Fwd: [efloraofindia:333481] Garden Plant for ID : Bangalore : 16OCT19 : AK-24

2019-10-22 Thread J.M. Garg
-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Bimal Sar kar Date: Tue 22 Oct, 2019, 8:11 PM Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:332872] Garden Plant for ID : Bangalore : 16OCT19 : AK-24 To: J.M. Garg May be Syzygium myrtifolium as suggested by Madhbeshwar ji. Regards, Bimal

Re: [efloraofindia:333468] VOF Week: Herb for Id from the Valley 2012

2019-10-22 Thread J.M. Garg
Check out Myriactis wallichii- from Tabish ji in another thread. On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 12:45, J.M. Garg wrote: > Can it be *Brachyactis anomala* (DC.) Kitam. as per High resolution > specimen > <https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Fmedialib.naturalis.nl%2Ffile%2Fid

Fwd: [efloraofindia:333450] Mexican Flame Vine (Senecio confusus)

2019-10-22 Thread J.M. Garg
-- Forwarded message - From: Dhandapany Natarajan Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 16:52 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:332283] Mexican Flame Vine (Senecio confusus) To: J.M. Garg Thank you very much, Sir! I will try the link you have given me. Warm regards, Natarajan On Tue, 22 Oct

[efloraofindia:333443] Fwd: [itpmods:13338] Fwd: Aarti ji completes 10,000 messages

2019-10-22 Thread J.M. Garg
of the Book *"Trees of our Life" *Botany, Chemistry, Medicine *9**444813474/9620389349* On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 2:58 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message ----- > From: J.M. Garg > Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 14:51 > Subject: Aarti

Re: [efloraofindia:333418] Dendrobium SN 102019

2019-10-22 Thread J.M. Garg
efi page available at Dendrobium aqueum <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/o/orchidaceae/dendrobium/dendrobium-aqueum> On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 15:27, J.M. Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for validation please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > I

Re: [efloraofindia:333414] MS May, 2016/20 Climber for ID

2019-10-22 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Sawmliana ji. On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 14:59, M Sawmliana wrote: > The following Millettia spp. are reported in Mizozoram :- Millettia > cinerea, M.dorwardi, M.pachycarpa, M.peguensis, M.piscidia & M.pulchra > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019, 10:18 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > &

[efloraofindia:333411] Aarti ji completes 10,000 messages

2019-10-22 Thread J.M. Garg
Dear members, Aarti ji is with us during this wonderful journey of efi, since 30.12.2009. Shortly she will be completing 10 years of her association with efloraofindia. She has become only the 7th member to complete 10,000 messages in the history of efloraofindia

Re: [efloraofindia:333409] SK 2226 16 October 2019

2019-10-22 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Rakesh ji. On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 14:06, dr.rakesh Singh wrote: > Yes , opposite leaves . > Garg sir is exactly on the mark . > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019, 12:42 J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Also check the following species as per keys in Flora of Pakistan >&

Re: [efloraofindia:333405] SK 2226 16 October 2019

2019-10-22 Thread J.M. Garg
ed. Capsule broader than long. Seeds Winged all round Dioscorea deltoidea <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5_id=200028102> Leaves appears to be opposite ? is it so ? If so, pl. check Dioscorea belophylla <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5_id=242422012>

Re: [efloraofindia:333402] SK 2226 16 October 2019

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
I also more inclined towards it after going through comparative images and other closely related species. Leaf venation and aerial bulbils appear close. Flora of China states that leaves alternate, simple; petiole 2.5--5.5 cm; leaf

Re: [efloraofindia:333401] MS May, 2016/20 Climber for ID

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
Some Millettia sp ? >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:48 PM Saroj Kasaju >> wrote: >> >>> Fabaceae ! >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj Kasaju &g

[efloraofindia:333400] Re: Subspecies of Sida rhombifolia

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
I will try to go through the monograph as and when time permits. On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 11:01, J.M. Garg wrote: > Catalogue of Life > <https://www.catalogueoflife.org/col/details/species/id/63355384633357f969a924321e94c60b> > mentions gives subspecies of Sida rhombifolia with the

[efloraofindia:333393] Re: Cleoserrata speciosa and Tarenaya hassleriana- differences

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
Correct wording will be: I did this exercise as there were no keys or differences to be found in net and I found lot of confusion everywhere including those in efi and foi. On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 09:16, J.M. Garg wrote: > I did this exercise as there were on keys or differences to be fo

