2 votes for core vs 1 for commons, going for core/
On 19 Jun 2014, at 16:34, William Burns mudokon...@gmail.com wrote:
I was able to look into the details with this a bit. At first thought
I would think having a module that both the client and server packages
could both depend on would be
I was able to look into the details with this a bit. At first thought
I would think having a module that both the client and server packages
could both depend on would be best. However the issue is that these
factories produce instances that implement interfaces that live in the
core package,
