Fwd: Fwd: [efloraofindia:257725] MS Nov.2016/09 Hamelia macrantha ?

Thanks, Santanu ji. -- Forwarded message -- From: Santanu Dey Date: 26 November 2016 at 13:18 Subject: Re: Fwd: [efloraofindia:257691] MS Nov.2016/09 Hamelia macrantha ? To: "J.M. Garg" I think this is Mycetia longifolia. Regards Santanu Nagaland university

Re: [efloraofindia:257731] Fwd: The Genus Primula in India (A Taxonomic Revision) - Primula wigramiana does not grow in VoF!!

I express deep concern over the following lines: *"Seems, as too many Indian botanists, he is uncritically copying Hooker/FBI?" * *It should be specified as to how many Indian botanists are copying from J. D. Hooker? Is it not a generalized insult to the Indian Botanical Community as a whole?*

[efloraofindia:257728] Re: Need help with Identification

looks like basella On Friday, November 25, 2016 at 10:40:31 AM UTC+5:30, Sushrut Chakraborty wrote: > > Hello Everyone > While cleaning my roof, I found this little twiner growing out of a jammed > drain pipe. If it could grow there, it must be a tough plant. > Would love to know what it is

[efloraofindia:257732] Species, genera & family pages of‎‎‎ ‎Ebenaceae‎ are now with images

Dear members, Species, genera & family pages of*‎‎‎* *‎**Ebenaceae* *‎* are now with images. I request you to pl. go through & point out mistakes, if any. I hope this will aid in identifications in future. -- With regards,

Re: [efloraofindia:257739] Names of Plants in India :: Elaeocarpus oblongus Gaertn.

*Elaeocarpus variablis* Zmarzty, *Kew Bull. 56: 429 2001*. (Syn: *E. glandulosus* sensu auctt.; non *E. tectorius* (Lour.) Poir.; *E. oblongus* Gaertn. Sensu auctt.) as per *Elaeocarpus variablis* Zmarzty

Re: [efloraofindia:257740] Names of Plants in India :: Elaeocarpus oblongus Gaertn.

Thanks Garg ji; will wait for some time for any comment(s) before I revise my notes at flickr. Regards. Dinesh On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 8:30 PM, J.M. Garg wrote: > *Elaeocarpus variablis* Zmarzty, *Kew Bull. 56: 429 2001*. (Syn: *E. > glandulosus* sensu auctt.; non *E.

Re: [efloraofindia:257733] Fwd: [indiantreepix:26188] Confirm ID 100110AK 2

Thanks Garg Ji. I feel Renee Ji's post and mie are of the same tree. Regards, Aarti On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 1:10 PM, J.M. Garg wrote: > Diospyros discolor (Cultivated) > > as

[efloraofindia:257737] Fwd: Elaeagnus latifolia

Only single posting of this species in efi so far. Does not match with images of Elaeagnus latifolia at http://tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=558.0 http://tropical.theferns.info/viewtropical.php?id=Elaeagnus+latifolia It must be *Elaeagnus conferta Roxb.*

[efloraofindia:257738] Species, genera & family pages of‎‎‎ Elaeagnaceae‎ are now with images

Dear members, Species, genera & family pages of*‎‎‎* *Elaeagnaceae* *‎* are now with images. I request you to pl. go through & point out mistakes, if any. I hope this will aid in identifications in future. -- With

Re: [efloraofindia:257742] Re: SCARLET SUNBIRD ( MALE ) AS A POLLINATOR

wonderful pictures lots of patience for you appreciate it usha di On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 7:13 AM, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Bimal ji > > On 22 Nov 2016 7:28 pm, "Bimal Sar kar" wrote: > >> Hello , >> Attaching a collage depicting the role

[efloraofindia:257750] Re: AR 17,2010

Please read as "Aeschynomene" On Sunday, November 27, 2016 at 10:56:00 AM UTC+5:30, S Kasim wrote: > > Absence of paired bracts rule out Aeschynomen india. > It looks like Sesbania procumbens > http://flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Trailing%20Sesban.html. > > with regards. > > > On Friday,

Re: [efloraofindia:257746] Asteraceae member for ID from Uttarakhand: DSR_Nov. 2016_2/2

I also do have a similar plant recorded from Darjeeling, not yet posted I think.. I hope you have tried to see Launaea species, which is the only thing coming to my mind.. Thanks Rawat Ji for this post, which will surely help me. -- Regards, Dr. Nidhan Singh Assistant Professor Department of

Re: [efloraofindia:257747] Leaf similar to Ficus religiosa (Sacred Fig -Peepal)

My initial thoughts were the same. Some kind of a poplar. But but but, in Pune? Do they survive the harsh summers of the near-tropical region? The trees in question are already 10 to 12 years old, with a height of over 15 meters. Also there are no catkins or (visible) flowers. I am baffled. Please

[efloraofindia:257749] Re: AR 17,2010

This is not Aeschynomene indica. Pl verify the flower shape and calyx. To me it looks like Sesbania procumbens. http://flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Trailing%20Sesban.html. with regards. On Friday, November 12, 2010 at 12:31:39 PM UTC+5:30, Anantanarayan Rajaram wrote: > > The plant is a

[efloraofindia:257743] PURPLE SUN BIRD ( MALE ) AS A POLLINATOR

Hello, Here is a collage depicting role of Purple Sun Bird ( male ) as a pollinator. There are 9 flowers of different plant species. There are other flowers also where this bird visits and not included in the collage. Regards, -- You received this message

Fwd: [efloraofindia:257750] AKNOV08 Please identify this Elaeocarpus sp.

To me it appears to be *Elaeocarpus serratus* L. as per comparative images in efi. -- Forwarded message -- From: J.M. Garg Date: 4 December 2014 at

Re: [efloraofindia:257744] Re: SYMBIOSIS : 865

very near perfect usha di On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:25 PM, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Bimal ji > > On 16 Nov 2016 6:51 pm, "Bimal Sar kar" wrote: > >> Hello, >> Attaching an image of a Striped Tiger visiting flowers of >> Dysophylla stellate.

Re: [efloraofindia:257745] Leaf similar to Ficus religiosa (Sacred Fig -Peepal)

This would be a help if habit pics and locality are revealed.. Yet, see for Populus sp. -- Regards, Dr. Nidhan Singh Assistant Professor Department of Botany I.B. (PG) College Panipat-132103 Haryana Ph.: 09416371227 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[efloraofindia:257749] Re: AR 17,2010

Absence of paired bracts rule out Aeschynomen india. It looks like Sesbania procumbens http://flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Trailing%20Sesban.html. with regards. On Friday, November 12, 2010 at 12:31:39 PM UTC+5:30, Anantanarayan Rajaram wrote: > > The plant is a metre high. Flower width