On 06/28/2017 01:17 PM, Radim Vansa wrote:
> On 06/28/2017 10:40 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Radim Vansa wrote:
>>> On 06/27/2017 03:54 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Adrian Nistor wrote:
> I've said this in a previous thread on
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Radim Vansa wrote:
> On 06/28/2017 10:40 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Radim Vansa wrote:
>>> On 06/27/2017 03:54 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Adrian Nistor wrote:
> I've said this in a previous
On 06/28/2017 10:40 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Radim Vansa wrote:
>> On 06/27/2017 03:54 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Adrian Nistor wrote:
I've said this in a previous thread on this same issue, I will repeat
myself
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Radim Vansa wrote:
> On 06/27/2017 03:54 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Adrian Nistor wrote:
>>> I've said this in a previous thread on this same issue, I will repeat myself
>>> as many times as needed.
>>>
>>> Continuous queries requ
On 06/27/2017 03:54 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Adrian Nistor wrote:
>> I've said this in a previous thread on this same issue, I will repeat myself
>> as many times as needed.
>>
>> Continuous queries require the previous value itself, not just knowledge of
>> the t
I am with Adrian here, we want the core as simple as possible. The more
ifs, the more bugs - it's hard to track all the edge cases. And besides
declarative approach (saying that this cache can contain only entities
X, Y and Z) and only checking that, I think that there's little space
for 'loadi