[efloraofindia:333392] Re: Cleoserrata speciosa and Tarenaya hassleriana- differences

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
And it is not only my one day, but also many days of observations (which are there in efi site) by different members. It is just like collecting hundreds of specimens from different parts of the country at different times. On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 08:41, J.M. Garg wrote: > Hi, Ushadi, >

[efloraofindia:333391] Re: Cleoserrata speciosa and Tarenaya hassleriana- differences

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
I did this exercise as there were on keys or differences to be found on net and I found lot of confusion everywhere including those in efi and foi. On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 08:41, J.M. Garg wrote: > Hi, Ushadi, > I have no doubt about what I have stated after one day of re

Re: [efloraofindia:333388] ID10102019SH3

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
ured some > they change colors , fade as it gets closer to maturing > Regards > Ushadi > > > On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 4:10 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> I think Dinesh ji is right. It is *Sheath* (The base of a leaf or >> leafstalk (petiole) which encases the stem) as per B

Fwd: [efloraofindia:333386] Grass from Agra, U.P

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Manoj ji. -- Forwarded message - From: Manoj Chandran Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 22:11 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:332594] Grass from Agra, U.P To: J.M. Garg Most likely Setaria glauca due to the comparatively large spikelets compared to the bristles. Also, more curved

Re: [efloraofindia:333385] Cleome speciosa in FOI

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
ofindia/species/a---l/cl/cleomaceae/tarenaya/cleome-hassleriana>, while these are inserted in the bottom in Cleoserrata speciosa <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/cl/cleomaceae/cleoserrata/cleome-speciosa> . On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 08:29, J.M. Garg wrote: > Hi

Re: [efloraofindia:333384] Cleome speciosa in FOI

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
ies/a---l/cl/cleomaceae/tarenaya/cleome-hassleriana> On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 08:26, J.M. Garg wrote: > Both can clawed as per Flora of China. > > On Mon 21 Oct, 2019, 10:06 PM Tabish, wrote: > >> Thanks Garg ji, for sorting out Cleome hassleriana and Cleome speciosa. >

[efloraofindia:333383] Re: Cleoserrata speciosa and Tarenaya hassleriana- differences

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
nderful group giving guidance and >> tips to me all the time. >> Regards, >> Shobha >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 4:29 PM J.M. Garg wrote: >> >>> Thanks, Saroj ji, >>> On going through all the posts in efi site, I find that

Fwd: [efloraofindia:333382] Mexican Flame Vine (Senecio confusus)

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Ashvini Gautam Date: Tue 22 Oct, 2019, 4:01 AM Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:332283] Mexican Flame Vine (Senecio confusus) To: J.M. Garg senecio confusus (mexican flame vine) can be shipped to you on order. You can check

Re: [efloraofindia:333379] Cleome speciosa in FOI

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
efloras. On Mon 21 Oct, 2019, 9:31 PM ushadi, wrote: > This is getting more confusing > > I cant believe diagnosis can be based on stamen color only > > > Regards > Ushadi > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:36 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Hi, Tabish ji, >

Re: [efloraofindia:333378] Cleome speciosa in FOI

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
believe diagnosis can be based on stamen color only >> >> >> Regards >> Ushadi >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:36 PM J.M. Garg wrote: >> >>> Hi, Tabish ji, >>> Image of Cleome speciosa in FOI >>> <http://www.flowers

[efloraofindia:333376] Fwd: SYMBIOSIS :1390

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Bimal ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Bimal Sar kar Date: Tue 22 Oct, 2019, 7:07 AM Subject: SYMBIOSIS :1390 To: Attaching a collage of Carpenter bee visiting flowers of Calliandra surinamensis. -- You received this message because you are

[efloraofindia:333376] Fwd: SYMBIOSIS : 1389

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks Bimal ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Bimal Sar kar Date: Mon 21 Oct, 2019, 5:48 PM Subject: SYMBIOSIS : 1389 To: Attaching a collage of Lime Blue butterfly visiting flowers of Cleome rutidosperma. -- You received this message because you

[efloraofindia:333344] Re: Your contribution to FOI

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Saroj ji. You are already a Father figure (in terms of your unprecedented contributions) in efi. We all are inspired from you to keep us moving in one direction i.e building efloraofindia or rather eFlora of the subcontinent. On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 17:54, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Happy to

