tabish Dear all Ji, This is really Spinacia oleralea (left plant, right is

[efloraofindia:444057] Re: Regarding id of the Species Date of Photograph Sept.2022/Khurda Odisha

Thank you for sharing the images. Your plant is definitely Drypetes. I am also quite sure that the images by Das Ji are female flowers of Drypetes. Regards Navendu On Thu, 16 Mar 2023, 07:31 Lalithamba Avadhanam, wrote: > floral branch not collected. thank you for making me to re-examine. > >

Re: [efloraofindia:444056] Re: Picture of tree leaf- 2

Thank you Garg ji! Regards Radha On Thu, 16 Mar 2023, 03:52 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks, Radha ji. > On further checking, seems to agree with you as per images at > https://efloraofindia.com/2011/04/01/terminalia-chebula/ > > > On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 21:55, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> OK. Will do a

[efloraofindia:444055] Re: Gentiana albicalyx??

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 5:48 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Ok, Saroj ji. > Still not sure. > > On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 12:08, Saroj Kumar Kasaju > wrote: > >> I guess the ID is correct ! >> https://www.gbif.org/species/7270577 >> Thank you >> Saroj Kasaju >> >>

[efloraofindia:444052] Re: Gentiana albicalyx??

Ok, Saroj ji. Still not sure. On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 12:08, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > I guess the ID is correct ! > https://www.gbif.org/species/7270577 > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Gurcharan Singh > Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 at

Re: [efloraofindia:444052] Fwd: Regarding identification of the species collected from Dhenkanal Odisha , Aug 2022

All database links says *Epithema zeylanicum *Gardner except for the POWO ! Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 5:40 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Wonderful images and equally wonderful id. > Yes, matches as per images at >

Re: [efloraofindia:444052] Re: Regarding the Id Of the Species 030323PKD1

Thanks a lot, Lalithamba ji On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 17:30, Lalithamba Avadhanam wrote: > But it is not matching with the description given in FPM by Gamble. let us > wait, till fruit > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 1:47 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> So I keep it as *Cordia perrottetii* >> >> On Tue, 14

Re: [efloraofindia:444051] Fwd: Regarding identification of the species collected from Dhenkanal Odisha , Aug 2022

Wonderful images and equally wonderful id. Yes, matches as per images at https://efloraofindia.com/2022/01/06/epithema-ceylanicum/ On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 20:13, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Epithema zeylanicum Gardner ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 5:31 PM J.M. Garg

Re: [efloraofindia:444049] Kas Week :: DV :: 19 OCT 07 - 1120 :: Solanum lasiocarpum

solanaceaesource gives quite a detailed inf. Pl. check with this also and confirm. As per this: Deb (1979) relegated *S. hovei* to the synonymy of the widespread and highly variable *Solanum violaceum* (as *S. indicum*).

[efloraofindia:444047] Re: SK 3698 12 March 2023

Thank you Rawat Sir ! Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 4:46 PM GOPAL SINGH Rawat wrote: > Yes, E. pendulus. > > Best, > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 4:11 PM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> Thank you Rawat sir, >> >> Leaves are rather glossy and the elevation does not match as well. >> Could

[efloraofindia:444047] Re: SK 3698 12 March 2023

Yes, E. pendulus. Best, On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 4:11 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you Rawat sir, > > Leaves are rather glossy and the elevation does not match as well. > Could it be *Euonymus lucidus *D.Don syn : *Euonymus pendulus *Wall. > And the location is also similar according to the

[efloraofindia:444046] Re: SK 3698 12 March 2023

Thanks a lot, Rawat ji On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 15:54, GOPAL SINGH Rawat wrote: > May check *Euonymus fimbriatus* > > G S Rawat > --- > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 2:58 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Forwarding again for Id assistance please. >> >> Some earlier relevant feedback: >> Seems to be Xylosma

[efloraofindia:444045] Re: SK 3698 12 March 2023

Thank you Rawat sir, Leaves are rather glossy and the elevation does not match as well. Could it be *Euonymus lucidus *D.Don syn : *Euonymus pendulus *Wall. And the location is also similar according to the herbarium image .

[efloraofindia:444043] Re: SK 3698 12 March 2023

May check *Euonymus fimbriatus* G S Rawat --- On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 2:58 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > Seems to be Xylosma sp.- from Prabhat ji > *Xylosma controversa *Clos ?? But leaf margin serration looks different.

