[efloraofindia:325518] Physalis grisea in FOI

2019-07-21 Thread J.M. Garg
In Physalis grisea in FOI , some of the images may not be correct as per discussions at Solanaceae Week: Physalis grisea from Tikkar Tal Lake Morni

Re: [efloraofindia:325495] Fwd: Physalis for ID : 260711 : AK-2

2019-07-21 Thread Aarti S. Khale
Thanks a lot Garg Ji. Regards, Aarti On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 9:43 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > Correct wording should be: > To me appears close to images at *Physalis joe-diasii* >

Re: [efloraofindia:325515] Fwd: Physalis minima ... Physalis lagascae

2019-07-21 Thread Dinesh Valke
Thank you very much Garg ji for resurfacing the post and resolving the ID. Regards. Dinesh On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 12:39 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it should be *Physalis angulata* L. > > as

Fwd: [efloraofindia:325499] SYMBIOSIS : 395

2019-07-21 Thread J.M. Garg
I think it should be *Physalis angulata* L. as per images and details herein. -- Forwarded message - From: Bimal Sar kar Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 at 20:44 Subject:

Re: [efloraofindia:325514] Physalis Species for ID : Gangapur Grasslands : Nasik : 05NOV17 : AK-02

2019-07-21 Thread Aarti S. Khale
Thanks Garg Ji. Regards, Aarti On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 11:05 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it should be *Physalis angulata* L. > > as per images and details herein. > > -- Forwarded

[efloraofindia:325520] Physalis pruinosa in FOI

2019-07-21 Thread J.M. Garg
In Physalis pruinosa in FOI , images are of *Physalis peruviana* L. and not of *Physalis pruinosa* L.

[efloraofindia:325519] Physalis lagascae in FOI

2019-07-21 Thread J.M. Garg
In Physalis lagascae in FOI , all images appears to be incorrect. Ist image is of *Physalis pruinosa* 2nd & 3rd image are of

Re: [efloraofindia:325507] Physalis for ID : Muscat,Oman : 200113 : AK-2

2019-07-21 Thread Aarti S. Khale
Thanks Garg Ji. Regards, Aarti On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 10:13 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it should be *Physalis angulata* L. > > as per images and details herein. > > -- Forwarded

Re: [efloraofindia:325508] Physalis For ID : Oman : 230613 : AK-3

2019-07-21 Thread Aarti S. Khale
Thanks Garg Ji. Regards, Aarti On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 10:15 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it should be *Physalis angulata* L. > > as per images and details herein. > > -- Forwarded

[efloraofindia:325513] Physalis‎‎ ‎(‎Solanaceae‎) page with images of species in efloraofindia

2019-07-21 Thread J.M. Garg
Dear members, Pl. go through‎ *Physalis* *‎‎* ‎(*‎**Solanaceae* *‎*) page with images of species in efloraofindia. I request you to pl. go

Re: [efloraofindia:325525] Fwd: ID280111phk1

2019-07-21 Thread Paradesi Anjaneyulu
Garg Ji, if it's prostrate to decumbent herb then only correct. With regards. On Sun, Jul 21, 2019, 18:01 JM Garg wrote: > I think it is close to *Blumea oxyodonta* > > as >

Re: [efloraofindia:325526] NSD-21 JUL-2019 : ID-1

2019-07-21 Thread Paradesi Anjaneyulu
you're welcome, sir, Could be Pentaphylla, With regards. On Sun, 21 Jul 2019 at 10:36, 'Nayan Singh' via efloraofindia < indiantreepix@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Thanks a lot for your quick response and ID. > Any idea of species pl. > > Nayan. > ... > N.S.Dungriyal IFS >

Re: [efloraofindia:325523] Physalis Species for ID : Nasik : 14JUL19 : AK-22

2019-07-21 Thread Aarti S. Khale
Thanks Garg Ji. Regards, Aarti On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 11:28 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it should be Physalis angulata > > as > per comparative images at Physalis >

Re: [efloraofindia:325524] Rajgad, Dec 2014 :: Requesting ID - Asteraceae :: ARKFEB-05/05

2019-07-21 Thread Paradesi Anjaneyulu
Yes, Garg Ji, I too agreed with B.oxyodonta, With kind regards. On Sun, Jul 21, 2019, 18:04 J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it is close to *Blumea oxyodonta* > > as > per images,

[efloraofindia:325528] Re: Crepidium purpureum (Lindl.) Szlach.

2019-07-21 Thread Dr Pankaj Kumar
This is Crepidium biaurita. Sorry for misidentification earlier. Pankaj On Tuesday, 28 August 2018 00:54:57 UTC+8, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > > Dear Members, > > Location: Suryabinayak, Nepal > Date: 29 July 2018 > Elevation: 4700 ft. > Habit : Wild > > Syn: Malaxis purpurea (Lindl.) Kuntze.