[efloraofindia:333343] Tarenaya hassleriana in FOI

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
Hi, Tabish ji, Images of Tarenaya hassleriana in FOI should be of Cleoserrata speciosa as per efi thread

[efloraofindia:333340] Cleome speciosa in FOI

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
Hi, Tabish ji, Image of Cleome speciosa in FOI should be of *Tarenaya hassleriana* (Chodat) H. H. Iltis as per efi

Re: [efloraofindia:333332] Flower for id -29122018SH1

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
=1_id=250012252> for the time being. On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 18:49, J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it should be *Tarenaya hassleriana* > <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/cl/cleomaceae/tarenaya/cleome-hassleriana> > only. > Flora of North America >

Fwd: [efloraofindia:333312] Fwd: Id Please Cherapunjee

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
*Tarenaya hassleriana* as per discussions & keys in Cleoserrata speciosa and Tarenaya hassleriana- differences --

Fwd: [efloraofindia:333307] Capparaceae and Cleomaceae Fortnight : 03092013 ARK-01 : Cleoserrata speciosa from Mumbai - February 2013

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
*Tarenaya hassleriana* as per discussions & keys in Cleoserrata speciosa and Tarenaya hassleriana- differences --

Fwd: [efloraofindia:333303] Capparaceae and Cleomaceae Fortnight : Cleome Sp (NSJ-04 06/09/2013)

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
*Tarenaya hassleriana* as per discussions & keys in Cleoserrata speciosa and Tarenaya hassleriana- differences --

Fwd: [efloraofindia:333301] Capparaceae and Cleomaceae Fortnight:: Cleome speciosa. SMP 13

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
*Tarenaya hassleriana* as per discussions & keys in Cleoserrata speciosa and Tarenaya hassleriana- differences --

Fwd: [efloraofindia:333301] Capparaceae and Cleomaceae fortnight :: Cleoserrata speciosa at Washivali :: DV12

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
*Tarenaya hassleriana* as per discussions & keys in Cleoserrata speciosa and Tarenaya hassleriana- differences --

Fwd: [efloraofindia:333293] Fwd: Request for Id

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
*Cleoserrata speciosa* as per discussions & keys in Cleoserrata speciosa and Tarenaya hassleriana- differences --

Fwd: [efloraofindia:333286] Cleome houtteana Schltdl SN Sep 53

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
-- Forwarded message - From: Ponnutheerthagiri Santhan Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 at 15:01 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:201438] Cleome houtteana Schltdl SN Sep 53 To: J.M. Garg , Prabhu kumar Km * It does not contain spines, I agree with the name Tarenaya hassleriana* (≡) *Cleome

Fwd: [efloraofindia:333286] Capparaceae and Cleomaceae fortnight :: Tarenaya hassleriana in Mumbai gardens :: DV11

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
*Cleoserrata speciosa* as per discussions & keys in Cleoserrata speciosa and Tarenaya hassleriana- differences --

[efloraofindia:333281] Re: Cleoserrata speciosa and Tarenaya hassleriana- differences

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
at times I advise > members to stop at Genus and stop guessing species , on facebook . > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019, 14:16 J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Giving details from Flora of China: >> *Cleoserrata speciosa (Rafinesque) Iltis*: >> Herbs, annual, 0.5-1.5 m tall. Stems simple or

[efloraofindia:333276] Re: Cleoserrata speciosa and Tarenaya hassleriana- differences

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
spines present - *Tarenaya* <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2_id=132319> (prickles often present on petiole and major leaf veins). On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 13:41, J.M. Garg wrote: > Cleoserrata speciosa > <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/cl/c

[efloraofindia:333272] Cleoserrata speciosa and Tarenaya hassleriana- differences

2019-10-21 Thread J.M. Garg
Cleoserrata speciosa and Tarenaya hassleriana looks quite close in efi site. I tried to find

Re: [efloraofindia:333204] Re: Smilax lanceifolia Roxb. ??

2019-10-20 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Saroj ji. On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 18:07, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > This has been confirmed by Mr. Sajan Subedi who has done a dissertation > on Revision of the Genus Smilax. L. in Nepal. > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 5:25 PM J.M.

Re: [efloraofindia:333201] Re: Smilax lanceifolia Roxb. ??