Re: [efloraofindia:444043] Requesting a tree id_01: 140323

India Biodiversity Portal says "Raised in plantations in the High Ranges" On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 15:46, J.M. Garg wrote: > Pl. see Flora of Peninsular India > > . > Also

Re: [efloraofindia:444042] Requesting a tree id_01: 140323

Pl. see Flora of Peninsular India . Also see Robi ji's remarks at ID Request- Munnar-PKA12 On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 15:37, Sachin Bhaskar wrote: > Dear Both, >

Re: [efloraofindia:444040] Requesting a tree id_01: 140323

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 3:26 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, it is (But it is an exotic in the area) as per images at > https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/04/alnus-nepalensis/ > > > On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 19:25, Sachin Bhaskar > wrote: > >> Dear community, >> >>

Re: [efloraofindia:444040] 429 ID wild tree

To me appears close to images at https://efloraofindia.com/2011/04/05/vernonia-arborea/ On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 14:35, Sam Kuzhalanattu wrote: > Please ID wild tree, very close to, but a tree, kind regards, Sam. > > Location: near Adimali, Idukki, Kerala > > Altitude: 1800fsl > > Flower date:

Re: [efloraofindia:444039] Re: Picture of tree leaf- 2

Thanks, Radha ji. On further checking, seems to agree with you as per images at https://efloraofindia.com/2011/04/01/terminalia-chebula/ On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 21:55, J.M. Garg wrote: > OK. Will do a recheck. > > On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 19:33, radha veach wrote: > >> I think it is very likely.

Re: [efloraofindia:444038] Requesting a tree id_01: 140323

Yes, it is (But it is an exotic in the area) as per images at https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/04/alnus-nepalensis/ On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 19:25, Sachin Bhaskar wrote: > Dear community, > > The attached specimen is a tree with alternate leaves and the flowers > (inflorescence, what appears to

[efloraofindia:444037] Re: Tree for ID- 020323AK1

On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 17:26, J.M. Garg wrote: > Any other images. Arvind ji? > > On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 13:13, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Forwarding again for Id assistance please. >> >> -- Forwarded message - >> From: J.M. Garg >> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 at 12:02 >> Subject: Tree

[efloraofindia:444034] Re: SK 3702 14 March 2023

Almost from the same location : http://plantdatabase.kath.gov.np/plants/eriobotrya-elliptica-wall-kath101012 http://plantdatabase.kath.gov.np/plants/eriobotrya-elliptica-wall-kath101011 http://plantdatabase.kath.gov.np/plants/eriobotrya-elliptica-wall-kath101010 Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu,

[efloraofindia:444033] Re: SK 3702 14 March 2023

We have one more sp *Eriobotrya hookeriana *but does not look like fit ! https://www.google.com/url?sa=t=j==s=web==2ahUKEwjv7q7ageD9AhV0WXwKHS2xAE4QFnoECA0QAQ=https%3A%2F%2Fbiodiversity.bt%2Fspecies%2Fshow%2F6265=AOvVaw2nsgZQKe-ibnwge6QBBC7P *.* Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Mar

Re: [efloraofindia:444030] Re: Regarding the Id Of the Species 030323PKD1

So I keep it as *Cordia perrottetii* On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 14:37, J.M. Garg wrote: > Any views? > > On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 13:14, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Yes, this appears to be quite interesting. >> I check species mentioned in the Flora of Peninsular India >>

[efloraofindia:444030] Re: Clinopodium piperitum (D. Don) Press

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 2:02 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Superb presentation. > Yes, as per > https://efloraofindia.com/2019/06/01/clinopodium-piperitum/ > > On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 14:35, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> >> *Dear Members,Location: Kathmandu Valley,

[efloraofindia:444030] Re: Clinopodium piperitum (D. Don) Press

Superb presentation. Yes, as per https://efloraofindia.com/2019/06/01/clinopodium-piperitum/ On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 14:35, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > *Dear Members,Location: Kathmandu Valley, NepalDate: 11 March > 2023Altitude: 2203m.Habitat : Wild * > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > -- With

[efloraofindia:444029] Re: SK 3702 14 March 2023

Going by keys from Flora of Nepal Online account (as below), it should be Eriobotrya elliptica: 1a Twigs glabrous, 2–4 mm thick E. dubia b Twigs tomentose, 5–9 mm thick ... 2 2a

[efloraofindia:444028] Re: Smilax wallichii Kunth

Thank you Mr. Garg Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 1:40 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I will further examine, with the detailed descriptions. > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 13:23, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Saroj ji. >> It says inflorescence single umbel, costate, trinerved for >>

[efloraofindia:444026] Re: Smilax wallichii Kunth

I will further examine, with the detailed descriptions. On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 13:23, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Saroj ji. > It says inflorescence single umbel, costate, trinerved for *S.lanceifolia* > and branched umbel, costate, trinerved or triplinerved for *S.wallichii* > > On Thu, 16 Mar

Re: [efloraofindia:444025] Re: Regarding the Identification of the Lamiacae member collected from Bolangir Odisha On sept 2022

OK Mr. Das ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 1:33 PM Kumar Prabhat Das wrote: > Thank you Sir > > On Thu, 16 Mar, 2023, 12:38 pm Saroj Kasaju, > wrote: > >> ??? >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> -- Forwarded message - >> From: Kumar Prabhat Das >>

Re: [efloraofindia:444024] Re: Regarding the Identification of the Lamiacae member collected from Bolangir Odisha On sept 2022

Thank you Sir On Thu, 16 Mar, 2023, 12:38 pm Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > ??? > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Kumar Prabhat Das > Date: Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:52 PM > Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:444001] Re: Regarding the Identification of > the

