Thanks Gurcharan ji and Dinesh ji, you are partially correct: it is also treated as S. rhombifolia subsp. retusa. Now it is the typical variety under S. alnifolia.
Regards Vijayasankar Raman National Center for Natural Products Research University of Mississippi On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Dinesh Valke <dinesh.va...@gmail.com>wrote: > ... many thanks Vijayasankar ji for letting me know this as *S. alnifolia* > . > Have always been considering it as *S. rhombifolia* ... need to clean my > notes. > > Regards. > Dinesh > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Vijayasankar > <vijay.botan...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> *Sida alnifolia *from Gujarat. Pl compare this with S. rhombifolia... >> >> Regards >> >> Vijayasankar Raman >> National Center for Natural Products Research >> University of Mississippi >> > >