2019-10-20 Thread J.M. Garg
Confirmed by whom ? On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 10:41, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > This has been confirmed as Smilax lanceifolia Roxb.! > > > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 12:07 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> >> ---------- Forwarded

Re: [efloraofindia:333197] Name please, from Neora Valley, Kalimpong, West Bengal

2019-10-20 Thread J.M. Garg
gle.com/forum/#!topic/indiantreepix/gl64bN5w2DE> On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 08:44, J.M. Garg wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Tapas Chakrabarty > Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 18:49 > Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:332759] Name please, from Neora Valley, > K

[efloraofindia:333192] Subspecies of Cannabis sativa

2019-10-20 Thread J.M. Garg
Catalogue of life gives three subspecies: *Cannabis sativa *subsp.* indica* (Lam.) E. Small & A. Cronquist (Pakistan, Afghanistan (Badakshan, Kabul, Kandahar, Kunar / Nuristan, Laghman, Nangarhar, Paktia /

[efloraofindia:333191] Re: Elaeagnus conferta in FOI

2019-10-20 Thread J.M. Garg
In fact, this page: Elaeagnus conferta in FOI <http://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Wild%20Olive.html> itself needs to be deleted as fruits can not be relied upon for id. On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 13:23, J.M. Garg wrote: > I still feel that flowering image from Manipur is mo

[efloraofindia:333185] Re: Elaeagnus conferta in FOI

2019-10-20 Thread J.M. Garg
.net>www.flowersofindia.net > The waterhole of flower lovers > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 1:00 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Hi, Tabish ji, >> I think Prashant ji image at Elaeagnus conferta in FOI >> <http://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Wild%20Olive.html>, still

Fwd: [efloraofindia:333180] Fwd: Ivy Creeper : 120810-AK

2019-10-19 Thread J.M. Garg
I think it should be *Hedera nepalensis* K.Koch as per discussions at ID request-21102010-PKA3 - efloraofindia | Google Groups

[efloraofindia:333177] Fwd: SYMBIOSIS : 1388

2019-10-19 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Bimal ji. -- Forwarded message - From: Bimal Sar kar Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 07:47 Subject: SYMBIOSIS : 1388 To: Attaching a collage of Peacock Pansy visiting flowers of Catharanthus roseus.( VINCA/NAYANTARA ) -- With regards, J.M.Garg 'Creating awareness of

Re: [efloraofindia:333176] Re: Clematis viticella from Kashmir

2019-10-19 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Ushadi. On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 20:47, ushadi wrote: > uRL for that book is > > https://ia800205.us.archive.org/35/items/clematisasagard00jackgoog/clematisasagard00jackgoog.pdf > > see pages 64, plate X on page 95, 100, etc. etc look for yourself > > none of these are native,

[efloraofindia:333174] Re: Clematis viticella from Kashmir

2019-10-19 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Singh ji. On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 19:34, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Clematis x jackmanii as explained in another post. > > I hope you are right Garg ji, Looking at the confusion on various > websites, I think it would be right to name it as C. x jackmanii (both GRIN > and Kew database),

[efloraofindia:333174] Re: Ranunculaceae Week: Clematis viticella from Kashmir and California

2019-10-19 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Singh ji. On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 19:31, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > I hope you are right Garg ji, Looking at the confusion on various > websites, I think it would be right to name it as C. x jackmanii (both GRIN > and Kew database), TPL and Plants of the World Online list C. jackmanii, >

[efloraofindia:333173] Fwd: Caesalpinia bonduc( L.) Roxb.

2019-10-19 Thread J.M. Garg
-- Forwarded message - From: Jayanta Kumar Jena Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 22:57 Subject: Re: Caesalpinia bonduc( L.) Roxb. To: J.M. Garg Thank you Sir for your confirmation & response, with regards,jayanta k jena On Sat, 19 Oct 2019, 17:24 J.M. Garg

[efloraofindia:333104] Re: SK 2212 09 October 2019

2019-10-19 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks a lot, Tapas ji. On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 18:31, Tapas Chakrabarty wrote: > The above key is correct and this is Neolitsea cuipala. > > On Sat, 19 Oct 2019, 17:55 J.M. Garg, wrote: > >> Flora of Bhutan gives the following keys: >> 1. Leaves oblanceolate, 13-25cm,

