Hi all,
Dan and I had a chat to clarify some of these topics on IRC:
> On 16 Jun 2015, at 14:36, Dan Berindei wrote:
>
> Hey Galder
>
> I have finally read the proto8 code, and it looks quite good.
>
> I do have some concerns about how the lambdas will interact with
> distribution, because no
Hey Galder
I have finally read the proto8 code, and it looks quite good.
I do have some concerns about how the lambdas will interact with
distribution, because not every node performs conditional updates the
same way (at least not without total order):
1. In non-transactional caches, we will ret
> On 10 Jun 2015, at 04:08, William Burns wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:12 AM Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>
> > On 8 Jun 2015, at 10:57, Radim Vansa wrote:
> >
> > On 06/08/2015 10:41 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Galder Zamarreño
> >> wrote:
> O
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:12 AM Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>
> > On 8 Jun 2015, at 10:57, Radim Vansa wrote:
> >
> > On 06/08/2015 10:41 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Galder Zamarreño
> wrote:
> On 5 Jun 2015, at 14:15, Radim Vansa wrote:
>
> Is the m
> On 8 Jun 2015, at 10:57, Radim Vansa wrote:
>
> On 06/08/2015 10:41 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
On 5 Jun 2015, at 14:15, Radim Vansa wrote:
Is the marshalling comparison really fair? The lambda-table-based
approach
On 06/08/2015 10:41 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>>> On 5 Jun 2015, at 14:15, Radim Vansa wrote:
>>>
>>> Is the marshalling comparison really fair? The lambda-table-based
>>> approach removes the need for serializing the class definition, but
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>
>> On 5 Jun 2015, at 14:15, Radim Vansa wrote:
>>
>> Is the marshalling comparison really fair? The lambda-table-based
>> approach removes the need for serializing the class definition, but in
>> practice - is the class definition always
> On 5 Jun 2015, at 14:15, Radim Vansa wrote:
>
> Is the marshalling comparison really fair? The lambda-table-based
> approach removes the need for serializing the class definition, but in
> practice - is the class definition always send around with each RPC?
^ We've extensively added Infinis
Is the marshalling comparison really fair? The lambda-table-based
approach removes the need for serializing the class definition, but in
practice - is the class definition always send around with each RPC? If
it is so, it seems like a serious flaw of the current codebase, and not
something occu
