m not an expert, but according to me, flowers are not observed
to vary in size to this extent, leaves usually vary in size. So, we have to
research more about this plant and expert's advice is required.
Regards,
Yogesh Sharma
On Tuesday, March 30, 2021 at 6:12:18 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote:
Resurfacing again for identification.
Regards,
Yogesh Sharma
On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 10:53:33 AM UTC+5:30 Yogesh Sharma wrote:
> Habit
>
> On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 10:52:11 AM UTC+5:30 Yogesh Sharma wrote:
>
>> Respected members,
>>
>> This is a
Respected sir,
This *Euphorbia* sp. looks different from *E. indica* as well and it has
been identified as *E. clarkeana*, on iNaturalist. So we should treat it as
the same.
Regards,
Yogesh Sharma
On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 at 4:08:47 PM UTC+5:30 Yogesh Sharma wrote:
> Thanks a
Thanks a lot Balakrishnan sir and Garg sir..
Regards,
Yogesh Sharma
On Wednesday, January 13, 2021 at 10:42:54 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote:
> Thanks, Balakrishnan ji
>
> --
> With regards,
> J. M. Garg
>
> On Wed, 13 Jan, 2021, 10:41 pm Nambiyath Balakrishnan,
> wrote:
&
Respected sir,
This doesn't look like *Phalaris minor*. It must be Pearl Millet (Bajra).
On Monday, June 1, 2020 at 10:43:59 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote:
> Thanks a lot, Manoj ji
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Manoj Chandran
> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 at 22:29
> Subject: Re: [eflo
Not D. innoxia sir, more likely to be D. metel..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discus
Thanks a lot Saroj sir..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit
Looks like any Amaranthus sp.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, vi
Thanks a lot Garg ji and Sukhorukov ji for concluding the final
identification.
On Wednesday, April 22, 2020 at 10:34:02 PM UTC+5:30, Yogesh Sharma wrote:
>
> Respected members,
>
> This is *Hypertelis cerviana *(L.) Thulin (syn. - *Mollugo cerviana *(L.)
> Ser.).
> Fa
Respected Garg sir,
Photos on our eFI's Mollugo cerviana page looks different in terms of habit.
But in photos on eFI's Mollugo disticha page plant looks very different; the
inflorescence is different, calyx size relative to the seed size is different
and also the seed number, fruits in my photos
Thankyou so much Mahadeswara ji and Saroj ji for liking the post..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
T
Sir, though I cannot follow the key provided by you from FOC, as I can't
measure size of the parts required, it could be J. analoga according to the
distributional status provided by FOC.
Further investigation needed sir, either size measurement or any literature
which shows if J. raphanifolia i
Respected Garg sir and Manoj sir,
There must be some confusion. These photos do not look like to be true *C.
biflorus* but may be *C. ciliaris* as pointed out by Anil sir..
I have posted photos of true *C. biflorus* just recently, please see, YS -
Apr2020-10.
Regards,
Yogesh Sharma
On Sunday
Thankyou so much for these encouraging words, Nidhan Singh sir..
I will do my best..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@g
Thankyou so much for such nice words Garg sir..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discuss
Thanks a lot Garg sir, for appreciating..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on
Thanks a lot respected Garg sir and Manoj sir for appreciating..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To
distributions
provided by FOC restricts it only to NE India and S. analogus has NW India in
its distributional records.
So this all seems unsatisfactory, chances are likely to be S. raphanifolius.
Regards,
Yogesh Sharma
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Thanks a lot Garg sir, for appreciating and confirming the i'd..
Regards,
Yogesh Sharma
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to indiant
Thankyou so much for appreciation sir..
On Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 6:48:28 PM UTC+5:30, Nidhan Singh wrote:
>
> Nice submission Yogesh, keep it up..
> Wait for the experts!!
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 6:24 PM Yogesh Sharma > wrote:
>
>> Respected members,
>&
Thanks Garg sir. Looks likely to be *Lactuca violifolia*, which is now
accepted as *Melanoseris violifolia* (DC.) N.Kilian according to POWO and
CoL.
But leaves in my photos looks different. Either they really are different
or just are at young stage of development.
Regards,
Yogesh Sharma
On
Thankyou for appreciating Garg sir..
Altitude was 3000-3500 metres, as told by locals.
Regards,
Yogesh Sharma
On Saturday, April 4, 2020 at 12:59:34 PM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote:
>
> Thanks, Yogesh ji, for the wonderful presentation.
> What was the altitude?
> --
> With regard
This is Cuminum cyminum L. as it was suggested by Nidhan Singh sir..
Regards
Yogesh Sharma
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to ind
This is Indigofera hochstetteri Baker.
Regards
Yogesh Sharma
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegrou
Thankyou so much Mahadeswara ji.. and Saroj sir for appreciating..
Thanks a lot Garg ji for all information and confirming the correct
nomenclature..
Regards
Yogesh Sharma
On Friday, February 21, 2020 at 12:37:08 AM UTC+5:30, Yogesh Sharma wrote:
>
> Respected all,
>
> This one
Thanks a lot Devender sir for confirmation..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion
.
Regards
Yogesh Sharma
On Wednesday, February 12, 2020 at 10:13:04 PM UTC+5:30, Yogesh Sharma
wrote:
>
> *Indigofera* sp.
> (* Indigofera sessiliflora *DC. ? )
> .
> This one is a branching silvery herb with dense axillary inflorescences. I
> hope that I have identified it rightly a
Thanks a lot to all for appreciating..
.
Thanks Garg ji for nice words. I have checked some specimens on GBIF, as you
suggested, and found some specimens with 9 leaflets..! This my posted species
matches with I. sessiliflora DC.
Regards
Yogesh Sharma
--
You received this message because you
28 matches
Mail list logo