Re: [efloraofindia:333103] Grass from Agra, U.P

2019-10-19 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Tarbej ji. On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 18:34, Shaikh Tarbej wrote: > Generally Setaria glauca having longer Raceme > While S. pumila not > > On Sat, Oct 19, 2019, 16:24 J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Tarbez ji for id as Setaria pumila >> <https://sites.google.co

[efloraofindia:333090] Fwd: SK 2195 23 September 2019

2019-10-19 Thread J.M. Garg
-- Forwarded message - From: Saroj Kasaju Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 08:38 Subject: Re: SK 2195 23 September 2019 To: navendu page Cc: J.M. Garg That is ok Navendu ji. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 8:49 am, navendu page wrote: > Dear Saroj Ji, &g

Re: [efloraofindia:333089] Re: Lilium Species for ID : Yellow Flowers : Alexandria Bay , 1000 Islands, New York : 13OCT19 : AK-17

2019-10-19 Thread J.M. Garg
There are many other similar cultivars but difficult to make out details at https://www.vws-flowerbulbs.nl/flower-bulb/578/orange-pixie On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 at 15:32, ushadi wrote: > most likely, I essentially was going with it, > but I saw some gradations of color in petals so was going to do

[efloraofindia:333082] Fwd: SYMBIOSIS : 1386

2019-10-19 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Bimal ji. -- Forwarded message - From: Bimal Sar kar Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 21:07 Subject: SYMBIOSIS : 1386 To: Attaching a collage of a Wasp species visiting flowers of Mukia species. -- With regards, J.M.Garg 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'

Re: [efloraofindia:333077] Tree for ID : New Jersey,US : 11SEP17 : AK-08

2019-10-19 Thread J.M. Garg
aju >> wrote: >> >>> Carya alba (L.) Nutt. ex Elliott Syn :Carya tomentosa (Lam.) Nutt. ?? >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj Kasaju >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 4:32 PM J.M. Garg wrote: >>> &g

[efloraofindia:333076] Fwd: oreocome-candollei - All links says Ligusticopsis wallichi...

2019-10-19 Thread J.M. Garg
I have purposely kept it as *Oreocome candollei *(Wall. ex DC.) Edgew.≡ *Selinum candollei *Wall. ex DC. ≡ *Cortia candollei* (Wall. ex DC.) Leute = *Oreocome elata *Edgew. ≡ *Selinum elatum *(Edgew.) M. Hiroe as per Himalayan species of Selinum L. sl - BioOne

Fwd: [efloraofindia:333075] ID please: CR10102019_1

2019-10-19 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks a lot, Shantanu ji. -- Forwarded message - From: Shantanu Chavan Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 11:07 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:332168] ID please: CR10102019_1 To: J.M. Garg Alysicarpus vaginslis L. On Thu, 17 Oct, 2019, 11:41 AM J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks, Rakesh

[efloraofindia:333074] Re: SK 2211 08 October 2019 - Mycophyta

2019-10-18 Thread J.M. Garg
t; > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 5:03 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Some Polyporaceae >> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species--fungi/a---l/b/basidiomycota/agaricomycetes/polyporales/polyporaceae> >> member. >> May be some Fomes >> <https://sit

[efloraofindia:333071] Re: SK 2204 04 October 201

2019-10-18 Thread J.M. Garg
; > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:29 AM Saroj Kasaju > wrote: > >> My suggestion Crotalaria kanaii is not matching ! >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:25 AM J.M. Garg wrote: >> >>> Forw

Re: [efloraofindia:333054] Re: SK 2220 12 October 2019

2019-10-18 Thread J.M. Garg
e: > >> No idea as such. could it be Solanaceae ?? >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 1:13 PM J.M. Garg wrote: >> >>> Any idea about the family ? >>> >>> -- Forwarded me

[efloraofindia:333028] Re: SK 2215 11 October 2019

2019-10-18 Thread J.M. Garg
I feel some like Inuleae <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/ar/asteraceae/asteroideae/inuleae> member like ‎Inula <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/ar/asteraceae/asteroideae/inuleae/inula> On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 14:16, J.M. Garg wr

[efloraofindia:333026] Re: SK 2215 11 October 2019

2019-10-18 Thread J.M. Garg
I do not think so. On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 13:12, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you Mr. Garg . I am also trying but no result ! > Could it be Laggera or Blumea ?? > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 1:05 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> I tried with k

