A section has been added to http://community.jboss.org/docs/DOC-14839 with some
examples on how to configure Infinispan programmatically from 5.0 onwards.
Any feedback appreciated
Cheers,
--
Galder Zamarreño
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache
Nice. Perhaps you need a few basic configs though? Stuff that people would
typically use? A lot of your examples demonstrate some of the more complex
config examples (custom marshallers and interceptors). I think a lot of
first-time users will try and copy these into their IDEs and expect a
On 13 May 2011, at 19:27, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
Or does Reflections provide some cool way to find all subtypes of a
class? Even if it's a bit expensive, we already cache all new class
processing as for each new type we have to restart the Search engine
which is quite expensive anyway.
I
Not sure if the idea has come up but while at GeeCON last week I was discussing
to one of the attendees about state transfer improvements in replicated
environments:
The idea is that in a replicated environment, if a cache manager shuts down, it
would dump its memory contents to a cache store
Your description explains a use case / pattern but wo code showing how to
implement it properly.
In this case what's the best way for me to verify that the new data has indeed
been pushed to the cache?
put and then immediate get
Put, wait, get
Put all entries, then get all entries, and loop
On May 16, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
On 11-05-16 11:57 AM, Manik Surtani wrote:
Nice. Perhaps you need a few basic configs though? Stuff that people
would typically use? A lot of your examples demonstrate some of the more
complex config examples (custom marshallers
On 16 May 2011, at 13:52, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
Maybe your or Sanne can build that wiki or note in down in more detail since
you guys implemented it? You could use that code as sample
Sanne, do you want to take this, since you had more details of the impl?
Cheers
Manik
--
Manik Surtani
yes, looks good.
On 16 May 2011, at 16:15, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
Hmmm, maybe you caught me in the middle of updating the wiki? Check the link
again...
On May 16, 2011, at 5:12 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
Good stuff!
My only note is that there are some code snippets that are not code:
On May 16, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
Your description explains a use case / pattern but wo code showing how to
implement it properly.
True and I think you have a point, though the use of putForExternalRead()
itself is something that should be documented either its javadoc
On 13 May 2011, at 10:28, Manik Surtani wrote:
So this is related to ISPN-360 which is currently titled create
NodeJoinedEvent.
Leaving names out for now, essentially, what we need is a notification to
inform listeners that (a) a JGroups ViewChange has been detected (b) a rehash
has
Hi Olaf,
Did you see any problems with RHQ + Spring interaction that determined
you to exclude the rhq-pluginAnnotations dependency in the spring
module?
dependency
groupId${project.groupId}/groupId
artifactIdinfinispan-core/artifactId
On May 12, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:18 PM, David Bosschaert da...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/05/2011 17:54, Dan Berindei wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Pete Muirpm...@redhat.com wrote:
Were we developing for OSGi I would certainly agree with
On 16 May 2011, at 18:20, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
On May 12, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:18 PM, David Bosschaert da...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/05/2011 17:54, Dan Berindei wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Pete Muirpm...@redhat.com wrote:
Were
good place to remind that if you don't want the return value of a
write operation then you need to specify both flags:
cache.withFlags(Flag.SKIP_REMOTE_LOOKUP, Flag.SKIP_CACHE_LOAD).put( .. )
I guess that nobody knows that :)
Sanne
2011/5/16 Emmanuel Bernard emman...@hibernate.org:
Yes I think
Couldn't you have a higher level flag that says Flag.IGNORE_RETURN_VALUE so
that people wo a PhD can benefit form the feature?
On 16 mai 2011, at 19:37, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
good place to remind that if you don't want the return value of a
write operation then you need to specify both
I don't like the TCCL either, so I'll repeat my suggestion from two
weeks ago to just have:
Cache c = cacheManager.getCache( cacheName, classLoader );
sounds reasonable to me to have the application declare it's intentions once ?
BTW I don't like
cache.get(K key, ClassV clazz)
as we're not
I don't enjoy using JBoss Logging for that reason :)
I always have to get down to the JavaDoc or figure out the list of available
params to understand what debug* does for example and which one I need.
I guess that's taste and for something like JBoss Logging, a fluent API is
costly
What about a helper that just returns a cache with a specific classloader
from a cache?
cache.withLoader(cl).get(K key)
-a
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.comwrote:
On May 16, 2011, at 7:57 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
I don't like the TCCL either, so I'll
2011/5/16 Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com:
This is the hibernate session style contract that Jason is talking about.
As the CM can be shared (e.g. in JNDI), then the same Cache object can be
returned in multiple applications in the app server, meaning you can't simply
associate the CL with a
BTW having thought about it more, this seems to be the only option that
actually works at the API level, even if it will require some re-eng in
Infinispan core.
On 16 May 2011, at 19:29, Pete Muir wrote:
On 16 May 2011, at 19:24, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
2011/5/16 Pete Muir
Manik (and others),
Can you run this code on your laptops and let me know what happened!
Vladimir
public static void main (String [] arg) throws Exception {
final JGroupsDistSync ds = new JGroupsDistSync();
ds.acquireProcessingLock(false, 3, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
On 11-05-16 5:15 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
Feedback taken onboard: http://community.jboss.org/docs/DOC-14839
On May 16, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
Excellent wiki Galder! Finally worth its title (Configuring cache
programmatically)
Cheers.
I guess I qualify as others, since I'm looking at similar issues.
Got read lock
java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Thread-1 could not obtain exclusive
processing lock after 3 seconds. Locks in question are
java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock$ReadLock@16aa37a6[Read locks
= 1]
Same result here - where you expecting something different?
Cheers,
Sanne
2011/5/16 Erik Salter esal...@bnivideo.com:
EDIT: Originally posted in the wrong thread. I blame Outlook.
I guess I qualify as others, since I'm looking at similar issues.
Got read lock
Not to be the guy that breaks the circle, how about the threads that
handle incoming RPCs from other nodes? With storeAsBinary=false
those threads have to unmarshal the objects in order to store them on
the local node, so we'd need a way to register a classloader with the
cache, not just with the
25 matches
Mail list logo
