[efloraofindia:432844] Re: Malaxis monophyllos (L.) Sw.

On Fri, 16 Sept 2022 at 14:52, J.M. Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > I am a bit uncertain about this. > Why is this not Malaxis cylindrostaycha? Need to see some fresh flowers. > > Pankaj > These are the only images. I could not

Re: [efloraofindia:432843] MS,Sept,2022/03 Smilax sp. for id

Who suggested the id? It seems possible as per GBIF specimens- one . But difficult to say without

[efloraofindia:432840] Fwd: Garcinia pedunculata or something else

Forwarding again for Id assistance please. Some earlier relevant feedback: I think leaves look different as per https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:927763-1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garcinia_pedunculata

Re: [efloraofindia:432838] Identification required for this plant

I think it is more closer to images at Boehmeria virgata var. scabrella rather than those at Boehmeria virgata subsp. macrophylla On Fri, 16 Sept 2022 at 06:15,

Fwd: [efloraofindia:432836] Id required.

-- Forwarded message - From: Sunit Singh Date: Tue, 20 Sept 2022 at 09:01 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:432399] Id required. To: J.M. Garg Yes Sir, it seems nearby, actually, I have a single image and don't have a sample for more confirmation. *Thanks & Regards* Sunit Singh

[efloraofindia:432836] Re: Iochroma fuchsioides in FOI

Thanks, Tabish ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 20 Sep, 2022, 7:18 am Tabish, wrote: > Thank you Garg ji, >I checked with the original description, and it does agree better with > *Iochroma > gesnerioides* (Syn: *Iochroma coccineum*). >Tabish >

Re: [efloraofindia:432836] Sesame sp.?? ID please

Thanks a Lot. Neelam karle On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 12:59:02 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Pl. check images at *Pentanema indicum* (L.) Ling > > > > On Sat, 17 Sept 2022 at 06:50,

Re: [efloraofindia:432835] Re: MS,Sept.,2022/05 Sterculia sp. ? for id.

I concur with garg ji. I had the same Id in my mind. On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 5:06:24 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > To me appears close to S.roxburghii (syn. of *Sterculia lanceifolia* > Roxb. as per POWO > ) > and

Re: [efloraofindia:432833] id confirmation

Checked sir, yes it seems *L. webbiana .* Thanks a lot. *Thanks & Regards* Sunit Singh Alpine Research Scholar [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by

[efloraofindia:432831] Re: Iochroma fuchsioides in FOI

Thank you Garg ji, I checked with the original description, and it does agree better with *Iochroma gesnerioides* (Syn: *Iochroma coccineum*). Tabish --- www.flowersofindia.net The waterhole of flower lovers On Sun, Sep

Re: [efloraofindia:432828] I'd needed for this plant

Thanks a lot, Manudev ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon, 19 Sep, 2022, 10:36 pm manudev madhavan, wrote: > Gargji, > > The plant has an erect fruiting peduncle which is lacking in *Arisaema > flavum*. > Looks like *Arisaema tortuosum* (Wall.)Schott for me > However, inflorescence and a

Re: [efloraofindia:432828] I'd needed for this plant

Thanks a lot, Pascal ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon, 19 Sep, 2022, 10:09 pm Pascal Bruggeman, wrote: > Considering the locality, leaflet shape & fruitshape, the W Himalayan form > of Arisaema tortuosum is the most likely ID. > > > > Pascal > > > > > > *From: *J.M. Garg > *Date:

[efloraofindia:432826] Re: Datura wrightii in FOI

Thank you Garg ji, I think you are right. Tabish --- www.flowersofindia.net The waterhole of flower lovers On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 12:52 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Hi, Tabish ji, > Images of Datura wrightii in FOI >

Re: [efloraofindia:432825] Re: IDentification request for Asteraceae member

I am pretty sure not Garg Ji. On Mon, 19 Sept 2022 at 13:03, J.M. Garg wrote: > Pl. check *Cyanthillium **cinereum* (L.) H.Rob. > > > On Wed, 14 Sept 2022 at 17:19, J.M. Garg

Re: [efloraofindia:432824] Re: Aglaia elaeagnoidea

We have also distribution in Andhra Pradesh, If you need any further help on this, please contact, 7702883258. On Mon, 19 Sept 2022 at 20:36, bharathi raja wrote: > I have this species. > Out of three varieties I have two. > Please let me know what details you need from me > > On Mon, 19

[efloraofindia:432823] Re: Id required.

