[efloraofindia:325513] Physalis‎‎ ‎(‎Solanaceae‎) page with images of species in efloraofindia

Dear members, Pl. go through‎ *Physalis* *‎‎* ‎(*‎**Solanaceae* *‎*) page with images of species in efloraofindia. I request you to pl. go thro

Re: [efloraofindia:325515] Fwd: Physalis minima ... Physalis lagascae

Thank you very much Garg ji for resurfacing the post and resolving the ID. Regards. Dinesh On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 12:39 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it should be *Physalis angulata* L. > > as p

Re: [efloraofindia:325514] Physalis Species for ID : Gangapur Grasslands : Nasik : 05NOV17 : AK-02

Thanks Garg Ji. Regards, Aarti On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 11:05 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it should be *Physalis angulata* L. > > as per images and details herein. > > -- Forwarded messa

[efloraofindia:325518] Physalis grisea in FOI

In Physalis grisea in FOI , some of the images may not be correct as per discussions at Solanaceae Week: Physalis grisea from Tikkar Tal Lake Morni

[efloraofindia:325519] Physalis lagascae in FOI

In Physalis lagascae in FOI , all images appears to be incorrect. Ist image is of *Physalis pruinosa* 2nd & 3rd image are of *Physal

[efloraofindia:325520] Physalis pruinosa in FOI

In Physalis pruinosa in FOI , images are of *Physalis peruviana* L. and not of *Physalis pruinosa* L.

Re: [efloraofindia:325523] Physalis Species for ID : Nasik : 14JUL19 : AK-22

Thanks Garg Ji. Regards, Aarti On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 11:28 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it should be Physalis angulata > > as > per comparative images at Physalis >

Re: [efloraofindia:325524] Rajgad, Dec 2014 :: Requesting ID - Asteraceae :: ARKFEB-05/05

Yes, Garg Ji, I too agreed with B.oxyodonta, With kind regards. On Sun, Jul 21, 2019, 18:04 J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it is close to *Blumea oxyodonta* > > as > per images, det

Re: [efloraofindia:325525] Fwd: ID280111phk1

Garg Ji, if it's prostrate to decumbent herb then only correct. With regards. On Sun, Jul 21, 2019, 18:01 JM Garg wrote: > I think it is close to *Blumea oxyodonta* > > as > per

Re: [efloraofindia:325526] NSD-21 JUL-2019 : ID-1

you're welcome, sir, Could be Pentaphylla, With regards. On Sun, 21 Jul 2019 at 10:36, 'Nayan Singh' via efloraofindia < indiantreepix@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Thanks a lot for your quick response and ID. > Any idea of species pl. > > Nayan. > ... > N.S.Dungriyal IFS >

[efloraofindia:325528] Re: Crepidium purpureum (Lindl.) Szlach.

This is Crepidium biaurita. Sorry for misidentification earlier. Pankaj On Tuesday, 28 August 2018 00:54:57 UTC+8, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > > Dear Members, > > Location: Suryabinayak, Nepal > Date: 29 July 2018 > Elevation: 4700 ft. > Habit : Wild > > Syn: Malaxis purpurea (Lindl.) Kuntze.

[efloraofindia:325529] Re: SK1296 17 JUL 2018

This is Crepidium biaurita. Sorry for misidetification. Pankaj On Wednesday, 18 July 2018 00:31:32 UTC+8, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > > Dear Members, > > Location: Gyaneswor, Kathmandu, Nepal > Date: 9 July 2018 > Altitude: 4000 ft. > > Crepidium ?? Malaxis ?? > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju >

[efloraofindia:325530] Re: Crepidium acuminatum (D.Don) Szlach. ???

This is Crepidium acuminatum. Saroj sir, can you please send me a high resolution image of this yellow variety? Thanks and regards Pankaj On Wednesday, 2 August 2017 17:41:09 UTC+8, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > > Dear Members, > > Location: Nagarkot, Nepal > Altitude:6600 ft. > Date: 20 June 2017

[efloraofindia:325531] Re: Crepidium purpureum SK

This is Crepidium purpureum. Saroj sir, can you please send me high resolution images of these? Pankaj On Saturday, 13 August 2016 11:50:42 UTC+8, JM Garg wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Saroj Kasaju > Date: 8 August 2016 at 17:11 > Subject: Re: Sharing Malaxis acumi