[efloraofindia:325529] Re: SK1296 17 JUL 2018

2019-07-21 Thread Dr Pankaj Kumar
This is Crepidium biaurita. Sorry for misidetification. Pankaj On Wednesday, 18 July 2018 00:31:32 UTC+8, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > > Dear Members, > > Location: Gyaneswor, Kathmandu, Nepal > Date: 9 July 2018 > Altitude: 4000 ft. > > Crepidium ?? Malaxis ?? > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju >

[efloraofindia:325530] Re: Crepidium acuminatum (D.Don) Szlach. ???

2019-07-21 Thread Dr Pankaj Kumar
This is Crepidium acuminatum. Saroj sir, can you please send me a high resolution image of this yellow variety? Thanks and regards Pankaj On Wednesday, 2 August 2017 17:41:09 UTC+8, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > > Dear Members, > > Location: Nagarkot, Nepal > Altitude:6600 ft. > Date: 20 June

[efloraofindia:325531] Re: Crepidium purpureum SK

2019-07-21 Thread Dr Pankaj Kumar
This is Crepidium purpureum. Saroj sir, can you please send me high resolution images of these? Pankaj On Saturday, 13 August 2016 11:50:42 UTC+8, JM Garg wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Saroj Kasaju > Date: 8 August 2016 at 17:11 > Subject: Re: Sharing Malaxis

[efloraofindia:325532] Re: Crepidium acuminatum AT AUG2016/03

2019-07-21 Thread Dr Pankaj Kumar
This is very strange, infact at once I thought this is a hybrid of Crepidium acuminatum and purpureum but I think this is merely a deformed flower of Crepidium acuminatum. Pankaj On Saturday, 6 August 2016 23:43:52 UTC+8, Anil Thakur wrote: > > Crepidium acuminatum > Syn. Microstylis

[efloraofindia:325533] Re: SK31JUL8-2016:ID

2019-07-21 Thread Dr Pankaj Kumar
ok this is a bit confusing, but I think this is Crepidium biaurita and not purpureum. Its a bit mature flower so colour changed. It happens. If you look at the centre of some flowers, you can see the mounts. Sorry for wrong identification. Pankaj On Saturday, 9 July 2016 00:36:43 UTC+8, Saroj

[efloraofindia:325534] Re: ORCHIDACEAE Juss. Fortnight: Crepidium purpureum (Lindl.) Szlach. from Hong Kong, PKS-121

2019-07-21 Thread Dr Pankaj Kumar
This is surely Crepidium purpureum. Pankaj On Sunday, 20 October 2013 12:34:39 UTC+8, Dr Pankaj Kumar wrote: > > Crepidium purpureum (Lindl.) Szlach., Fragm. Florist. Geobot., Suppl. > 3: 131 (1995). > > Synonyms: > Microstylis purpurea Lindl., Gen. Sp. Orchid. Pl.: 20 (1830). > Malaxis

[efloraofindia:325535] Re: ORCHIDACEAE Juss. Fortnight: Crepidium purpureum (Lindl.) Szlach. from Hong Kong, PKS-121

2019-07-21 Thread Dr Pankaj Kumar
Even the pics uploaded by Rawat sir are different colourforms of Crepidium purpureum. Pankaj On Sunday, 20 October 2013 12:34:39 UTC+8, Dr Pankaj Kumar wrote: > > Crepidium purpureum (Lindl.) Szlach., Fragm. Florist. Geobot., Suppl. > 3: 131 (1995). > > Synonyms: > Microstylis purpurea

[efloraofindia:325536] Re: Orchid for ID

2019-07-21 Thread Dr Pankaj Kumar
This is surely Crepidium purpureum. Very strange with tiny flowers or may be bracts are longer. Cant make out of the size. Thanks Pankaj On Thursday, 12 July 2012 18:31:56 UTC+8, orchid wrote: > > Dear all, > > Please identify this orchid species, at first I think it is Crepidium > acuminatum

[efloraofindia:325537] Re: Dendrobium bicameratum Lindl.

2019-07-21 Thread Pankaj Kumar
Yes this is Dendrobium bicameratum. I imagine this used to flower in April in Dehradun. Thanks for sharing. Pankaj On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 20:16, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Dear Members > Location: Gyaneswor, Kathmandu > Date: 19 July 2019 > Elevation: 1300 m. > Habitat : Wild > > Thank you. > >

[efloraofindia:325538] Re: Dendrobium bicameratum Lindl.