Re: [efloraofindia:333018] Need help to identify this Cyperaceae

2019-10-18 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Rakesh ji. On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 10:41, dr.rakesh Singh wrote: > Cyperus alulatus > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:35 PM ankushdave . > wrote: > >> Members, >> >> >> Need help to identify this Cyperaceae >> Date: 16 October 19 >> Agra, U.P >> >> >> >> Thanking You, >> Ankush >> Mob:-

[efloraofindia:333018] Re: SK 2215 11 October 2019

2019-10-18 Thread J.M. Garg
I tried with keys in Flora of Bhutan, but could not succeed in id. On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 11:14, J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, looks different from Neobrachyactis pubescens > <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/ar/asteraceae/asteroideae/astereae/neobrachyactis/neobr

Fwd: [efloraofindia:333008] Re: MS/10/2/2019 - Plant ID request

2019-10-17 Thread J.M. Garg
-- Forwarded message - From: M Swamy Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 09:10 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:332996] Re: MS/10/2/2019 - Plant ID request To: J.M. Garg Thanks Aarti, Nidhan ji and Garg ji for the quick response. I could go up to Genus level but did not try species ID. I

Re: [efloraofindia:333006] Re: Id requested of a twiner

2019-10-17 Thread J.M. Garg
Forwarded message - >> From: Jayanta Kumar Jena >> Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 at 13:46 >> Subject: Id requested of a twiner >> To: J.M. Garg >> >> >> Good afternoon Sir, requesting id of a twiner found around Tulsi plant >> today at Bhubaneswar,Odisha

[efloraofindia:332999] Fwd: SYMBIOSIS : 1387

2019-10-17 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Bimal ji. -- Forwarded message - From: Bimal Sar kar Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 08:32 Subject: SYMBIOSIS : 1387 To: Attaching a collage of Common Grass Yellow visiting flowers of Asystasia species. -- With regards, J.M.Garg 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora &

Re: [efloraofindia:332999] Re: MS/10/2/2019 - Plant ID request

2019-10-17 Thread J.M. Garg
t;> On Thursday, October 17, 2019 at 11:46:26 AM UTC+4, JM Garg wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> -- Forwarded message - >>> From: M Swamy >>> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 11:20 >>> Subject: MS/10/2/2019 - Plant ID request >>&

Re: [efloraofindia:332999] Re: MS/10/2/2019 - Plant ID request

2019-10-17 Thread J.M. Garg
e - >> From: M Swamy >> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 11:20 >> Subject: MS/10/2/2019 - Plant ID request >> To: J.M. Garg >> >> >> Kindly identify the herb : >> >> Date/Time- October 2019 >> >> Location-Place, Altitude, GPS- Che

[efloraofindia:332953] Re: Keys of Ophiorrhiza species of South India

2019-10-17 Thread J.M. Garg
There must be some publication having keys of South Indian species. May I request somebody to pl. share it with me. On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 at 15:19, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Santhosh ji. > Yes, it is really a very difficult genus. > But there must be keys somewhere? > > On Sun, 13

[efloraofindia:332928] Re: Subspecies of Sida rhombifolia

2019-10-16 Thread J.M. Garg
ite/efloraofindia/species/m---z/m/malvaceae/sida/sida-rhombifolia> ? On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 11:01, J.M. Garg wrote: > Catalogue of Life > <https://www.catalogueoflife.org/col/details/species/id/63355384633357f969a924321e94c60b> > mentions gives subspecies of Sida rhombifol

[efloraofindia:332927] Subspecies of Sida rhombifolia

2019-10-16 Thread J.M. Garg
Catalogue of Life mentions gives subspecies of Sida rhombifolia with their distribution. Those distributed in India are Sida rhombifolia subsp. rhombifolia

Re: [efloraofindia:332919] Re: Leaf veins are important for id in closer species

2019-10-16 Thread J.M. Garg
; Regards >> Ushadi >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:34 PM Jayanta Kumar Jena < >> jayantakumarjena1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Sir, as said by Sj. Garg Sir, leaf veins play vital role in id as in >>> case of Ficus religiosa,Ficus arno

Re: [efloraofindia:332917] ID help

2019-10-16 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Rakesh ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Wed 16 Oct, 2019, 7:19 PM dr.rakesh Singh, wrote: > Leaf on right seems split .that indicates sinuationso I think U. > sinuata should be an educated guess . > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 5:31 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >>

