Giby ji
How could you also make the same mistake.? Your first photograph clearly
shows 4 pairs (8 leaflets) of leaflets, Satish ji first photograph 3 pairs
(6 leaflets) and second 4 pairs (8 leaflets). He last two photographs of
Satish ji are an abberation and should be taken as normal.


-- 
Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/

On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Giby Kuriakose <giby.kuriak...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Dear sir,
>
> I too got 2 pairs of leaflets in my plants. I have checked several plants
> around and most of them having 2 pairs of leaflets as well.
> Now there are 2-4 leaflets (I havent seen 5 pairs yet) on the same plant.
> I shall upload pictures if necessary.
>
> Regards
> Giby
>
>
>
>
> On 27 October 2011 21:11, Gurcharan Singh <singh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Satish ji
>> The whole problem in this thread is because where there are four leaflets
>> (two pairs) you are counting them as two leaflets, and where they are eight
>> (4 pairs) you count them as 4. I had doubt about this after seeing Giby ji's
>> photographs, but your upload now confirms it.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>> Retired  Associate Professor
>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Satish Phadke <drsmpha...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Agreed Gurcharan ji
>>> We and Science (I mean Scientific community) require many more people
>>> with similar mind as yours.Nothing should be taken for granted unless one
>>> personally checks and satisfied about it.
>>> I am ready to check the plant further. You have a valid point there.
>>> I have not gone in details of the paper but will do so.
>>> Regarding my plant.....I want to stress that There are quite a few plants
>>> (So called Cassia uniflora ;attaching a picture) with similar looking
>>> flowers and leaves. Some plants in the group are very small(^inches or so)
>>> producing flowers and leaves very similar to these but only with two twigs
>>> having two pairs of leaflets as in earlier posted picture. Can't a plant
>>> have less number of leaflets? The pods are also seen in some which might be
>>> helpful.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Gurcharan Singh <singh...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes Giby ji
>>>> Your plant has clearly four pairs of leaflets. This is what I have been
>>>> stressing all through.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Gurcharan Singh <singh...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear Giby ji
>>>>> I think you have gone through the paper for which I have sent the link.
>>>>> When we are considering the introduced species we should rely more on the
>>>>> Books pertaining to that area and not local floras. If you have gone 
>>>>> through
>>>>> the cited paper you will realize that key in the genus is often based on
>>>>> number of leaflets as one character (besides others). This plant as Satish
>>>>> ji has mentioned and seen in the photograph has only four leaflets, and
>>>>> Satish ji has seen some with only two leaflets. How can we believe an
>>>>> introduced weed which is supposed to have generally 4 pairs of leaflets 
>>>>> (3-5
>>>>> pairs) can have only 2-4 leaflets in our area, Please give serious thought
>>>>> to it. I am attaching the paper in case you did not read it.
>>>>>
>>>>> And yes if I am providing you the detailed nomenclature I must be
>>>>> knowing all its synonyms including C. sericea,,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Giby Kuriakose <
>>>>> giby.kuriak...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Gurcharan ji,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Senna uniflora* (Mill.) H.S.Irwin & Barne has several synonyms as
>>>>>> per the plant list (http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/ild-21536) and
>>>>>> *Cassia sericea* is one among them.
>>>>>> *
>>>>>> *
>>>>>> *C. sericea *has been mentioned in several flora books such as Flora
>>>>>> of Coorg (Murthy & Yoganarasimhan, 1990), Flora of Udupi (Bhat, 2003)
>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I too got this plant recently and photographed in detail from
>>>>>> Bangalore. I shall upload them soon. I have identified my *specimen *by
>>>>>> running the key as *C. sericea *and while checking the name in the
>>>>>> plant list I found that this is *S. uniflora* now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Giby
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27 October 2011 14:50, Gurcharan Singh <singh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry Satish ji
>>>>>>> Some mix up in formatting earlier. here is correct form
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear Satish ji
>>>>>>> Thanks for your conclusion, but I would like you to consider a few
>>>>>>> things before taking a final decision.
>>>>>>> I have not seen this plant in nature myself but judging from the
>>>>>>> available information, I fear it never has 4 leaflets, not to say of 2
>>>>>>> leaflets that you write.
>>>>>>> Senna uniflora is an American weed, and only recently introduced in
>>>>>>> India (Not reported in FBI), and we can't expect it to undergo drastic
>>>>>>> changes in India over a short period of time.
>>>>>>> From all sources of information the species usually has 4 pairs of
>>>>>>> leaflets (and not 4 leaflets) though the number may varry from 3-5 
>>>>>>> pairs.
>>>>>>> Some identifications get fixed in mind and difficult to forget. My
>>>>>>> colleagues would fight with me when I would tell them spinach they are 
>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>> in their practicals is not Spinaceae oleracea, rather leafy vegetable a
>>>>>>> variety of Beta vulgaris. It took me more than 10 years to make them
>>>>>>> understand when they gave this plant in taxonomy classes. The 
>>>>>>> description of
>>>>>>> two is poles apart.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I request you to kindly go through the attached paper, study the
>>>>>>> plants and then decide.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/6352/1/NPR%208(5)%20525-527.pdf<http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/6352/1/NPR%208%285%29%20525-527.pdf>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am not saying that this is Senna absus, but just for infrmation S.
>>>>>>> absus is a species long established in India, has four leaflets and 
>>>>>>> also a
>>>>>>> gland between the leaflets.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Senna unflora has been introduced in in many places in India
>>>>>>> including Pune, Karanataka and other places, and you and other members 
>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>> soon find specimens with true S. uniflora characters.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Gurcharan Singh <singh...@gmail.com
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear Satish ji
>>>>>>>> Thanks for your conclusion, but I would like you to consider a few
>>>>>>>> things before taking a final decision.
>>>>>>>> I have not seen this plant in nature myself but judging from the
>>>>>>>> available information, I fear it never has 4 leaflets, not to say of 2
>>>>>>>> leaflets that you write.
>>>>>>>> Senna uniflora is an American weed, and only recently introduced in
>>>>>>>> India (Not reported in FBI), and we can't expect it to undergo drastic
>>>>>>>> changes in India over a short period of time.
>>>>>>>> From all sources of information the species usually has 4 pairs of
>>>>>>>> leaflets (and not 4 leaflets) though the number may varry from 3-5 
>>>>>>>> pairs.
>>>>>>>> Some identifications get fixed in mind and difficult to forget. My
>>>>>>>> colleagues would fight with me when I would tell them spinach they are 
>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>> in their practicals is not Spinaceae oleracea, rather leafy vegetable a
>>>>>>>> variety of Beta vulgaris. It took me more than 10 years to make them
>>>>>>>> understand when they gave this plant in taxonomy classes. The 
>>>>>>>> description of
>>>>>>>> two is poles apart.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I request you to kindly go through the attached paper, study the
>>>>>>>> plants and then decide.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/6352/1/NPR%208(5)%20525-527.pdf<http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/6352/1/NPR%208%285%29%20525-527.pdf>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>>>>> I am not saying that this is Senna absus, but just for infrmation S.
>>>>>>>> absus is a species long established in India, has four leaflets and 
>>>>>>>> also a
>>>>>>>> gland between the leaflets.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Senna unflora has been introduced in in many places in India
>>>>>>>> including Pune, Karanataka and other places, and you and other members 
>>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>> soon find specimens with true S. uniflora characters.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Satish Phadke <
>>>>>>>> drsmpha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes I remember Aparna Watve ji had told me about the commonest
>>>>>>>>> similar looking plant without glands is Cassia tora.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Giby Kuriakose <
>>>>>>>>> giby.kuriak...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes this is *Cassia uniflora** *now known as *Senna* *uniflora* 
>>>>>>>>>> (Mill.)
>>>>>>>>>> H.S.Irwin & Barneby.
>>>>>>>>>> If you check the compound leaves carefully, you can see the
>>>>>>>>>> stalked yellow glands on the rachis in between leaflets (mostly with 
>>>>>>>>>> basal
>>>>>>>>>> 1-2 pairs). If they (stalked yellow glands) are not there in any of 
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> leaves this can be some other species.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Giby
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 27 October 2011 12:49, Satish Phadke <drsmpha...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I rechecked about similar plants in the vicinity.
>>>>>>>>>>> I agree with Rajdeo singh ji
>>>>>>>>>>> This appears to be a small plant of *Cassia uniflora* only.
