*Cymbidium ×gammieanum *King & Pantl. ???
Thank you.
Saroj Kasaju
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:47 AM Saroj Kasaju wrote:
> Is the ID correct ? https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/2980789739
> Thank you.
>
> Saroj Kasaju
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:38 AM Saroj Kasaju
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Thank you
Is the ID correct ? https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/2980789739
Thank you.
Saroj Kasaju
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:38 AM Saroj Kasaju wrote:
>
> Thank you Dr.Kumar !
>
> Saroj Kasaju
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 4:09 AM Pankaj Kumar
> wrote:
>
>> I think I would like to call this Cymbidium
Thank you Dr.Kumar !
Saroj Kasaju
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 4:09 AM Pankaj Kumar wrote:
> I think I would like to call this Cymbidium tracyanum.
> Pankaj
>
>
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 06:11, J.M. Garg wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Saroj ji
>>
>> -- Forwarded message -
>> From: Saroj
I think I would like to call this Cymbidium tracyanum.
Pankaj
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 06:11, J.M. Garg wrote:
> Thanks, Saroj ji
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Saroj Kasaju
> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 11:57
> Subject: Cymbidium iridioides D. Don
> To: efloraindia , J.M.
To me appears close to images at
https://efloraofindia.com/2016/08/07/dichrocephala-chrysanthemifolia/
On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 at 14:06, Saroj Kasaju wrote:
> Dear Members,
>
> Location: Latha Bhanjyang, Chapakhark, Lalitpur
> Date: 14 January 2024
> Elevation: 2100 m.
> Habit : Wild
> Myriactis
Thank you Mrt. Garg !
Saroj Kasaju
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 1:58 PM J.M. Garg wrote:
> As there is no other accepted variety, it is better to write it as simply
> Leucas ciliata in the accepted name.
>
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 15:16, Saroj Kasaju wrote:
>
>> Dear Tabish,
>>
>> I could not
Yes, really mesmerizing.
Wonderfully captured.
It will certainly add value to some of the species' pages on our site.
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 17:05, John Parrotta wrote:
> You are welcome, Garg ji! I think that is enough for today. I hope you
> are enjoying the photos.
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024
As there is no other accepted variety, it is better to write it as simply
Leucas ciliata in the accepted name.
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 15:16, Saroj Kasaju wrote:
> Dear Tabish,
>
> I could not find Leucas ciliata var. ciliata in any link and database.
>
>
8 matches
Mail list logo