On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
On 24 October 2011 12:58, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Galder
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Oct 24, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
ISPN-1470
Can't you just skip loading state and be happy with the state you
receive from peers? More data will be lazily loaded.
Applying of course only when you're not the only/first node in the
grid, in which case you have to load.
Right, we could preload only on the first node. With a shared
On Oct 24, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
Hi Galder
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Oct 24, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
ISPN-1470 (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1470) raises an
interesting question: if the
On Oct 24, 2011, at 2:42 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
On 24 October 2011 12:58, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Galder
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Oct 24, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
ISPN-1470
ISPN-1470 (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1470) raises an
interesting question: if the preloading happens before joining, the
preloading code won't know anything about the consistent hash. It will
load everything from the cache store, including the keys that are
owned by other nodes.
I
On 24 October 2011 12:58, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Galder
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Oct 24, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
ISPN-1470 (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1470) raises an
interesting question:
On 3 Oct 2011, at 01:09, Manik Surtani wrote:
On 28 Sep 2011, at 10:56, Dan Berindei wrote:
I'm not sure if the comment is valid though, since the old
StateTransferManager had priority 55 and it also cleared the data
container before applying the state from the coordinator. I'm not sure