Checking Sir, sorry for late reply. I was out of network area. On Mon, Sep 19, 2022, 10:20 PM Mailtrack Notification < notificat...@mailtrack.io> wrote: >  Hot conversation: efloraofindia opened it many times in a short period > or forwarded it. View all 77 opens >

Re: [efloraofindia:432821] I'd needed for this plant

Considering the locality, leaflet shape & fruitshape, the W Himalayan form of Arisaema tortuosum is the most likely ID. Pascal From: J.M. Garg Date: Monday, 19 September 2022 at 18:25 To: Saroj Kasaju Cc: indiantreepix@googlegroups.com , Seema Bin Zeenat Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:432567]

Re: [efloraofindia:432819] I'd needed for this plant

I think only experts can confirm id with fruits. On Thu, 15 Sept 2022 at 16:55, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Arisaema flavum (Forssk.) Schott ?? > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 3:16 PM Seema Bin Zeenat > wrote: > >> Location: Rajouri, jandk >> Date: 14/09/2022 >> >> --

Re: [efloraofindia:432817] 365 ID wild climber

Yes, very close dear Garg ji, but this flower is not open as much of *Artabotrys zeylanicus* . With kind regards, Sam. On Mon, 19 Sept 2022, 8:54 pm J.M. Garg, wrote: > Looks somewhat close to images at

Re: [efloraofindia:432817] Id required.

Any feedback, Sunit ji? On Thu, 15 Sept 2022 at 21:17, J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it looks different from the images at *Alliaria petiolata* (M.Bieb.) > Cavara & Grande > > > It appears to be some Arabis

[efloraofindia:432816] Re: Debregeasia wallichianum location

On Thu, 15 Sept 2022 at 17:13, J.M. Garg wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: J.M. Garg > Date: Mon, 12 Sept 2022 at 17:32 > Subject: Fwd: Debregeasia wallichianum location > To: efloraofindia > Cc: > > > > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > -- Forwarded

Re: [efloraofindia:432814] id confirmation

On Thu, 15 Sept 2022 at 14:53, J.M. Garg wrote: > Hi, Sunit ji, > Where is the doubt ? In fruit shape? > Flora of Pakistan > says " Berries > c. 7 mm long, ovoid, red, free" > India Biodiversity Portal >

Re: [efloraofindia:432813] Re: Aglaia elaeagnoidea

I have this species. Out of three varieties I have two. Please let me know what details you need from me On Mon, 19 Sep, 2022, 12:27 pm J.M. Garg, wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Priiti Patle > Date: Wed, 14 Sept 2022 at 13:36 > Subject: [efloraofindia:432500]

Fwd: [efloraofindia:432811] Re: MS,Sept.,2022/05 Sterculia sp. ? for id.

-- Forwarded message - From: M Sawmliana Date: Mon, 19 Sept 2022 at 17:37 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:432344] Re: MS,Sept.,2022/05 Sterculia sp. ? for id. To: J.M. Garg Sorry !! Another leaves are not available. On Mon, 19 Sep, 2022, 5:06 pm J.M. Garg, wrote: > To me appears

Re: [efloraofindia:432809] Re: MS,Sept.,2022/05 Sterculia sp. ? for id.

To me appears close to S.roxburghii (syn. of *Sterculia lanceifolia* Roxb. as per POWO ) and as per details at https://singapore.biodiversity.online/species/P-Angi-003284?imageId=0

[efloraofindia:432808] Re: IDentification request for Asteraceae member

Pl. check *Cyanthillium **cinereum* (L.) H.Rob. On Wed, 14 Sept 2022 at 17:19, J.M. Garg wrote: > > > On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 13:48, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Pl. post high res. image

Re: [efloraofindia:432807] Sesame sp.?? ID please

Pl. check images at *Pentanema indicum* (L.) Ling On Sat, 17 Sept 2022 at 06:50, J.M. Garg wrote: > Pl. post image of the complete plant. > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Fri, 16

Fwd: [efloraofindia:432806] Re: Aglaia elaeagnoidea

-- Forwarded message - From: Priiti Patle Date: Wed, 14 Sept 2022 at 13:36 Subject: [efloraofindia:432500] Re: Aglaia elaeagnoidea To: eFloraofIndia Very greeting you all I am Ms. Priti C. Patle working as an assistant professor I want to enquire about the plant Aglaia*

Re: [efloraofindia:432804] Unknown tree for ID

Pl. check *Ligustrum confusum* Decne. I am not sure. On Wed, 14 Sept 2022 at 10:20, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Samiran ji > > On Wed, 14 Sept 2022 at 08:23, Dr Samiran Panday > wrote: > >> I think this is