I've created a JIRA to track this:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9151
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:21 AM Adrian Nistor wrote:
> +1 for both points.
>
> And I absolutely have to add that I never liked the annotation based
> listeners, both the embedded and the remote ones.
>
> On 04/16/2018
+1 for both points.
And I absolutely have to add that I never liked the annotation based
listeners, both the embedded and the remote ones.
On 04/16/2018 10:48 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
+1 to not require annotations, but -100 to ignore the annotations if
present, we should throw an exception ins
+1 to not require annotations, but -100 to ignore the annotations if
present, we should throw an exception instead.
Dan
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:57 PM, William Burns wrote:
> I personally have never been a fan of the whole annotation thing to
> configure your listener, unfortunately it just ha
I personally have never been a fan of the whole annotation thing to
configure your listener, unfortunately it just has been this way.
If you are just proposing to adding a new addClientListener method that
takes those arguments, I don't have a problem with it.
void addClientListener(Object listen
