Also, Paul, what are your thoughts around timing for a 5.1.1.CR1 and .FINAL?
Sent from my mobile phone
On 28 Jan 2012, at 23:20, Manik Surtani ma...@jboss.org wrote:
On 28 Jan 2012, at 19:33, Paul Ferraro wrote:
It would be nice to see those few minor issues that I raised post-FINAL,
To reiterate what I said in another thread, the memory effects of virtual nodes
on on Hot Rod clients is none since version 1.1 of the protocol (included in
5.1).
I enhanced the protocol so that clients would generate virtual node hashes and
so avoid sending them over the wire.
Cheers,
On
