Sorry indentation below is broken because someone on this thread is
using HTML formatted emails.
On 5 May 2014 14:38, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 4:50 PM, William Burns mudokon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Sanne Grinovero
On 30 April 2014 15:06, William Burns mudokon...@gmail.com wrote:
Was wondering if anyone had any opinions on the API for this.
These are a few options that Dan and I mulled over:
Note the CloseableIterable inteface mentioned is just an interface
that extends both Closeable and Iterable.
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
On 30 April 2014 15:06, William Burns mudokon...@gmail.com wrote:
Was wondering if anyone had any opinions on the API for this.
These are a few options that Dan and I mulled over:
Note the CloseableIterable inteface
Was wondering if anyone had any opinions on the API for this.
These are a few options that Dan and I mulled over:
Note the CloseableIterable inteface mentioned is just an interface
that extends both Closeable and Iterable.
1. The API that is very similar to previously proposed in this list
but
Why listeners are not invoked? JCache iterator() notifies the listeners.
Can the iterator remove entries?
I assume there's no ordering guarantee, but behaviour under concurrent
changes would be rather tricky. I don't like the idea of iterating over
changing structure.
If you need to iterate
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Radim Vansa rva...@redhat.com wrote:
Why listeners are not invoked? JCache iterator() notifies the listeners.
Like I mentioned this can be changed. However, I have not seen a
cache entry visitor listener in JCache. The only listeners I am aware
of are for
I do realize you need such a feature, still as I pointed out when we
first drafted it I'm skeptical because of the complexities you
mention.
It highly depends on what use cases we want to address, but as a
general purpose solution I think this initial state received by the
clients needs to be
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
I do realize you need such a feature, still as I pointed out when we
first drafted it I'm skeptical because of the complexities you
mention.
It highly depends on what use cases we want to address, but as a
general
