Yes, rolling upgrades should be even better, because for x-site you
need the source cluster to have a backup site configured (but not
enabled), and adding that to a running cluster may require a
one-by-one restart of all the nodes.
Dan
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Gustavo Fernandes
wrote:
>
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> Just throwing out an idea I just had while thinking of Hibernate OGM
> user needs for data migration.
>
> For people using databases & related frameworks, it's common to have a
> staging database which contains not just the staging "schema
On 14 March 2017 at 13:53, Dan Berindei wrote:
> Isn't this a lot like x-site state transfer?
Indeed! Does it mean we could have such a feature with less work?
Maybe some kind of "x-site for dummies" quickstart would be enough,
but re-framing the use case.
Thanks,
Sanne
>
> Dan
>
> On Tue, Mar
Isn't this a lot like x-site state transfer?
Dan
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Just throwing out an idea I just had while thinking of Hibernate OGM
> user needs for data migration.
>
> For people using databases & related frameworks, it's common to have a
> staging da
Just throwing out an idea I just had while thinking of Hibernate OGM
user needs for data migration.
For people using databases & related frameworks, it's common to have a
staging database which contains not just the staging "schema" but also
data. When legally possible, it's often preferable to ha