[efloraofindia:444020] Re: SK 3701 14 March 2023

Thank you Mr. Garg. I shall follow up for fruiting ! Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:59 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > To me looks different from images at > https://efloraofindia.com/2019/06/16/sabia-campanulata/ > > Pl. check > http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=93357_id=2 > >

[efloraofindia:444019] Re: Smilax wallichii Kunth

Maybe yes. I do not see continuity between these two pages. On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 12:43, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Do you mean by Keys pages ? > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:36 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> But I am not able to relate them s.no. wise. >> >> On Thu, 16

[efloraofindia:444017] Re: SK 3701 14 March 2023

To me looks different from images at https://efloraofindia.com/2019/06/16/sabia-campanulata/ Pl. check http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=93357_id=2 On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 12:37, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > *Dear Members,Location: Kathmandu Valley, NepalDate: 11 March >

[efloraofindia:444017] Re: Smilax wallichii Kunth

Do you mean by Keys pages ? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:36 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > But I am not able to relate them s.no. wise. > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 12:15, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Same book ! >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:24 

[efloraofindia:444016] Re: SK169OCT29-2016:ID

*Equilabium molle *(Aiton) Mwany. & A.J.Paton Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 6:31 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > *Plectranthus mollis *(Aiton) Spreng. (accepted name) > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> Thank you Dr. Rawat/ Mr. Garg for the ID. >> >>

[efloraofindia:444012] Re: Plectranthus mollis (Aiton) Spreng.

*Equilabium molle *(Aiton) Mwany. & A.J.Paton Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 10:44 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Dear Members, > Location: Chobhar, Kathmandu, Nepal > Date: 21 September 2020 > Elevation: 1340m. > Habit: Wild > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > -- You received this

[efloraofindia:444012] Re: Plectranthus mollis (Aiton) Spreng.

*Equilabium molle *(Aiton) Mwany. & A.J.Paton Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 7:35 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you Mr. Garg. > > Saroj Kasaju > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 7:11 pm, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Saroj ji, for the wonderful images >> >> On Sat 10 Nov, 2018,

Fwd: [efloraofindia:444012] Re: Regarding the Identification of the Lamiacae member collected from Bolangir Odisha On sept 2022

??? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju -- Forwarded message - From: Kumar Prabhat Das Date: Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:52 PM Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:444001] Re: Regarding the Identification of the Lamiacae member collected from Bolangir Odisha On sept 2022 To: Prabhat kumar Das

Re: [efloraofindia:444012] Re: Regarding the Identification of the Lamiacae member collected from Bolangir Odisha On sept 2022

Equilabium molle (Aiton) Mwany. & A.J.Paton Syn : *Plectranthus mollis *(Aiton) Spreng. ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:18 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Prabhat ji > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 12:02, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Prabhat ji >> >> On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at

[efloraofindia:444011] Re: SK 3700 13 March 2023

Thanks, Saroj ji. Yes, as per images at https://efloraofindia.com/2014/09/28/senecio-wightii/ For description pl. see Flora of China . On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 12:23, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you Mr. Garg. It may turn out to be

[efloraofindia:444009] Re: Smilax wallichii Kunth

But I am not able to relate them s.no. wise. On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 12:15, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Same book ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:24 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Are these from two different books? >> >> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 12:19, Saroj Kasaju wrote:

[efloraofindia:444009] Re: [itpmods:17799] Fwd: SK 3695 02 March 2023

Thank you Mr. Garg / Dr. Kuriakose Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:30 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, appears close to images at > https://efloraofindia.com/2012/12/14/osmanthus-fragrans/ > > On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 12:19, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J. M. Garg >> >>

[efloraofindia:444007] Re: [itpmods:17799] Fwd: SK 3695 02 March 2023

Yes, appears close to images at https://efloraofindia.com/2012/12/14/osmanthus-fragrans/ On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 12:19, J.M. Garg wrote: > > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Saroj Kasaju > Date: Tue, 14 Mar, 2023, 00:10 > Subject: Re:

[efloraofindia:444007] Re: Smilax wallichii Kunth

Same book ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:24 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Are these from two different books? > > On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 12:19, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 12:33 pm, Saroj Kasaju >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 12:28

[efloraofindia:444005] Re: SK1234 26 JUNE 2018

Yes a lot, Sampath ji On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 09:58, V. Sampath Kumar wrote: > As far as my knowledge the AUBD 31043, is Craniotome sp. > > DR. V. SAMPATH KUMAR > Scientist, > Southern Regional Centre, > Botanical Survey of India, > TNAU Campus, Lawley Road (P.O), > COIMBATORE - 641 103, > Tamil

[efloraofindia:444005] Fwd: SK1234 26 JUNE 2018

Thanks a lot, Sunoj ji -- Forwarded message - From: Sunojkumar P Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 12:09 Subject: Re: SK1234 26 JUNE 2018 To: J.M. Garg Yes. sunoj On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 10:58 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, Sunoj ji, > What about >