On 3 October 2014 18:38, Dennis Reed der...@redhat.com wrote:
Since size() is defined by the ConcurrentMap interface, it already has a
precisely defined meaning. The only correct implementation is E.
+1
The current non-correct implementation was just because it's expensive
to calculate
I think we should provide correct implementations of size() (and others)
and provide shortcut implementations using our usual Flag API (e.g.
SKIP_REMOTE_LOOKUP).
Tristan
On 06/10/14 12:57, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
On 3 October 2014 18:38, Dennis Reed der...@redhat.com wrote:
Since size() is
On 6 October 2014 12:44, Tristan Tarrant ttarr...@redhat.com wrote:
I think we should provide correct implementations of size() (and others)
and provide shortcut implementations using our usual Flag API (e.g.
SKIP_REMOTE_LOOKUP).
Right that would be very nice. Same for CacheStore interaction:
