Blocking OOB threads is the thing we want to avoid, remember?
I am used do synchronous replication, there we could hold a semaphore on
requests to each node. Going down before each RPC and up after that would be
pretty simple and having this mechanism in RPC layer it would block only
request,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Radim Vansa rva...@redhat.com wrote:
Blocking OOB threads is the thing we want to avoid, remember?
Well, you have to block somewhere...
I like Adrian's solution, because it's a lot better than CallerRunsPolicy:
it's blocking the OOB thread until any other
@Manik, thoughts?
I haven't seen Infinispan cache visit listeners being used that extensively…
Cheers,
Begin forwarded message:
From: Greg Luck gl...@gregluck.com
Subject: Do we need the ReadListener?
Date: March 14, 2013 12:41:57 AM GMT+01:00
To: jsr...@googlegroups.com
- Original Message -
| From: Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com
| To: infinispan -Dev List infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
| Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 10:03:10 AM
| Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] DefaultExecutorFactory and rejection policy
|
| On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Radim
