Sent from my iPhone
On 20 May 2013, at 12:58, Dan Berindei wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>>
>> On 16 May 2013, at 15:04, Dan Berindei wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys
>>>
>>> I'm working on an intermittent failure in NodeMoveAPIPessimisticTest and I
>>> thi
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>
> On 16 May 2013, at 15:04, Dan Berindei wrote:
>
> Hi guys
>
> I'm working on an intermittent failure in NodeMoveAPIPessimisticTest and I
> think I've come across what I think is underspecified behaviour in
> AtomicHashMap.
>
> Say we have
On 16 May 2013, at 15:04, Dan Berindei wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I'm working on an intermittent failure in NodeMoveAPIPessimisticTest and I
> think I've come across what I think is underspecified behaviour in
> AtomicHashMap.
>
> Say we have two transactions, tx1 and tx2, and they both work with
On 17 May 2013, at 14:06, Dan Berindei wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
>
> On 17 May 2013, at 07:35, Dan Berindei wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
> >
> > On 16 May 2013, at 15:04, Dan Berindei wrote:
> >
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
>
> On 17 May 2013, at 07:35, Dan Berindei wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Mircea Markus
> wrote:
> >
> > On 16 May 2013, at 15:04, Dan Berindei wrote:
> >
> > > Hi guys
> > >
> > > I'm working on an intermittent f
On 17 May 2013, at 07:35, Dan Berindei wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
>
> On 16 May 2013, at 15:04, Dan Berindei wrote:
>
> > Hi guys
> >
> > I'm working on an intermittent failure in NodeMoveAPIPessimisticTest and I
> > think I've come across what I
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
>
> On 16 May 2013, at 15:04, Dan Berindei wrote:
>
> > Hi guys
> >
> > I'm working on an intermittent failure in NodeMoveAPIPessimisticTest and
> I think I've come across what I think is underspecified behaviour in
> AtomicHashMap.
> >
> > S
On 16 May 2013, at 15:04, Dan Berindei wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I'm working on an intermittent failure in NodeMoveAPIPessimisticTest and I
> think I've come across what I think is underspecified behaviour in
> AtomicHashMap.
>
> Say we have two transactions, tx1 and tx2, and they both work with
Hi guys
I'm working on an intermittent failure in NodeMoveAPIPessimisticTest and I
think I've come across what I think is underspecified behaviour in
AtomicHashMap.
Say we have two transactions, tx1 and tx2, and they both work with the same
atomic map in a pessimistic cache:
1. tx1: am1 = Atomic