Re: [efloraofindia:332913] orn. malvaceae from Hooghly 3/11/12 sk2

2019-10-16 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Ushadi On Wed 16 Oct, 2019, 10:30 PM ushadi, wrote: > esp pic 109 > > yes you are right Gargji > Regards > Ushadi > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 7:15 PM dr.rakesh Singh > wrote: > >> Yessir ! >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 6:08 PM J.M. G

Re: [efloraofindia:332913] orn. malvaceae from Hooghly 3/11/12 sk2

2019-10-16 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Rakesh ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Wed 16 Oct, 2019, 7:15 PM dr.rakesh Singh, wrote: > Yessir ! > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 6:08 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> I think it should be Hibiscus acetosella >> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species

[efloraofindia:332913] Fwd: SK 2218 12 October 2019

2019-10-16 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Balakrishnan ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Nambiyath Balakrishnan <> Date: Wed 16 Oct, 2019, 9:45 PM Subject: Re: SK 2218 12 October 2019 To: J.M. Garg Dear Garg Ji This is a cultivated species, not indigenous to the Indian subcon

[efloraofindia:332912] Fwd: SYMBIOSIS : 1386

2019-10-16 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Bimal ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Bimal Sar kar Date: Thu 17 Oct, 2019, 8:11 AM Subject: SYMBIOSIS : 1386 To: Attaching a collage of Wasp species visiting flowers of Mukia species. -- You received this message because you are

Re: [efloraofindia:332852] ID help

2019-10-16 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Saroj ji and Rakesh ji On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 at 12:58, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > No leaf image? Habitat ? Date? Elevation ? > Urena lobata? > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 at 1:07 pm, Umesh Vaghela wrote: > >> Photographed at Ratnagiri >> >> -- >> You received this

Re: [efloraofindia:332844] Requesting ID of this plant - Mumbai - Oct 2013 :: 01032014 :: ARK-03

2019-10-16 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Saroj ji. On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 at 14:20, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Smithia salsuginea Hance ?? > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 9:37 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J. M. Garg >>

[efloraofindia:332820] Re: Canthium coromandelicum( Burm. f.)Alston

2019-10-16 Thread J.M. Garg
1& sr no > 6 are of Carissa carandas with ripen black edible berries & rest are of > Canthium coromandelicum with berries made into curry & ripen berry relished > by children, kindly pass it , with regards, jayanta k. jena > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2019, 09:06 J.M. Garg >>

Re: [efloraofindia:332817] Mexican Flame Vine (Senecio confusus)

2019-10-16 Thread J.M. Garg
hiruvanmiyur up to Golden Beach. > 3. If you visit Bangalore try at nurseries surrounding Lalbagh (Siddapura > area). > All the best  > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:40 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Forwarding again for any assistance in the matter please. >> >> This

Fwd: [efloraofindia:332804] Mexican Flame Vine (Senecio confusus)

2019-10-15 Thread J.M. Garg
Forwarding again for any assistance in the matter please. This is syn. of *Pseudogynoxys chenopodioides* as per details herein. -- Forwarded

Fwd: [efloraofindia:332797] Name please, from Neora Valley, Kalimpong, West Bengal

2019-10-15 Thread J.M. Garg
-- Forwarded message - From: Tapas Chakrabarty Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 18:49 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:332759] Name please, from Neora Valley, Kalimpong, West Bengal To: J.M. Garg Thank you so much. Kind regards, Tapas. On Tue, Oct 15, 2019, 18:01 J.M. Garg wrote

[efloraofindia:332797] Fwd: [itpmods:13329] Fwd: Leaf veins are important for id in closer species

2019-10-15 Thread J.M. Garg
ences, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & > Technology Pantnagar-263 145 Uttarakhand, INDIA > *eflorapantnagar* <https://sites.google.com/site/eflorapantnagar/home> > displaying wild flora of Pantnagar > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 9:14 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> >&g

Re: [efloraofindia:332796] Re: Xenostegia tridentata subspecies

2019-10-15 Thread J.M. Garg
ints , occuring with other leaves having simple acute > mucuronate tip . > My point is , many specimen need to be examined before settling this > debate . > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019, 16:53 J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Rakesh ji. >> This is contradictory to Book at Mer

[efloraofindia:332775] Fwd: [itpmods:13326] Fwd: Leaf veins are important for id in closer species

