Description of Cardamine scutata Thunberg. in Flora of China doesn't agree at all with the description of Cardamine subumbellata Hook. f. & Anders. in Flora of British India. So, surely they must be different plants. Am I missing something? - Tabish
On Jul 15, 1:46 pm, "Pardeshi S." <satishparde...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hell all > Cardamine scutata Thunb. in Tran. L. Soc. London 2: 339, 1794; > Almeida, Fl. Mah. 1: 42, 1996. > Synonyms: C. flexuosa With., Bot. Arr. Brit. Pl. ed. 3, 578, 1796. > C. subumbellata Hook. f. & Anders. in Fl. Brit. India 1: 138, 1872; > Cooke, Fl. Pres. Bombay 1: 32, 1958 (Repr.). > C. hirsuta var. sylvatica, (L.) Hook.f., in Fl. Brit. India 1: 138, > 1872. > C. trichocarpa Hochst. ex A. Rich. Tent. Fl. Abyss. 1: 18, 1847; Singh > et al. Fl. Mah. St. 1: 201, 2000; Pradhan et al, Fl. SGNP 94, 2005. > > C. subumbellata is the synonym of C. scutata. refer Almeida, Fl. Mah. > 1: 42, 1996. > quiet common on rocky patches in Mumbai at SGNP, Mahim fort and Sewri > fort. > > Regards > Satish Pardeshi > > On Jul 15, 1:26 pm, Tabish <tabi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear Dinesh, > > Kudos for the thorough post, including the excerpts from the > > original reference of C. subumbellata - Flora of British India, > > Hooker. > > The leaves seem to agree very well with the description. I had also > > zoomed in to one of your pictures to see that the flowers have 6 > > stamens. > > - Tabish > > > On Jul 15, 1:06 pm, Dinesh Valke <dinesh.va...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear friends, > > > ID provided by Satish Pardeshi ji over Google Buzz ... *Cardamine > > > scutata*. > > > Seems to me, *C. subumbellata** > > > > * > > > Date/Time : July 11, 2010 at 8.07am IST > > > Location Place : near Prabal Machi, Panvel, Maharashtra > > > Altitude : about 204 m (above mean sea level) > > > GPS : around 18.982835°N, 73.211909°E > > > > Habitat : wild, along forest trails > > > Type : moist deciduous forest > > > > Plant > > > Habit : herb > > > Height : about 25 - 30 cm > > > > ** > > > > Satish ji, while gathering information from internet: > > > 1) the plant posted by me looks more agreeable with C. subumbellata > > > references: > > > a) Cooke's flora ... description attached ... online > > > athttp://www.archive.org/stream/floraofpresidenc01cook#page/30/mode/2up... > > > b) Hooker's flora ... description attached ... online > > > athttp://www.archive.org/stream/floraofbritishin01hook#page/138/mode/2u... > > > > 2) Status of *C. scutata* not very clear ... an article related to > > > Cardamine > > > species in American journal of Botany > > > athttp://www.amjbot.org/cgi/content/full/93/8/1206 > > > a) at flickr looks different (although, not dependable) > > > ...http://www.flickr.com/search/?w=all&q=Cardamine+scutata&m=text > > > > 3) at IPNI (as Tabish pointed out), *C. subumbellata* is an accepted name, > > > with no synonyms > > > ,,,http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do;jsessionid=B5D106882C74... > > > > Dear friends and Satish ji, please resolve this query. > > > > Regards. > > > > P1200643.jpg > > > 182KViewDownload > > > > P1200578.jpg > > > 118KViewDownload > > > > P1200579.jpg > > > 93KViewDownload > > > > P1200641.jpg > > > 104KViewDownload > > > > P1200641_cropped.jpg > > > 148KViewDownload > > > > cardamine_desc_Hooker.jpg > > > 77KViewDownload > > > > cardamine_desc_Cooke.jpg > > > 142KViewDownload