>>>>>>>>>>> Similar small plants were showing two leflets each but the
>>>>>>>>>>> characters of leaves appear close to *C.uniflora* rather than *
>>>>>>>>>>> C.absus*.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Satish Phadke <
>>>>>>>>>>> drsmpha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am keeping a watch on the interesting discussion and learning
>>>>>>>>>>>> through this.
>>>>>>>>>>>> All comments are welcome.
>>>>>>>>>>>> There were several plants in the area all about 6 inches or so
>>>>>>>>>>>> tall They had two pairs of leaflets each.......prompting me about 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> identity of *S.absus*
>>>>>>>>>>>> If I happen to visit the area again I will try to extract some
>>>>>>>>>>>> more characters. Would any one like to suggest to check for some 
>>>>>>>>>>>> specific
>>>>>>>>>>>> character Pl. let me know.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dr Phadke
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:05 PM, H S <hemsan...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cassia absus never come in Single flower
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Gurcharan Singh <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> singh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Friends
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To me it again appears to be a case where we are discussing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the identity of a plant without considering authority.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It also highlights the fact that many of us give our decisions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without trying to justify our decision or negate others' 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me first point out that there is no accepted name such as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chamaecrista uniflora, nor any accepted species name Cassia 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uniflora
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now coming back to Cassia uniflora, there are two taxa by that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Cassia uniflora Mill., characterised by 5-9 leaflets,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flowers 2-6 together. This is now correctly known as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  *Senna* *uniflora* (Mill.) H.S.Irwin & Barneby
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://achutha.net/WeedWatch.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Senna uniflora Spreng., a very distinct plant with four
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leaflets arranged like a cross and with single flower. this is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now correctly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> known as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Chamaecrista* *ramosa* (Vogel) H.S.Irwin & Barneby
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://floredeguyane.piwigo.com/index?/category/28-chamaecrista_ramosa
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think Vijayasankar ji is correct in saying that Senna
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uniflora is the plant already discussed on our website for which 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provided the link.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And till we find a better choice, the best match is still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cassia absus L. now correctly known as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Chamaecrista* *absus* (L.) H.S.Irwin & Barneby
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:54 PM, H S <hemsan...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all are C. uniflora
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Vijayasankar <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vijay.botan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Agree with Rajdeo ji, it is not Cassia absus. If it is C.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uniflora, then the correct genus is Senna (S. uniflora), but 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to me it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't look like S. uniflora either. Pl c this link
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix/browse_thread/thread/669102a1420b541f?fwc=1&hl=en
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vijayasankar Raman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> National Center for Natural Products Research
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> University of Mississippi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:37 AM, H S 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <hemsan...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct genus for this plant is Chamaecrista
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:19 AM, rajdeo singh <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rajdeo.1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Satish ji,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is not Cassia absus,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its Cassia uniflora.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rajdeo Singh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Project fellow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> St. Xavier's College,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mumbai
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  - H.S.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a mere heart of stone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  - H.S.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mere heart of stone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  - H.S.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mere heart of stone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dr Satish Phadke
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Dr Satish Phadke
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> GIBY KURIAKOSE PhD
>>>>>>>>>> Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE),
>>>>>>>>>> Royal Enclave,
>>>>>>>>>> Jakkur Post, Srirampura
>>>>>>>>>> Bangalore- 560064
>>>>>>>>>> India
>>>>>>>>>> Phone - +91 9448714856 (Mobile)
>>>>>>>>>> visit my pictures @ http://www.flickr.com/photos/giby
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Dr Satish Phadke
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> GIBY KURIAKOSE PhD
>>>>>> Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE),
>>>>>> Royal Enclave,
>>>>>> Jakkur Post, Srirampura
>>>>>> Bangalore- 560064
>>>>>> India
>>>>>> Phone - +91 9448714856 (Mobile)
>>>>>> visit my pictures @ http://www.flickr.com/photos/giby
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dr Satish Phadke
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> GIBY KURIAKOSE PhD
> Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE),
> Royal Enclave,
> Jakkur Post, Srirampura
> Bangalore- 560064
> India
> Phone - +91 9448714856 (Mobile)
> visit my pictures @ http://www.flickr.com/photos/giby
>

Reply via email to