2019-10-15 Thread J.M. Garg
Oct 15, 2019 at 1:25 PM Pankaj Kumar > wrote: > >> sorry "idle" :( >> >> On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 15:46, ushadi wrote: >> >>> Pankaj >>> So p foetida has the most stomata >>> I wonder why? >>> >>> good use

Re: [efloraofindia:332774] Name please, from Neora Valley, Kalimpong, West Bengal

2019-10-15 Thread J.M. Garg
jq273OkJ7lAhWFV30KHTFFAaQQMwh3KCgwKA=mrc=8> > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 3:47 PM Tapas Chakrabarty > wrote: > >> They have collected that also. But here the fruits are entirely different. >> Kind regards, >> Tap

[efloraofindia:332773] Re: Xenostegia tridentata subspecies

2019-10-15 Thread J.M. Garg
Thanks, Rakesh ji. This is contradictory to Book at Merremia tridentata subsp. hastata which says in note that subsp. *tridentata* also occurs in S. India but *has leaves and outer sepal obtuse- emarginate*. On Tue, 15 Oct

Re: [efloraofindia:332758] TQ-Arunachal-1 Unidentified

2019-10-15 Thread J.M. Garg
base64%3DL2hlcmJhcml1bV9zcGVjaW1lbl9zY2Fucy9FMDAvMjg4LzU3OC80MTE4OS5qcGc%3D https://api.gbif.org/v1/image/unsafe/http%3A%2F%2Frepo.rbge.org.uk%2Fimage_server.php%3Fkind%3D1500%26path_base64%3DL2hlcmJhcml1bV9zcGVjaW1lbl9zY2Fucy9FMDAvMjg0Lzk3Ny80MDk0NS5qcGc%3D On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 14:47, J.M. Garg

Re: [efloraofindia:332757] TQ-Arunachal-1 Unidentified

2019-10-15 Thread J.M. Garg
See the lectotype of Chonemorpha macrantha <http://mediaphoto.mnhn.fr/media/1443168876724rPsruaJzpFJfQ0eJ> On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 14:45, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Tabish ji. > This seems to be 1947 publication. > I went through the keys and description closely for three speci

Re: [efloraofindia:332756] TQ-Arunachal-1 Unidentified

2019-10-15 Thread J.M. Garg
wersofindia.net > The waterhole of flower lovers <http://www.flowersofindia.net> > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:43 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Two more species are reported in Flora of China >> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2_id=10686

[efloraofindia:332750] Fwd: [itpmods:13321] Fwd: Leaf veins are important for id in closer species

2019-10-15 Thread J.M. Garg
kaj > So p foetida has the most stomata > I wonder why? > > good use of Idle time ... I would say ideal ( pun intended) ha ha > > > Regards > Ushadi > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:10 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Pankaj ji. >> >> On Tue,

[efloraofindia:332752] Fwd: [itpmods:13320] Fwd: Leaf veins are important for id in closer species

2019-10-15 Thread J.M. Garg
>> sorry "idle" :( >> >> On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 15:46, ushadi wrote: >> >>> Pankaj >>> So p foetida has the most stomata >>> I wonder why? >>> >>> good use of Idle time ... I would say ideal ( pun intended) ha ha >>&

[efloraofindia:332749] Fwd: [itpmods:13317] Fwd: Leaf veins are important for id in closer species

2019-10-15 Thread J.M. Garg
ideal ( pun intended) ha ha Regards Ushadi On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:10 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Pankaj ji. > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 09:56, Pankaj Kumar wrote: > >> Here is one of my first articles I had worked on 2001 but published in >> 2003. Not an extraor

[efloraofindia:332751] Fwd: [itpmods:13319] Fwd: Leaf veins are important for id in closer species

2019-10-15 Thread J.M. Garg
eal ( pun intended) ha ha >> >> >> Regards >> Ushadi >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:10 PM J.M. Garg wrote: >> >>> Thanks, Pankaj ji. >>> >>> On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 09:56, Pankaj Kumar >>> wrote: >>> >>&

[efloraofindia:332750] Fwd: [itpmods:13318] Fwd: Leaf veins are important for id in closer species

2019-10-15 Thread J.M. Garg
So p foetida has the most stomata > I wonder why? > > good use of Idle time ... I would say ideal ( pun intended) ha ha > > > Regards > Ushadi > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:10 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Pankaj ji. >> >> On Tue, 15 Oct 20

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >