Github's wiki asciidoc doesn't play nicely with syntax highlighting: displays
all the code with the same plain color, instead of highlighting the syntax
elements like the IDEs do.
E.g. the sample code provided in the wiki asciidoc help:
.python.py
[source,python]
# i just wrote a comment
I only suggested AsciiDoc to be consistent with the markup used for our
documentation. Having two different markup syntaxes in use for the project
could get annoying... but yes, I agree that the lack of syntax highlighting
on the wiki can be even more annoying.
On 30 October 2013 12:55, Mircea
Hi,
Based on the discussions we had in Farnborough last week, I've set up a wiki
design page to describe the work we plan to do for dealing with cluster
partitions:
https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/wiki/Handling-cluster-partitions
Please review/comment.
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Hi,
I've added a wiki page[1] capturing our discussions around cluster events.
Any feedback welcomed!
[1] https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/wiki/Handling-cluster-partitions
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org)
On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:49 PM, Manik Surtani ma...@infinispan.org wrote:
I only suggested AsciiDoc to be consistent with the markup used for our
documentation. Having two different markup syntaxes in use for the project
could get annoying... but yes, I agree that the lack of syntax
Since it seems I can't comment on the wiki itself, I am just replying here.
I wonder if the third option 'Primary partition' is desirable. I
think availability in some cases would be harmed more than we would
like.
Lets say you have a 5 node cluster where 3 of the nodes are behind the
same
Ups, wrong URL.
This is the design for cluster events:
https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/wiki/Handling-cluster-partitions
On Oct 30, 2013, at 7:05 PM, Mircea Markus mmar...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I've added a wiki page[1] capturing our discussions around cluster events.
Any
Okay, and now the good URL (3rd try):
https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/wiki/Clustered-listeners
On Oct 30, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Mircea Markus mmar...@redhat.com wrote:
Ups, wrong URL.
This is the design for cluster events:
On Oct 30, 2013, at 7:28 PM, William Burns mudokon...@gmail.com wrote:
Since it seems I can't comment on the wiki itself, I am just replying here.
I wonder if the third option 'Primary partition' is desirable. I
think availability in some cases would be harmed more than we would
like.