Yes, I'm currently more tempted to wait for Stride (I have signed up for
early access).
Tristan
On 10/18/17 1:09 PM, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
> Some updates on memory issues we talked about
> https://slack.engineering/reducing-slacks-memory-footprint-4480fec7e8eb
>
> I looked at Stride
Discourse [1] is more of a forum replacement than a chat, but I'd
still like to suggest it. I hate it how in IRC you never know when a
user has finished their idea and it's safe to start replying, and
typing notifications don't really work for me :)
Dan
[1]: https://meta.discourse.org/
On
Sorry but I'm not going to use slack, I for one are planning to put my
system resources to better use.
On 18 Oct 2017 3:23 pm, "Sebastian Laskawiec" wrote:
> +1 to Slack. All JUG communities I know are using it. It is also worth to
> mention that Slack was also adopted by
Some updates on memory issues we talked about
https://slack.engineering/reducing-slacks-memory-footprint-4480fec7e8eb
I looked at Stride briefly and it also looks very promising with its
actions and decisions focus and deep integrations with Atlassian stack
we use anyway!
On 2017-10-16 8:45
+1 to Slack. All JUG communities I know are using it. It is also worth to
mention that Slack was also adopted by Kubernetes folks.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:17 PM Katia Aresti wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a strong adopter of slack and I really like it. I've used it since it
>
Hi all,
I'm a strong adopter of slack and I really like it. I've used it since it
came out with Duchess (we started with an internal use for the team, and we
have a community slack now with more that 150 people there that is little
by little replacing our google group). I've use it in different
HipChat is being replaced by Stride.
I have dimissed HipChat in the past because it did not allow for a
single account to be shared across multiple groups. I believe this will
be solved by Stride.
Tristan
On 10/16/17 11:16 AM, Wolf Fink wrote:
> Why not use Hipchat as EAP/Wildfly to prevent
Why not use Hipchat as EAP/Wildfly to prevent from too many different
platforms ?
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Tristan Tarrant
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> last week we discussed the possibility of abandoning IRC in favour of a
> more modern alternative.
>
> Hard
Some of us do a lot of communications / planning related work on
tablets & similar, and I assume that this trend will increase in the
future.
E.g. I regularly catch up on projects activity from the smartphone.
May I suggest the "mobile client" to be considered an hard
requirement? Changing