[efloraofindia:325532] Re: Crepidium acuminatum AT AUG2016/03

This is very strange, infact at once I thought this is a hybrid of Crepidium acuminatum and purpureum but I think this is merely a deformed flower of Crepidium acuminatum. Pankaj On Saturday, 6 August 2016 23:43:52 UTC+8, Anil Thakur wrote: > > Crepidium acuminatum > Syn. Microstylis wallichii

[efloraofindia:325533] Re: SK31JUL8-2016:ID

ok this is a bit confusing, but I think this is Crepidium biaurita and not purpureum. Its a bit mature flower so colour changed. It happens. If you look at the centre of some flowers, you can see the mounts. Sorry for wrong identification. Pankaj On Saturday, 9 July 2016 00:36:43 UTC+8, Saroj K

[efloraofindia:325534] Re: ORCHIDACEAE Juss. Fortnight: Crepidium purpureum (Lindl.) Szlach. from Hong Kong, PKS-121

This is surely Crepidium purpureum. Pankaj On Sunday, 20 October 2013 12:34:39 UTC+8, Dr Pankaj Kumar wrote: > > Crepidium purpureum (Lindl.) Szlach., Fragm. Florist. Geobot., Suppl. > 3: 131 (1995). > > Synonyms: > Microstylis purpurea Lindl., Gen. Sp. Orchid. Pl.: 20 (1830). > Malaxis purpu

[efloraofindia:325535] Re: ORCHIDACEAE Juss. Fortnight: Crepidium purpureum (Lindl.) Szlach. from Hong Kong, PKS-121

Even the pics uploaded by Rawat sir are different colourforms of Crepidium purpureum. Pankaj On Sunday, 20 October 2013 12:34:39 UTC+8, Dr Pankaj Kumar wrote: > > Crepidium purpureum (Lindl.) Szlach., Fragm. Florist. Geobot., Suppl. > 3: 131 (1995). > > Synonyms: > Microstylis purpurea Lindl

[efloraofindia:325536] Re: Orchid for ID

This is surely Crepidium purpureum. Very strange with tiny flowers or may be bracts are longer. Cant make out of the size. Thanks Pankaj On Thursday, 12 July 2012 18:31:56 UTC+8, orchid wrote: > > Dear all, > > Please identify this orchid species, at first I think it is Crepidium > acuminatum

[efloraofindia:325537] Re: Dendrobium bicameratum Lindl.

Yes this is Dendrobium bicameratum. I imagine this used to flower in April in Dehradun. Thanks for sharing. Pankaj On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 20:16, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Dear Members > Location: Gyaneswor, Kathmandu > Date: 19 July 2019 > Elevation: 1300 m. > Habitat : Wild > > Thank you. > > Saroj

[efloraofindia:325538] Re: Dendrobium bicameratum Lindl.

Thank you Pankaj. Saroj Kaaju ! On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 7:57 am, Pankaj Kumar wrote: > Yes this is Dendrobium bicameratum. I imagine this used to flower in April > in Dehradun. > Thanks for sharing. > Pankaj > > On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 20:16, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Dear Members >> Location: Gy

Re: [efloraofindia:325540] Requesting ID of this shrub - Lonavala - October 2013 :: 31012014 :: ARK-28

Resurfacing a very old thread. Requesting ID of the posted plant. Regards Alka Khare On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 at 6:18:18 PM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Alka Khare > > Date: 31 January 2014 19:3

Re: [efloraofindia:325541] HP, Oct 2014 :: Requesting ID - Medium sized tree :: ARKNOV-56

Resurfacing a very old thread. Requesting ID of the posted plant please. Thanks and regards Alka Khare On Saturday, November 29, 2014 at 8:32:37 PM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Alka Khare > > Date: 23

Re: [efloraofindia:325542] Requesting ID of this big shrub - MNP - Apr 2014 :: 08MAY2014 :: ARK-09

Resurfacing an old thread again. Requesting ID of the posted plant. Thanks and regards Alka Khare On Thursday, May 29, 2014 at 2:10:22 PM UTC+5:30, Alka Khare wrote: > > Thank you Chauhan ji for this additional piece of information. Will be > looking forward for the flowering season, any idea w

Re: [efloraofindia:325542] Re: SK31JUL8-2016:ID

Thanks, Pankaj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon 22 Jul, 2019, 7:00 AM Dr Pankaj Kumar, wrote: > ok this is a bit confusing, but I think this is Crepidium biaurita and not > purpureum. > Its a bit mature flower so colour changed. It happens. If you look at the > centre of some flowers, you

