In 6.0 I would really like to go away from the current executor
configuration (e.g. a specific element for every executor) and allow the
creation of named executors (this is how the AS configuration works).
Tristan
On 11/27/2012 09:07 PM, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
Hi,
Although
On 5 Dec 2012, at 08:36, Tristan Tarrant wrote:
In 6.0 I would really like to go away from the current executor
configuration (e.g. a specific element for every executor) and allow the
creation of named executors (this is how the AS configuration works).
So that you can refer to the same
On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey Dan/Adrian,
Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2541
I'm looking at this intermittent failure, and it seems to be caused by the
fact
On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Bela Ban b...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/4/12 11:30 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
BTW, I also got an exception yesterday in MarshallExternalPojosTest and
I investigated it, but in my case the error was much weirder: two nodes
both opened a TCP connection to each
On 12/5/12 12:06 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Bela Ban b...@redhat.com wrote:
If a node A connects to B and B connects to A at the exact same time
(and there wasn't any existing connection between the 2 nodes, then one
of the 2 will 'win' and the other one will
On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Mircea Markus mmar...@redhat.com wrote:
On 4 Dec 2012, at 09:22, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
[...]
I don't think the cache should ever be in an illegal state to be used
after being
On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey Dan/Adrian,
Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2541
I'm looking at
On Dec 5, 2012, at 1:23 PM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey
On 12/5/12 1:23 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey Dan/Adrian,
Re:
On 5 December 2012 14:01, Bela Ban b...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/5/12 1:23 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño
On 12-12-05 5:07 AM, Mircea Markus wrote:
On 5 Dec 2012, at 08:36, Tristan Tarrant wrote:
In 6.0 I would really like to go away from the current executor
configuration (e.g. a specific element for every executor) and allow the
creation of named executors (this is how the AS configuration
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.orgwrote:
On 5 December 2012 14:01, Bela Ban b...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/5/12 1:23 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero
So to make sure I understood that, this has no visible impact on the
functionality of API methods, correct? Like any get operation would
successfully retrieve a remote entry if one exists somewhere?
On 5 December 2012 15:42, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:20
Yes.
Ideally I would like to have:
GlobalConfigurationBuilder global = new GlobalConfigurationBuilder();
global
.addExecutor().name(blah);
.addScheduledExecutor().name(sched);
Configuration config = new Configuration();
config
.clustering().async().replQueueExecutor(blah)
Yes, no visible impact.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.orgwrote:
So to make sure I understood that, this has no visible impact on the
functionality of API methods, correct? Like any get operation would
successfully retrieve a remote entry if one exists
Hi,
Beta6 will be cut on 13 Dec. Here's the list[1] of bugs scheduled:
http://goo.gl/ILjeM
Also just a heads up, CR1 is scheduled for 21 Dec.
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org)
___
infinispan-dev mailing list
On 5 Dec 2012, at 15:53, Tristan Tarrant wrote:
GlobalConfigurationBuilder global = new GlobalConfigurationBuilder();
global
.addExecutor().name(blah);
.addScheduledExecutor().name(sched);
Configuration config = new Configuration();
config
17 matches
Mail list logo
