Am 20.05.11 08:34, schrieb Manik Surtani:
On 19 May 2011, at 20:56, Olaf Bergner wrote:
Yes, some form of MetaData would need to be defined. Or maybe we just need
size.
int sizeOfEntry(K key)
As of today LargeObjectMetadata already stores a large object's total
size. In the future it may
On 05/20/2011 05:01 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
2011/5/20 Manik Surtanima...@jboss.org:
Is spanning rows the only real solution? As you say it would mandate using
transactions to keep multiple rows coherent, and 'm not sure if everyone
would want to enable transactions for this.
I think
On 05/20/2011 03:54 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
Is spanning rows the only real solution? As you say it would mandate using
transactions to keep multiple rows coherent, and 'm not sure if everyone
would want to enable transactions for this.
There are more hidden overheads. To update a value,
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 7:04 AM, 이희승 (Trustin Lee) trus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/20/2011 03:54 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
Is spanning rows the only real solution? As you say it would mandate using
transactions to keep multiple rows coherent, and 'm not sure if everyone
would want to enable
