On 10/25/2013 08:17 PM, Pedro Ruivo wrote:
Hi guys.
I've open a JIRA to tack this: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3664
Suggestions/feedback is appreciated. This is probably be integrated in
the next major (but no promises).
I was not cleared just ping me.
Have a nice weekend folks
On 10/29/2013 07:58 AM, Radim Vansa wrote:
On 10/25/2013 08:17 PM, Pedro Ruivo wrote:
Hi guys.
I've open a JIRA to tack this: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3664
Suggestions/feedback is appreciated. This is probably be integrated in
the next major (but no promises).
I was not
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Pedro Ruivo pe...@infinispan.org wrote:
On 10/29/2013 07:58 AM, Radim Vansa wrote:
On 10/25/2013 08:17 PM, Pedro Ruivo wrote:
Hi guys.
I've open a JIRA to tack this:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3664
Suggestions/feedback is appreciated.
Hi Pedro,
I like the idea. Reducing the number of visitX commands for write commands
would be a good thing from the POV of adding new interceptors.
What would happen with existing visitPutKey…etc methods? Would this dissapear
or would they be left there still for those interceptors that want
Hi,
This was discussed in the last day in Farnborough. The idea is to keep
the visitX methods for each type of operations (something like):
* visitPutCommand
* visitRemoveCommand
* visitReplaceCommand
* visitRemoveIfEqualsCommand
* visitReplaceIfEqualsCommand
* visitPutIfAbsentCommand
and
On Oct 28, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Pedro,
I like the idea. Reducing the number of visitX commands for write commands
would be a good thing from the POV of adding new interceptors.
+1. It would also enforce code reuse between operations that amend
Hi guys.
I've open a JIRA to tack this: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3664
Suggestions/feedback is appreciated. This is probably be integrated in
the next major (but no promises).
I was not cleared just ping me.
Have a nice weekend folks :)
Regards,
Pedro
Description is the