2019-07-21 Thread Saroj Kasaju
Thank you Pankaj. Saroj Kaaju ! On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 7:57 am, Pankaj Kumar wrote: > Yes this is Dendrobium bicameratum. I imagine this used to flower in April > in Dehradun. > Thanks for sharing. > Pankaj > > On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 20:16, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Dear Members >> Location:

Re: [efloraofindia:325540] Requesting ID of this shrub - Lonavala - October 2013 :: 31012014 :: ARK-28

2019-07-21 Thread Alka Khare
Resurfacing a very old thread. Requesting ID of the posted plant. Regards Alka Khare On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 at 6:18:18 PM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Alka Khare > > Date: 31 January 2014

Re: [efloraofindia:325541] HP, Oct 2014 :: Requesting ID - Medium sized tree :: ARKNOV-56

2019-07-21 Thread Alka Khare
Resurfacing a very old thread. Requesting ID of the posted plant please. Thanks and regards Alka Khare On Saturday, November 29, 2014 at 8:32:37 PM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Alka Khare > > Date: 23

Re: [efloraofindia:325542] Requesting ID of this big shrub - MNP - Apr 2014 :: 08MAY2014 :: ARK-09

2019-07-21 Thread Alka Khare
Resurfacing an old thread again. Requesting ID of the posted plant. Thanks and regards Alka Khare On Thursday, May 29, 2014 at 2:10:22 PM UTC+5:30, Alka Khare wrote: > > Thank you Chauhan ji for this additional piece of information. Will be > looking forward for the flowering season, any idea

Re: [efloraofindia:325542] Re: SK31JUL8-2016:ID

2019-07-21 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Pankaj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon 22 Jul, 2019, 7:00 AM Dr Pankaj Kumar, wrote: > ok this is a bit confusing, but I think this is Crepidium biaurita and not > purpureum. > Its a bit mature flower so colour changed. It happens. If you look at the > centre of some flowers, you

Re: [efloraofindia:325542] Re: Orchid for ID

2019-07-21 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Pankaj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon 22 Jul, 2019, 7:05 AM Dr Pankaj Kumar, wrote: > This is surely Crepidium purpureum. Very strange with tiny flowers or may > be bracts are longer. > Cant make out of the size. > Thanks > Pankaj > > > On Thursday, 12 July 2012 18:31:56 UTC+8,

Re: [efloraofindia:325545] Re: Crepidium acuminatum AT AUG2016/03

2019-07-21 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Pankaj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon 22 Jul, 2019, 6:54 AM Dr Pankaj Kumar, wrote: > This is very strange, infact at once I thought this is a hybrid of > Crepidium acuminatum and purpureum but I think this is merely a deformed > flower of Crepidium acuminatum. > Pankaj > > > On

Re: [efloraofindia:325548] Re: Crepidium purpureum SK

2019-07-21 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Pankaj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon 22 Jul, 2019, 6:52 AM Dr Pankaj Kumar, wrote: > This is Crepidium purpureum. > Saroj sir, can you please send me high resolution images of these? > Pankaj > > > On Saturday, 13 August 2016 11:50:42 UTC+8, JM Garg wrote: >> >> >> --

Re: [efloraofindia:325549] Re: Crepidium acuminatum (D.Don) Szlach. ???

2019-07-21 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Pankaj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon 22 Jul, 2019, 6:51 AM Dr Pankaj Kumar, wrote: > This is Crepidium acuminatum. > Saroj sir, can you please send me a high resolution image of this yellow > variety? > Thanks and regards > Pankaj > > > On Wednesday, 2 August 2017 17:41:09

Re: [efloraofindia:325549] Re: SK1296 17 JUL 2018

2019-07-21 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Pankaj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon 22 Jul, 2019, 6:35 AM Dr Pankaj Kumar, wrote: > This is Crepidium biaurita. > Sorry for misidetification. > Pankaj > > > On Wednesday, 18 July 2018 00:31:32 UTC+8, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: >> >> Dear Members, >> >> Location: Gyaneswor,

Re: [efloraofindia:325555] Rajgad, Dec 2014 :: Requesting ID - Asteraceae :: ARKFEB-05/05

2019-07-21 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Paradesi ji. On Sun, 21 Jul 2019 at 20:47, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, Garg Ji, I too agreed with B.oxyodonta, > With kind regards. > > On Sun, Jul 21, 2019, 18:04 J.M. Garg wrote: > >> I think it is close to *Blumea oxyodonta* >>

Re: [efloraofindia:325556] Fwd: ID280111phk1

2019-07-21 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Paradesi ji, Flora of China says: Stems usually numerous, *prostrate or ascending*, 15-30(-40) cm. Pl. also see FOC illustration

[efloraofindia:325557] Blumea hieracifolia images in Flickr

2019-07-21 Thread J.M. Garg
Hi, Lalithamba ji, Your Blumea hieracifolia images in Flickr as below, seems to be of *Blumea oxyodonta* and not of *Blumea hieracifolia*

Re: [efloraofindia:325559] Rajgad, Dec 2014 :: Requesting ID - Asteraceae :: ARKFEB-05/05

2019-07-21 Thread Alka Khare
Thanks Garg ji and Paradesi ji for concluding on the ID. Regards Alka Khare -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to