If they've migrated from sccs, this will have been done for them :-)
At 05:01 PM 6/19/00 -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
snip
However people should *not* ever be doing such silly things -- there are
more corner cases than just this one whre they can get into trouble!
snip
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 05:13:10PM -0500, David Thornley wrote:
Mike Little referred to "some previous cvs admin", and this is
precisely what happened in my case. Some previous CVS admin
put some of the rev numbers to 2.x, and there's no way I can put
them back to 1.x.
You could probably do
Hi all,
I am pretty new to WinCVS so please forgive me, if I have overlooked
something obvious.
I want to write a Tcl/Tk script to check, if files are locked by someone
(puting out only one line per file)
Is there a script around, that I can use ?
WinCVS 1.1b14 comes with a SelectionTest.tcl
Russ Allbery wrote :
|| David Thornley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
|| Either way, any technique that assumes that all main trunk development
|| is on rev numbers 1.* is useless to me, and probably to quite a few
|| people.
||
|| And it's quite possible to get into that state without any
"Greg A. Woods" wrote:
[ On Monday, June 19, 2000 at 17:13:10 (-0500), David Thornley wrote: ]
Subject: Re: ".trunk" patch refinement
Since it's a very natural thing to do, lots of people have done
it. It's easy (and correct) to say they should not have done
that, but the important
I have a new version of my ".trunk" patch (I sent it to bug-cvs
already but I didn't want to pollute everyone's mailbox
with a big patchfile twice, so I'm only sending this
URL to info-cvs...
Includes a new test case in sanity.sh for a revision "2.1"
Changes to docs, comments...minor stuff.
Just out of curiosity, I used my hacked version of
cvs to do this on my biggest repository:
cvs rdiff -s -r1 -r.trunk topmodule diffs.txt
There were 459 (out of 6658) files that had
a revision number that didn't start with "1",
and quite a few that I was surprised to see.
(that is, quit a
Howdy folks,
I am setting WinCVS to connect to a Linux server where the CVS
repository resides. I have setup the password authentication server
and I seem to be able to login from WinCVS. However, I am getting an
error in the status window. The error message is:
TCL is *not* available,
Mike Jellison wrote:
I don't understand why updating a major version number is a bad thing.
Conceptually speaking, there are two identifiers for any file under
configuration management: the
identifier-that-the-version-control-system-assigns-to-it-to-keep-track-of-it-for-its-own-purposes
and the
Kent,
You will need to install TCL on your windows machine.
I believe the link for this is:
http://dev.scriptics.com/software/tcltk/downloadnow83.tml
Tony
-Original Message-
From: Kent Yang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 3:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New to CVS -- Help!
For a production bug fix:
- After creating a branchtag via
"cvs rtag -b -r prodtag branchtag module"
then, modifying files/unit and system testing
- How do I merge the modified files back into the mainline/trunk of the CVS
source?
Thanks in advance for your reply(ies).
Hi,
we are using "log.pl" in the loginfo control file to send out
notification to developers on new check ins. We are using the passwd
access and have a public cvs account (cvsuser) for users which are
remote. CVS itself stores the remote user's name (let's say henry) for
the log message, but
Larry Jones wrote:
Brian Collins writes:
So, back to the branch, add another line (Line 3), commit it and merge it back
to the trunk as above. This gives conflicts, thus:
Line 1
f1
Line 2 on the trunk
===
Line 2 on the branch
Line 3
1.1.2.2
when
Hi, is it possible for CVS to generate all the changes I have made to a
module and save these changes as a patch file?
I'm asking this because I have two repositories and I wish to have CVS
generate all the changes I have made on the first repository since the
last tag and save the information
Hello,
I'm getting a problem (see below) whenver I try to a "get". I've
checked the directories for '#cvs.wfl' or '#cvs.rfl' and can't see any. Has
anyone seen this before? thanks!
Brian Zieroth
YellowGiant Corporation
cvs server: failed to create lock directory in repository
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 09:32:03AM +1000, Brian Collins wrote:
OK, so, if on the branch the change had looked like this:
Line 2 on the branch
Line 2A
and on the trunk it had looked like this:
Line 2 on the trunk
Line 2A
then adding "Line 3" on the branch after "Line 2A" would
Daniel Barsalou wrote:
Can we reset the revision number of a file to 1.1?
First off, I wouldn't do that if it were me. One of the major
advantages of CVS, in my mind, is that you can go back to any old
version of the file you like. And you always have that log and diff
information if you
No, but you might try www.wincvs.org.
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com )
--
"If I was modest, I'd be perfect."
-Ted Turner
Jonah Goldshlag wrote:
Hi, I'm not really sure if this is the
This won't apply to most of you, but just be warned.
There's a bug in WinCVS 1.0.6 (possibly only on Win2000) which causes
newly-added directories to be added in upper case, regardless of the
actual name of the directory. However, this only occurs when you use the
menu to add, not with the
You can play with the CVSUMASK environment variable. I'm not completely
sure how it works. See the manual.
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com )
--
151. H lp! S m b d st l ll th v w ls fr m m k yb
[ On Tuesday, June 20, 2000 at 10:41:16 (+0100), J. Cone wrote: ]
Subject: RE: ".trunk" patch refinement
If they've migrated from sccs, this will have been done for them :-)
Yeah, no thanks to the broken use of sccs2rcs. Unfortunately nobody
ever wrote an "sccs2cvs" that would properly
21 matches
Mail list logo