Re: [efloraofindia:325542] Re: Orchid for ID

Thanks, Pankaj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon 22 Jul, 2019, 7:05 AM Dr Pankaj Kumar, wrote: > This is surely Crepidium purpureum. Very strange with tiny flowers or may > be bracts are longer. > Cant make out of the size. > Thanks > Pankaj > > > On Thursday, 12 July 2012 18:31:56 UTC+8, o

Re: [efloraofindia:325545] Re: Crepidium acuminatum AT AUG2016/03

Thanks, Pankaj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon 22 Jul, 2019, 6:54 AM Dr Pankaj Kumar, wrote: > This is very strange, infact at once I thought this is a hybrid of > Crepidium acuminatum and purpureum but I think this is merely a deformed > flower of Crepidium acuminatum. > Pankaj > > > On

Re: [efloraofindia:325548] Re: Crepidium purpureum SK

Thanks, Pankaj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon 22 Jul, 2019, 6:52 AM Dr Pankaj Kumar, wrote: > This is Crepidium purpureum. > Saroj sir, can you please send me high resolution images of these? > Pankaj > > > On Saturday, 13 August 2016 11:50:42 UTC+8, JM Garg wrote: >> >> >> -- Fo

Re: [efloraofindia:325549] Re: Crepidium acuminatum (D.Don) Szlach. ???

Thanks, Pankaj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon 22 Jul, 2019, 6:51 AM Dr Pankaj Kumar, wrote: > This is Crepidium acuminatum. > Saroj sir, can you please send me a high resolution image of this yellow > variety? > Thanks and regards > Pankaj > > > On Wednesday, 2 August 2017 17:41:09 UTC+8

Re: [efloraofindia:325549] Re: SK1296 17 JUL 2018

Thanks, Pankaj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon 22 Jul, 2019, 6:35 AM Dr Pankaj Kumar, wrote: > This is Crepidium biaurita. > Sorry for misidetification. > Pankaj > > > On Wednesday, 18 July 2018 00:31:32 UTC+8, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: >> >> Dear Members, >> >> Location: Gyaneswor, Kath

Re: [efloraofindia:325555] Rajgad, Dec 2014 :: Requesting ID - Asteraceae :: ARKFEB-05/05

Thanks, Paradesi ji. On Sun, 21 Jul 2019 at 20:47, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, Garg Ji, I too agreed with B.oxyodonta, > With kind regards. > > On Sun, Jul 21, 2019, 18:04 J.M. Garg wrote: > >> I think it is close to *Blumea oxyodonta* >>

Re: [efloraofindia:325556] Fwd: ID280111phk1

Thanks, Paradesi ji, Flora of China says: Stems usually numerous, *prostrate or ascending*, 15-30(-40) cm. Pl. also see FOC illustration

[efloraofindia:325557] Blumea hieracifolia images in Flickr

Hi, Lalithamba ji, Your Blumea hieracifolia images in Flickr as below, seems to be of *Blumea oxyodonta* and not of *Blumea hieracifolia*

Re: [efloraofindia:325559] Rajgad, Dec 2014 :: Requesting ID - Asteraceae :: ARKFEB-05/05

Thanks Garg ji and Paradesi ji for concluding on the ID. Regards Alka Khare -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegr

Re: [efloraofindia:325563] Requesting ID of this shrub - Lonavala - October 2013 :: 31012014 :: ARK-28

Alka ji, Just a guess... I had seen a similar plant in Atlanta Botanical Garden which was identified as Lespedeza Species. Your plant looks close to Lespedeza bicolor. This is just a guess. Aarti On Monday, July 22, 2019 at 6:18:23 AM UTC+4, Alka Khare wrote: > > Resurfacing a very old thread. >

Fwd: [efloraofindia:325565] Asteraceae Week (Part II - Discoid heads) :: Blumea oxyodonta at Koraigad :: 16 JAN 11 :: DV35

I think closer to *Blumea oxyodonta* as originally suggested by Dinesh ji. Looks different from images at *Blumea lacera*

[efloraofindia:325571] Blumea lacera in FOI

Images of Blumea lacera in FOI looks close to *Blumea oxyodonta* as per images, details and references herein. Looks dif