On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey Dan/Adrian,
Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2541
I'm looking at this intermittent failure, and it seems to be caused by the
fact
On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Bela Ban b...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/4/12 11:30 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
BTW, I also got an exception yesterday in MarshallExternalPojosTest and
I investigated it, but in my case the error was much weirder: two nodes
both opened a TCP connection to each
On 12/5/12 12:06 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Bela Ban b...@redhat.com wrote:
If a node A connects to B and B connects to A at the exact same time
(and there wasn't any existing connection between the 2 nodes, then one
of the 2 will 'win' and the other one will
On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Mircea Markus mmar...@redhat.com wrote:
On 4 Dec 2012, at 09:22, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
[...]
I don't think the cache should ever be in an illegal state to be used
after being
On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey Dan/Adrian,
Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2541
I'm looking at
On Dec 5, 2012, at 1:23 PM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey
On 12/5/12 1:23 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey Dan/Adrian,
Re:
On 5 December 2012 14:01, Bela Ban b...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/5/12 1:23 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.orgwrote:
On 5 December 2012 14:01, Bela Ban b...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/5/12 1:23 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero
So to make sure I understood that, this has no visible impact on the
functionality of API methods, correct? Like any get operation would
successfully retrieve a remote entry if one exists somewhere?
On 5 December 2012 15:42, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:20
Yes, no visible impact.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.orgwrote:
So to make sure I understood that, this has no visible impact on the
functionality of API methods, correct? Like any get operation would
successfully retrieve a remote entry if one exists
Hey Dan/Adrian,
Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2541
I'm looking at this intermittent failure, and it seems to be caused by the fact
that the test does not wait for the cluster to be formed when the new node is
started, which can lead a replication timeout failure from the new joining
On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey Dan/Adrian,
Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2541
I'm looking at this intermittent failure, and it seems to be caused by the
fact that the test does not wait for the cluster to be formed when the new
node is
On 4 Dec 2012, at 09:22, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
[...]
I don't think the cache should ever be in an illegal state to be used
after being started. So Infinispan should not require tests to wait
for a cluster to be formed, I'd rather guarantee that after a cache
is started it's usable.
+1.
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Mircea Markus mmar...@redhat.com wrote:
On 4 Dec 2012, at 09:22, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
[...]
I don't think the cache should ever be in an illegal state to be used
after being started. So Infinispan should not require tests to wait
for a cluster to be
On 12/4/12 11:30 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
BTW, I also got an exception yesterday in MarshallExternalPojosTest and
I investigated it, but in my case the error was much weirder: two nodes
both opened a TCP connection to each other, yet none of them received
the forwarded command. I've asked
16 matches
Mail list logo
